Originally posted by Surtur
I think it does suck because he didn't do anything to warrant being removed. Though this part:"I lived under Saddam Hussein. I know what discrimination feels like," he added."
Kind of made me chuckle.
Lol, let's not pretend like you haven't compared SJW's to Nazis and fascists before.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Lol, let's not pretend like you haven't compared SJW's to Nazis and fascists before.
Okay let's not pretend: quote me doing it. I'm struggling to remember anyone who I legitimately compared to a nazi.
Key word is legitimately. This guy wasn't f*cking around lol, he was dead serious. I don't even recall doing so jokingly, but it's possible. But to seriously say "this person is like a nazi" ?
Originally posted by Impediment
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/muslim-passenger-southwest-airlines-khairuldeen-makhzoom-arabic-phone-uncle-baghdad-cair-statement-a7347311.htmlPoor guy must feel humiliated.
Yay... What a bunch of *****.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay let's not pretend: quote me doing it. I'm struggling to remember anyone who I legitimately compared to a nazi.Key word is legitimately. This guy wasn't f*cking around lol, he was dead serious. I don't even recall doing so jokingly, but it's possible. But to seriously say "this person is like a nazi" ?
Your SJW petition had plenty of comparisons to supremacists, totalitarian states, etc., both in the statement and many of the comments.
And we're not Iraq, but that's because the Right doesn't have the power to turn us into one.
Okay so based on your last comment you officially have lost the right to question or insult the intelligence of anyone.
Also again: I wasn't being serious when comparing them to totalitarian states. I said serious times when I was legit like "no, these people are just like nazi's".
This guy said this comment seemingly being..100% serious.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Actually, from what I read about this in other articles, the woman that reported him was a Muslim and native Arabic speaker who herself was concerned about the content of the man's discussion.
The truth always comes out. Watch all the people on the other side vanish now.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Your SJW petition had plenty of comparisons to supremacists, totalitarian states, etc., both in the statement and many of the comments.And we're not Iraq, but that's because the Right doesn't have the power to turn us into one.
Actually you know what, if you mean my topic about social justice courses..I could not find any examples of me comparing them to nazi's or totalitarian states.
Not to say it never happened, but I couldn't even find me jokingly calling them nazi's or anything in that thread.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Get over it
lol.
Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Actually, from what I read about this in other articles, the woman that reported him was a Muslim and native Arabic speaker who herself was concerned about the content of the man's discussion.
Got any links? I'd be interested in reading them.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
All the esjw just vanished and popped smoke. Pr you can't change you're stance now since you rushed to judgement.
lol, my stance was that, based on the article being accurate, they'd be a bunch of ***** to kick him off.
If the article is inaccurate, then yes I can.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No you can't doesn't work that way. You and all the other liberals already rushed to judgment. You can't change your stance on rushing to judgement.
Because you get to decide what I can and can't do. Okay. And my initial post depends on the article being accurate. If it isn't, then obviously things change.
lol @ calling me a liberal though.
But I am hesitant about the whole "the woman who reported it was a Muslim." Since if she could understand him..and he apparently just said "god be with you" then wouldn't she have known he wasn't discussing anything bad?
So if it is true about her being a Muslim it would make me question whether or not all he really said was "god is good" and that he said nothing that could be interpreted as bad or as him being some kind of safety issue.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Because you get to decide what I can and can't do. Okay. And my initial post depends on the article being accurate. If it isn't, then obviously things change.lol @ calling me a liberal though.
Rushing to judgement, you cant change that, you can change your opinion after, but you can't change you and everyone else rushed to judgement.
Originally posted by Surtur
But I am hesitant about the whole "the woman who reported it was a Muslim." Since if she could understand him..and he apparently just said "god be with you" then wouldn't she have known he wasn't discussing anything bad?So if it is true about her being a Muslim it would make me question whether or not all he really said was "god is good" and that he said nothing that could be interpreted as bad or as him being some kind of safety issue.
She's either the kind of person that would report someone for being brown (which we know happens), or she reported him because he said something he really shouldn't have (which in this case would be a good thing).
I'm genuinely curious now as to which one is true.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Rushing to judgement, you cant change that, you can change your opinion after, but you can't change you and everyone else rushed to judgement.
Okay...