Darth Vader and Exar Kun vs. SWTOR Vitiate

Started by S_W_LeGenD7 pages

Originally posted by Trocity
Vitiate would defeat either alone, but not both at once.

Vitiate's AoE attacks will get the job done.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Concession accepted.

**** you, mang. 🙂

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You make it sound like as if Darth Vader soundly defeated Starkiller. I recall the battle a bit differently. Momentary gains in a battle make no difference.

Darth Vader has nothing on Vitiate. Neither does Starkiller.

The creator outright stated that Vader let him win. And this is still before his prime.

Originally posted by Trocity
Vitiate would defeat either alone, but not both at once.

👆

Originally posted by The Ellimist
The creator outright stated that Vader let him win. And this is still before his prime.

Provide evidence.

http://www.swtor.com/community/showpost.php?p=8550447&postcount=5038

I always got the impression that Galen Marek > Starkiller. A clone could not be as powerful as the original.

I always felt that you are cancer.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I always felt that you are cancer.

Sorry to disappoint you but Galen Marek defeated Darth Vader, soundly.

Galen won because Vader underestimated him and Dun Möch.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Darth Vader and Exar Kun are not in the league of Vitiate. It is that simple.

As for the numbers; a single lion can kill two hyenas without much difficulty.

I think that's where we differ. I don't believe Vitiate outclasses either of them.

Also while your analogy was an interesting animal fact it doesn't have any relevancy to the actual fight.

@Zoltan: You understand that Galen's one and only attempt at Dun Moch failed and only served to enrage Vader and allowed him to land the only hits on Galen he got in the entire fight, right?

If you have evidence to the contrary I'd appreciate it if you posted it.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
I always got the impression that Galen Marek > Starkiller. A clone could not be as powerful as the original.

Galen is indeed more powerful then the Starkiller clone based on their relative performance against Vader and his ability to challenge Sidious.

The quote people have been using for years to say Starkiler and Galen are equals has recently been disproved.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
http://www.swtor.com/community/showpost.php?p=8550447&postcount=5038

The quote provided in the thread comes from Witwer someone who has no auority on canon. I've already addressed this in another thread yet you continue to bring it up to justify your idiotic stances.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
**** you, mang. 🙂

It's not my fault that Vitiate is terrible.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
The quote provided in the thread comes from Witwer someone who has no auority on canon. I've already addressed this in another thread yet you continue to bring it up to justify your idiotic stances.

I love how about a post with over 2k words all you can say is "nuuu, Witwur haz no canun authoritah".

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I love how about a post with over 2k words all you can say is "nuuu, Witwur haz no canun authoritah".

Concession accepted.

Underestimating someone is still a victory. You're dumb.

Originally posted by MS Warehouse
Underestimating someone is still a victory. You're dumb.

Doesn't make him better tho, and neither would he win a majority out of 10.

You're

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Doesn't make him better tho, and neither would he win a majority out of 10.

You're

Me: You're dumb
You: You're dumb.

Killer response 👆

Also, nobody said it makes him better but your only argument was that he won because he was underestimated. That's not an argument but good try.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I love how about a post with over 2k words all you can say is "nuuu, Witwur haz no canun authoritah".

Concession accepted.

Because I already spent hours of my life typing up posts in another thread that addressed the entirety of the post to the link you provided. I'm simply explaining to you why the section you quote specifically has no legs upon which to stand.

You are already aware of this of course but you'll pretend like you're not in an attempt to distract from the point, that being that you have no way to counter my point.