Nice, France terrorist attack- 73 Dead

That can't be the case Lestov just said they exist. He wouldn't lie to us just to make a point.

Granted I am searching for ban muslim rallies and can't find any but I just think google is racist.

Originally posted by Surtur
You misunderstand, some want to ban literally all guns.

Now as for the other thing, if I type in "Let's Ban Muslims presidential rally" into google I will find these so called rallies, right? No I do not mean a rally where it is merely mentioned, but rallies specifically just dedicated to banning Muslims.

So some means all to you? So if I said all white people are racists, you're going to say it's true because some are?

Well I just typed in "Lets Ban Guns Sit In" into Google and nothing substantial came up.

I never said some means all. I was pointing out some want all guns banned, that is a thing. While people like Trump spoke of temporarily stopping Muslims who can't be vetted from coming in here.

In other words I'm talking about the level of extremism and you still didn't tell me where these "Ban Muslim" rallies are held.

Weird, some cops shot black people but you say the entire cop culture needs to change. Your double standards are impressive.

You make it sound as though all liberals are extremists

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said some means all. I was pointing out some want all guns banned, that is a thing. While people like Trump spoke of temporarily stopping Muslims who can't be vetted from coming in here.

In other words I'm talking about the level of extremism and you still didn't tell me where these "Ban Muslim" rallies are held.

Well considering we've went 3 years and America's Syrian refuge vetting process hasn't failed us yet, why have such rallies?

It's funny that republicans find Syrian refugees more dangerous than guns even though we haven't been attacked by terrorists who posed as Syrian refugees but we have been attacked by terrorists who use legally purchased firearms.

He lest, how many idiots here did we have denying it was terrorism?

You mean MS? Dude is just a contrarian troll attention whore. He has nothing to substantial to add to the discussion. That's why I put him on ignore.

Originally posted by Lestov16
You mean MS? Dude is just a contrarian troll attention whore. He has nothing to substantial to add to the discussion. That's why I put him on ignore.

👆

Originally posted by Lestov16

Lets stop phucking around and get some troops on the ground

How about we hire mercenaries to fight mercenaries instead of sending US troops in?

Provided we monitor those mercenaries to make sure they're not committing any war crimes, then absolutely.

But any kind of ground campaign will be impossible if Trump attempts his Muslim ban, which will lose us all support in the region.

He said he is not longer going to do the Muslim ban.

Originally posted by Lestov16
You mean MS? Dude is just a contrarian troll attention whore. He has nothing to substantial to add to the discussion. That's why I put him on ignore.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
He said he is not longer going to do the Muslim ban.

Hmm...

Also, I was going to say I changed my mind on the mercenaries. I think we should officially go over there. When Al Qaeda attacked our homeland it was personal. When Japan attacked our homeland it was personal. Now ISIS has attacked our homeland. Sending mercenaries downplays the offense they have committed against us. We had troops on the streets of Afghanistan in a month after 9/11. It's been a month since the Pulse Orlando Massacre and where are our troops? They need to be on the streets of Raqqa.

They personally came here (yeah Mateen was homegrown but both he and ISIS say that he was ISIS, so technically he is one of theirs) and attacked us on our soil, so it's time for us to do the same to them.

Having been over there a few times, and seeing all my friends die and get their legs blown off, I cannot condone sending more.

We might try to ban trucks now.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Having been over there a few times, and seeing all my friends die and get their legs blown off, I cannot condone sending more.

Well in that case, I would go with mercenaries, but they would have to be elite, equipped and honorable, and subjected to a thorough background check available to the American public, as they will be representing us in the field on the international stage.

Hiring mercenaries is a risky proposition due to the tendency of mercenaries to commit war crimes and human rights violations. We will have to take every safeguard to make sure they do not.

FFL

They aren't mercenaries though.

I dont want to see more Americans mauled in the middle east either. How about we just don't let any refugees in. How about we use our tax money to help the homeless and spend more on prison rehabilitation and help children with cancer.

Gee. Ultimately our government is here to protect us. That's the original intent right? So how about we just remotely bomb the shit out of these guys and spend American money on america.
We can sit back and tell France and Germany I told you so and warch their people slowly become pissed off and envy us.
sounds like a plan

How will banning the refugees help? Syrian refugees have posed no threat to us in America. Unlike Europe, our vetting system is beastly.

Doesn't matter anyways. Trump called off his Muslim ban.