Originally posted by BeniboyblingThat still isn't looking at the time in which they fought each other. That doesn't just start when they are separated from Kenobi. you want to go towards the end when they fought after the laser barriers opened. You have to look at the start of their duel with all combatants to the end when Qui was impaled.
Because he was intentionally luring Qui-Gon into a trap, once he was separated from Kenobi Jinn was defeated in 30.On top of that their duel on Tatooine lasted around the same length, in which Jinn is being constantly pushed back and described as barely escaping with his life.
For someone who claims to support Maul, you are rather uninformed. 🙂
I am looking at this objectively you are trying to slant everything in a pro Tano light because you're clearly biased. You will also purposely deceive or mislead when you know damn well Ezra went with Maul because it was logical to pair the strongest with the weakest.
🙂 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
So once again this guys words are studied and worshipped. All this does is bring down the stock of Vader and Palpatine. Maul already went blow for blow against her. Vader on the other hand was injured by Tano. Poor shitty cyborg that guy.
lol, typical. This doesn't bring down the stock of Vader and Palpatine. Palpatine and Vader being able to match her blow for blow =/= Ahsoka being able to match them blow for blow. It's just Filoni stating the obvious: Vader and Palpatine are the only ones in Rebels capable of defeating Ahsoka. That clearly and undoubtedly includes Maul, so you lose.
And sure, Maul went blow for blow very briefly, who knows how he would've fared in a long duel. This honestly puts it in a new light.
Also, Vader defeated Ahsoka, and she only injured him while distracted. As always, shitty arguments.
Originally posted by |King Joker|You are correct in this regard. Abc logic isn't the end all be all. Ezra's pairing with Maul certainly suggests he is the strongest. You can't deny that and then highlight the fruitless merits of abc logic.
Or maybe it's realizing that the difference in performance against the Inquisitors isn't the be-all and end-all in determining who the overall superior fighter is between Tano and Maul.
Originally posted by quanchi112Lmao, concession accepted.
That still isn't looking at the time in which they fought each other. That doesn't just start when they are separated from Kenobi. you want to go towards the end when they fought after the laser barriers opened. You have to look at the start of their duel with all combatants to the end when Qui was impaled.I am looking at this objectively you are trying to slant everything in a pro Tano light because you're clearly biased. You will also purposely deceive or mislead when you know damn well Ezra went with Maul because it was logical to pair the strongest with the weakest.
🙂 🙂
Originally posted by PetrusPetrus, I love you. 🙂
lol, typical. This doesn't bring down the stock of Vader and Palpatine. Palpatine and Vader being able to match her blow for blow =/= Ahsoka being able to match them blow for blow. It's just Filoni stating the obvious: Vader and Palpatine are the only ones in Rebels capable of defeating Ahsoka. That clearly and undoubtedly includes Maul, so you lose.
Originally posted by PetrusIn the same episode Maul the strongest was paired with Ezra the weakest of the four. Vader and Palpatine aren't nor have they ever been unbeatable. The mental gymnastics and bias the Vader and Palpatine supporters have come up with to support their idols is desperation at its most palpable.
lol, typical. This doesn't bring down the stock of Vader and Palpatine. Palpatine and Vader being able to match her blow for blow =/= Ahsoka being able to match them blow for blow. It's just Filoni stating the obvious: Vader and Palpatine are the only ones in Rebels capable of defeating Ahsoka. That clearly and undoubtedly includes Maul, so you lose.And sure, Maul went blow for blow very briefly, who knows how he would've fared in a long duel. This honestly puts it in a new light.
Also, Vader defeated Ahsoka, and she only injured him while distracted. As always, shitty arguments.
Originally posted by quanchi112
In the same episode Maul the strongest was paired with Ezra the weakest of the four. Vader and Palpatine aren't nor have they ever been unbeatable. The mental gymnastics and bias the Vader and Palpatine supporters have come up with to support their idols is desperation at its most palpable.
Yeah, I guess your whining is more credible than Filoni's statements, the creator of the series. 👆
Originally posted by |King Joker|
Or maybe it's realizing that the difference in performance against the Inquisitors isn't the be-all and end-all in determining who the overall superior fighter is between Tano and Maul.
So in other words you believe that:
a)Ashoka can perform worse than Maul against the Inquisitors
b)despite that, she can magically perform better against Vader and Sidious, who are to the Inquisitors what a dragon is to a lizard
You don't see how those two things contradict each other?
Instead of accepting the truth that Maul is stronger than Ashoka, you rely on a convoluted and distorted thought process so can you reconcile that contradiction.
One might call it... mental acrobatics.