Originally posted by quanchi112
You are misunderstanding me. I didn't mean he meant to imply he's a scrub only that he needed them for Vader as to assuade their anxiety in aligning with a former Sith Lord. You just screwed the pooch with this and thus concede he thought he'd meet up with Vader and tried to kill them anyways.
Right. So what about that part where you said Maul was deceiving them into making them think he was weak...? I'm asking you directly about it now, so just stop trying to avoid it saying 'I misunderstand' or 'I missed the point'.
The fact that Maul thought he might eventually face Vader in no way proves the following:
1. Maul is above Vader.
2. Maul thinks he's above Vader.
3. Maul wouldn't avoid facing Vader if possible.
And I still have yet to concede shit to you and your shitty arguments.
It was a massive weapon but at no point does the episode point to power amplification for dark siders. This only makes Vader look worse off than anyone since he had ample time against Tano and was unable to hurt her in any significant way. They fought for a short time and she left. Somehow fighting Vader for a longer time without any injuries means worse for Maul. You're a damn fool. Biased, stupid, and weak.
The show doesn't need to point out everything for something like that to be pretty clear, and the fact that it's not explicitly stated doesn't mean much. There's even evidence and strong implications that Malachor is indeed a dark side nexus [both of which I provided above but you, yet again, conveniently ignored or dismissed without an actual counter-argument].
Lmao, you're pretty much the only one who believes Tano actually beat Vader, even with evidence stacked against you and you relying on a ridiculous cheap shot to declare her the winner, so I'm just really not going to bother arguing about this anymore with someone so mind-numbingly blind and so very much in denial. Hell, when the most loyal and arduous Ahsoka supporters [Joker and Beni] accept Ahsoka lost to Vader, you're left with absolutely zero credibility.
You know what means worse for Maul? The fact that Ahsoka managed to duel him on even grounds in spite of the fact that they were fighting on a dark nexus. Regardless of how Vader did against Ahsoka, Maul couldn't manage to get the upper hand over her despite the advantage. What do you have to say about that? You're just using Vader's performance as a scapegoat for how Maul fared against Ahsoka. Let me tell you something everyone already knows, and that you keep denying: Vader did better against Ahsoka than Maul could ever hope for.
Oh and keep calling me biased, you only further embarrass yourself. 👆
A duel ends with a winner. Vader never won and only delayed her. You are misrepresenting my argument because yours is so damn pitiful.
So delaying her means pushing her back, outdueling her and TKing her off the temple? Because, according to you, in no way does that demonstrate some sort of combative superiority over her, right? Oh yeah, that's right. The cheap shot = Ahsoka beating Vader.
God.
Vader has precognition, distance between the two, and a dark side nexus according to you. He was slow to react. I've made this claim about him before. 🙂
Guess who also has precognition, distance between them and a dark side nexus on his list of advantages against Kanan? Guess who was slow to react against Kanan? Let me give you a clue. His name starts with M and ends with aul.
Vader temporarily kept her away. If that's a definitive win to you then Vader lost to Ezra and Kanan.
When a definitive win to you = a cheap shot from behind, then it's very clear whose logic is faulty as ****.
I'm not going to go there because Zen already destroyed this idiotic argument in one single post, though. 🙂
He was overconfident and fell off.
Are you talking about when a blind Kanan pushed him off the Temple, or when Padawan Kenobi cut him in half?
He wasn't injured
The fact that he wasn't injured speaks of Maul's toughness and physical resistance. It has absolutely nothing to do with the actual duel.
and had already had Kanan dead to rights before Tano intervened.
It's already been established now that you use a fight's context to your convenience, but I'll gladly point it out again:
Kanan was as good as dead without Ahsoka because Maul blinded him via cheap shot. Kanan's defenses weren't even up, his lightsaber wasn't even ignited. Him blinding Kanan counts for nothing in Maul's favor. So Ahsoka intervening is irrelevant.
Tell you what let's meet. I get to blind you and you can push me off a short ledge in which I'm fine. You can brag about getting the better of me. Sound good ?
ROFL, this has got to be the most pathetic argument I've ever read coming from you, and that's saying something.
Maul blinded him for life. You're an idiot.
You're becoming desperate. It's hilarious.
And his opinion no matter how weighted isn't a fact.