Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Yes, do you not understand what the word significant means? I understand you're stupid, but I want to believe you at least understand basic grammar and vocabulary.
I can't be sure, but I think the point was that since they are female they can't be significant in any regard.
Originally posted by Surtur
I can't be sure, but I think the point was that since they are female they can't be significant in any regard.
Sure, if he was retarded and didn't understand that "significant" pertains to their importance in regards to his claim that women in high position are responsible for the collapse of Rome, because obviously if such women existed, their role in the matter would obviously be very important, particularly in regards to this conversation.
But I'm pretty sure he's not that retarded.
They were in high positions of power in the senate, but because they were women it was swept under the rug because they not significant and ruined everything. Theres is a very dark under the rug sweeping of that entire era and out of nowhere europe worshipped a dead jew.
Basically, they didnt do anything, which is why rome collapsed, why it was their fault AND why they were insignificant. But yeah, significantly, they did **** all and rome collapsed.
http://listverse.com/2011/10/20/15-interesting-women-of-ancient-rome/
Behind the scenes.
Originally posted by Withsensibility
http://listverse.com/2011/10/20/15-interesting-women-of-ancient-rome/Behind the scenes.
And not one of them was a senator. Hell, half of them lived before the Republic transitioned into an empire.
They also had very little impact compared to the men actually responsible for helping the empire collapse, but alright.
Originally posted by Withsensibility
was just enough to ruin it.
Livia, who some consider the most influential woman in Roman history, was nothing but an asset to Augustus and his building the foundations of the empire, and helped ensure that his will was done after his death into the reign of Tiberius.
In contrast, none of the women in the link you provided even lived in the period that saw the cracks begin to form in the empire. Seriously, your trolling is piss baby weak, you could at least try and draw a comparison between the migration crisis of today and the influx of Germanic and Gothic migrants into the Roman Empire, that would at least make some semblance of sense. Women in the senate wtf. 👇
Originally posted by FinalAnswerWomen started to help influence rome, then immigration, jews and more women influence, then cracks formed, then arabs, i mean, goths, took over.
Livia, who some consider the most influential woman in Roman history, was nothing but an asset to Augustus and his building the foundations of the empire, and helped ensure that his will was done after his death into the reign of Tiberius.In contrast, none of the women in the link you provided even lived in the period that saw the cracks begin to form in the empire. Seriously, your trolling is piss baby weak, you could at least try and draw a comparison between the migration crisis of today and the influx of Germanic and Gothic migrants into the Roman Empire, that would at least make some semblance of sense. Women in the senate wtf. 👇
Its a process of how civilisation gets destroyed. It starts with women, then gets perpetuated by Jews, then immigration and war.
Hitler had the right idea. Tell the jews to **** off and become rich and glorious. Richest nation in 1933, no jews in power. Not a coincidence.
Rome can't be said to have fallen based on one factor. It was dozens. The fact that the elites were isolating themselves in self-sufficient estates and dodging taxes. The fact that Rome's armies were mostly comprised of "barbarians" who weren't truly loyal. Flat out racism in dealing with the Goths. The way the Goth situation was handled and how they weren't properly integrated into the state. Inefficiency combined with a huge empire. The rise of external threats. The unstable leadership. Rampant corruption. Stagnation. Etc.
Originally posted by Withsensibility
Women started to help influence rome, then immigration, jews and more women influence, then cracks formed, then arabs, i mean, goths, took over.Its a process of how civilisation gets destroyed. It starts with women, then gets perpetuated by Jews, then immigration and war.
Hitler had the right idea. Tell the jews to **** off and become rich and glorious. Richest nation in 1933, no jews in power. Not a coincidence.
That's better, it's a shame you don't have a lick of proof for any of that though. I, on the other hand, can just point out that, y'know, the Romans destroyed Israel, scattered the Jewish people to the four winds, kicked the, to the curb, then only increased the violence against after the empire converted to Christianity. In fact, it was only under Julian the Apostate, the only non-Christian emperor after Constatine, that the pressure on them began to ease, and he was even willing to let them rebuild the Temple in Jersusalem. And then he was killed in battle against the Persians, reconstruction was cancelled, and the persecution started up again.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Rome can't be said to have fallen based on one factor. It was dozens. The fact that the elites were isolating themselves in self-sufficient estates and dodging taxes. The fact that Rome's armies were mostly comprised of "barbarians" who weren't truly loyal. Flat out racism in dealing with the Goths. The way the Goth situation was handled and how they weren't properly integrated into the state. Inefficiency combined with a huge empire. The rise of external threats. The unstable leadership. Rampant corruption. Stagnation. Etc.
#GothsLivesMatter