Dave Filoni on Ahsoka Tano vs Darth Vader / The Emperor

Started by quanchi11236 pages

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah but if it wasn't a stalemate, then what makes him think Maul was winning and not Tano? Lol

Given the praise Tano gets from Filoni and Co., and given Maul's admitted inferiority to Vader and his complete embarrassment against blind Kanan, I would have thought any Maul fan would be happy to accept his stalemate against Ahsoka.

Tano fled so she forfeited the duel either way. Facts are still facts.

Again you pick and choose which statements to accept. The heroes survived just like they did when they went up against Vader. They humiliated Vader twice in one episode. Knocked him on his ass and then defeated him as a pilot.

Maul also defeated Kanan because Tano had to step in to save his life. Not the case with Vader when he went up against pitiful Ezra and Kanan. As I said the facts are on my side. 🙂

The facts were apparently on the scientists' side when they were "proving" that African Americans had smaller brains. It's not a matter of whether or not the facts are on your side, it's a matter of how much you twisted the facts to get them on your side 👆

Quanchi be twistin 'facts' a little but yet he still continues to win...

Originally posted by SunRazer
The facts were apparently on the scientists' side when they were "proving" that African Americans had smaller brains. It's not a matter of whether or not the facts are on your side, it's a matter of how much you twisted the facts to get them on your side 👆
What facts have I twisted ?

Maul had Kanan dead to rights before Tano stepped in to defend him. Vader failed against Kanan and Ezra together. Vader was outmaneuvered as a pilot in the same episode when he crossed paths with the rebels. Tano left the fight with Maul.

Get specific when debating and quit making blanket vague statements which have no place here.

@Ching - It's impossible to win a Maul > Vader debate, lol.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Quanchi be twistin 'facts' a little but yet he still continues to win...
What did I twist ?

Quanchi is the Trump of KMC and he's got me sucked in...

Originally posted by SunRazer
@Ching - It's impossible to win a Maul > Vader debate, lol.
So you admit to being biased despite no evidence to assert Vader is undeniably greater than Maul. You are as biased as they come. I bet you also make up excuses for Windu's win over Palpatine.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Quanchi is the Trump of KMC and he's got me sucked in...
I will make kmc great again. Believe in Quan.

With a small loan of a million dollars...

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
With a small loan of a million dollars...
Have you noticed how Sunrazer has fled the scene.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit to being biased despite no evidence to assert Vader is undeniably greater than Maul.

This shouldn't be hard to see for someone who sides with the facts... but I suppose that's the difference between siding with the facts and the twisting the facts to side with you 🙂

You are as biased as they come.

I love it when people accuse me of things they're guilty of.

I bet you also make up excuses for Windu's win over Palpatine.

Again, if you align with the facts, then you have to admit that Mace's win isn't concrete. It's outright stated that you can interpret it otherwise, lmfao.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah but if it wasn't a stalemate, then what makes him think Maul was winning and not Tano? Lol

Given the praise Tano gets from Filoni and Co., and given Maul's admitted inferiority to Vader and his complete embarrassment against blind Kanan, I would have thought any Maul fan would be happy to accept his stalemate against Ahsoka.

Yeah the notion that Maul was winning during that off-panel period, but then conceded that advantage almost entirely when on-screen, is awfully convenient.

However looking over the fight again I think we can be pretty certain that its not the case, considering Ahsoka doesn't appear to have lost any ground:

Her distance from Kanan before and after is practically unchanged, so either she lost ground then regained it, gained ground but lost it, or didn't lose any ground at all, either way nobody is winning.

So because Ashoka attacked first she automatically won?

Originally posted by SunRazer
This shouldn't be hard to see for someone who sides with the facts... but I suppose that's the difference between siding with the facts and the twisting the facts to side with you 🙂

I love it when people accuse me of things they're guilty of.

Again, if you align with the facts, then you have to admit that Mace's win isn't concrete. It's outright stated that you can interpret it otherwise, lmfao.

What facts then ? Do you normally respond with little to no relevant information.

No, the facts are Windu disarmed and had him beaten. You are biased. It's painfully obvious but you're so deluded you can't even see it anymore and you believe your ridiculous justifications.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
So because Ashoka attacked first she automatically won?
Not sure if more mentally inhibited than Quan, or just being facetious. mmm

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Not sure if more mentally inhibited than Quan, or being facetious. mmm

🍺

Tano fans are really upset she forfeited her duel against Maul. Vader fans are also disturbed she wrecked his helmet and he gimped off as the episode ended. I am grinning ear to ear. Great time to be a Maul fan. 🙂

😉

Originally posted by SunRazer
The facts were apparently on the scientists' side when they were "proving" that African Americans had smaller brains. It's not a matter of whether or not the facts are on your side, it's a matter of how much you twisted the facts to get them on your side 👆

😂

👆

Originally posted by Darth Thor
😂

👆

Here to suck another man's *** brave enough to respond to Quan the great. When will you feel ashamed.