Originally posted by Nephthys
It isn't. It's paralysis, so I guess that is another thing the Wrath has over Maul.That seems an awful lot like a bunch of speculation. Mauls never displayed anything like the techniques you named. Just because Ventress can do something doesn't suggest Maul can. Sidious trained Maul to be a weapon, he had no need to teach him necromancy and alchemy. The Wrath isn't meant to have these techniques, he does. Maul can't say the same about the things you're suggesting he might possess. And learning about peoples histories isn't remotely the same thing as learning their techniques, lol.
So Maul is better at losing then. Good for him. The Wrath can shape the Force to become nearly invulnerable. Personally I find that more useful than not dying when cut in half.
Plenty of people who would massacre the Wrath have never shown Stasis, nor is it noted as being a particularly esoteric technique - hence why it pretty much just surfaces in RPG games. 🙄
Not really. I've proven in other threads that Maul was meant to be much more than a weapon, and TCW makes this abundantly clear as well. If you can read what I've linked below and still believe Maul is just a weapon, you're being willfully ignorant, which isn't exactly an issue for me.
http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/obi-wan-vs-maul-read-1765585/?page=1#js-message-16188923
Besides, "just a weapon" has got to be the shittest excuse used against Maul ever. Being a warrior is pretty much the Wrath's only job, and it's a role highly idolised and respected in the Sith Order. Strengthening your connection to the Dark Side through conflict and combat, and making it your life's mission to kill the Jedi is Sith doctrine 101, but apparently Malgus, Ulic, Wrath, and every other Sith-Warrior type other than Maul escapes the label "weapon" or "assassin" because... reasons?
Srsly, making fun of a Sith for being good at one of the most important things Sith do is the equivalent of criticising an MMA fighter for only being good at fighting. It's illogical and arbitrary.
Ventress is a Dark Jedi who had scraped the surface of Sith training, Maul is one of the most highly trained Sith to have ever existed and was meant to be capable of carrying on the RoT. Sidious' Force Drain minions don't even register. Even if Maul isn't capable of those precise techniques, he's clearly of a higher calibre irregardless. Ergo, I don't find SWTOR saying what Force techniques a Sith Warrior archetype may be capable of overly compelling, especially in the absence of the Wrath not having shown anything with them. I'll give you brownie points for the part about histories though, since you seem kind of perturbed about this whole discussion. 👆
"can shape the Force to become nearly invulnerable" sounds like some awesome hyperbole bruh, so much better than surviving one of the worst injuries sustained by a Sith in the mythos, which was explicitly noted to be a monumental demonstration of Dark Side knowledge and power, even relative to Sidious's own knowing. It's almost like the source material is spelling it out for us or something.