Dave Filoni on Ahsoka Tano vs Darth Vader / The Emperor

Originally posted by Kurk
How about saying that Dooku is slower than Kenobi?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Maneuverability he is but skill wise with a saber he's better.

Dooku,Obi-wan and Vader are all superior to Maul.

Obi Wan's debatable tbh.

Originally posted by Kurk
Do we really have to go through this again? I thought you accepted that you were wrong the last time.

Originally posted by playa1258
Dooku and Vader are superior to Maul.

Lmao. I love Dooku vs Kenobi fights, he gets his ass handed to him every time

Originally posted by quanchi112
Clumsy doesn't mean slow. Your scans prove my case. Dooku's skill is superior and he capitalizes on Kenobi's inferiority.

Also in that same fight on Oba Diah, Dooku roundhouse kicks Anakin in the head in case that means anything to you.

Originally posted by Kurk
he used his last burst of dark power to continue his spin into a blindingly fast wheel-kick that brought his heel against the point of Kenobi's chin with a crack like the report of a huge-bore slugthrower, knocking the Jedi Master back down the stairs.
Source: Revenge of the Sith

Also in that same fight on Oba Diah, Dooku roundhouse kicks Anakin in the head in case that means anything to you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
None of this disputes my claims. You wish for Kenobi to be slower he's just less skilled and less powerful. That's it. I cast thee out.

Are you sure you want to paint Kenobi as being faster than Dooku? That wouldn't be good for pro-Maul people in Maul vs Kenobi debates.

Dooku has Kenobi covered in all categories very solidly. What's the debate here exactly?

Originally posted by Kurk
Since Kenobi is faster, that's why he just let Dooku kick him all 3 of the times I've mentioned, right? What about when Dooku grabbed his lapel and threw him around on Oba Diah? Did Kenobi choose not to pay attention there either?

Are you sure you want to paint Kenobi as being faster than Dooku? That wouldn't be good for pro-Maul people in Maul vs Kenobi debates.

Maul is better than Kenobi so why does it matter.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Dooku has Kenobi covered in all categories very solidly. What's the debate here exactly?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Dooku's higher skill level.

Maul is better than Kenobi so why does it matter.

Originally posted by Kurk
Quan think Kenobi is physically faster than Dooku outside of saber technique. I know, right?
Very weak rebuttal. Don't become timid now Quan; you were so vocal just a moment before.

Both are faster than Dooku so what's your point, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is undoubtedly is. The evidence supports my viewpoints.

Both are faster than Dooku so what's your point, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is undoubtedly is. The evidence supports my viewpoints.

Both are faster than Dooku so what's your point, kid.

Probably the best thing on the Internet ^

Originally posted by Kurk
Quan think Kenobi is physically faster than Dooku outside of saber technique. I know, right?

He's right, for a change.

Originally posted by Kurk
You haven't said anything to justify Kenobi being faster than Dooku. You just keep saying Dooku's more skillful which by itself means nothing. When has Kenobi outmaneuvered Dooku?

You expect Evidence from Quanchi? 😂

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
He's right, for a change.

😬

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/30/05/30B699A100000578-3423835-image-a-58_1454131869026.jp