Nice, France terrorist attack- 73 Dead

Started by Lucius9 pages

I bet France is real happy they have a large Islamic minority.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Just so you know, I'm a Gathic Zoroastrian. My dad is a Sufi Muslim and my mom is a Catholic Christian.

I don't believe you. If that was the case, you wouldn't be so ignorant about religion in general, claiming it's used as an excuse for hate. Anything's used as an excuse for hate.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Where does it say it was ISIS related?

It couldn't of been ISIS, they are just like a JV team. How could they ever commit acts of terror? They are too busy making one of the prettiest sounds on Earth: their call to prayer.

I hear the democrats are going to stage a sit in to ban trucks. Was this a truck free zone this happened in? That matters.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
So, as I understand it, Sufis reject Sharia law?

SUFISM EMANATES FROM THE SHARIA

I find that the word Sharia seems to scare non-Muslims for they associate it with medieval laws. ... Little wonder that most people simply do not relate the rigidity of Sharia with Sufism, which is perceived as a compassionate ideology.
Suffis strictly follow the Sharia
, Islamic laws based on the Quaran, Hadith and Imla, consensus of the Muslim community.

...

The Sufi philosophy is classified into three stages: Sharia, the outward law, Tareeqa, the Way and Haqeeqa, the Truth. Prophet Muhhamed said, 'The Sharia law is my word, Tareeqa my actions and Haqeeqa my inner state'.

^
Taken from Sufism: Heart of Islam by Sadia Dehlvi.

In short, Sufis embrace the Sharia.

Ehh. Christians twist the Bible to accept homosexuality when they should be stoning gays according to Leviticus. Obviously Muslims do the same. That's the thing about religion. It's all in the subjective interpretation.

Do you believe that all 1.3 billion Muslims of the world are fundamentalists?

Surely I'm mistaken though because it sounds like this guy had plans to kill a lot more people and it was a gun that stopped him. Surely this is false and he was defeated via hand to hand combat.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Ehh. Christians twist the Bible to accept homosexuality when they should be stoning gays according to Leviticus. Obviously Muslims do the same. That's the thing about religion. It's all in the subjective interpretation.

Leviticus was already discussed in other thread. In short, it does not hold binding for Christians. 👆 I am too lazy to find the thread.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Do you believe that all 1.3 billion Muslims of the world are fundamentalists?

Obviously not. 👆 But a very large part is, according to research studies such as Pew or CNN.

Originally posted by Surtur
Surely I'm mistaken though because it sounds like this guy had plans to kill a lot more people and it was a gun that stopped him. Surely this is false and he was defeated via hand to hand combat.
Gun stopped a terrorist? Nah. That's bollocks.

Originally posted by Surtur
Surely I'm mistaken though because it sounds like this guy had plans to kill a lot more people and it was a gun that stopped him. Surely this is false and he was defeated via hand to hand combat.

Who are these loony liberals you are talking to who say this wasn't terrorism and that the terrorist shouldn't have been shot?

Originally posted by Stigma
Leviticus was already discussed in other thread. In short, it does not hold binding for Christians. 👆 I am too lazy to find the thread.

Obviously not. 👆 But a very large part is, according to research studies such as Pew or CNN.

"does not hold binding"= subjective interpretation

Originally posted by Lestov16
Who are these loony liberals you are talking to who say this wasn't terrorism and that the terrorist shouldn't have been shot?

The same ones that come out of the woodwork whenever there is a shooting.

A gun saved lives. While this evil truck took them. Ban trucks, did nobody here see Maximum Overdrive?

Get the democrats some pillows for their sit in.

So you're using this attack in France to vent your rage at the entirely separate subject of US gun control?

Originally posted by Lestov16
So you're using this attack to vent your rage at gun control?

Wait didn't you use Orlando to vent rage about Christians?

But I'm not actually enraged, I'm just pointing out typical liberal responses to this. They need to ban some shit dude, and dag nabbit they gonna ban it.

But on a serious note yeah, a horrible loss of life and only further loss was prevented by a well timed gun shot. Thank you to whoever fired that shot.

That's the republican response too. They need to ban Muslims, and dag nabbit they gonna ban it.

Muslims who cant be vetted, but hey details details.

Also Republicans don't stage "Let's ban Muslim" sit ins last I checked.

just like guns can't be vetted (terrorists are killing us with legally purchased firearms), but hey details details

Yeah, they stage "Lets Ban Muslims" presidential rallies last I checked.

Originally posted by Lestov16
"does not hold binding"= subjective interpretation
reading a quote without context=literal interpretation. That almost never holds true for anything other than the 10 commandments and even those have books of explanations. For someone who claims to have a Muslim father and christian mother, you know next to nothing about either religions.

You misunderstand, some want to ban literally all guns.

Now as for the other thing, if I type in "Let's Ban Muslims presidential rally" into google I will find these so called rallies, right? No I do not mean a rally where it is merely mentioned, but rallies specifically just dedicated to banning Muslims.

They don't exist