Hillary Clinton Blames Abe Lincoln for her lies

Started by Time-Immemorial7 pages
Originally posted by Its2016
so now were praising wikileaks?

馃槀馃槀馃槀

Busted.

All this "Clinton is the devil, she hates Honest Abe" aside, Lincoln was far from a saint as POTUS.

She was in on Scalia's assassination tho. So yea.

Well, add another one to the Clinton deadpool...

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008#searchresult

See Rob, you really dont care.

I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down From: John Podesta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM To: Steve Elmendorf <[email protected]> Subject:

Thanks Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.

Honestly, what exactly am I supposed to take from that?

Originally posted by Its2016
so now were praising wikileaks?

Whose praising WikiLeaks? This entire thread is predicated on the leak of this email. This entire discussion is based on the thread starter's characterization of this email. I simply posted an image of the actual email so that people could see for themselves what it says. I am not making any claims about the veracity of WikiLeaks. But what I am doing is calling into question the thread starter's characterization of what the email actually says.

I am calling into question your character for defending Hillary Clinton. Prove the email says Abe said to lie to people, I notice you are to much of a coward to try and defend anything else she has said馃槀

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Whose praising WikiLeaks? This entire thread is predicated on the leak of this email. This entire discussion is based on the thread starter's characterization of this email. I simply posted an image of the actual email so that people could see for themselves what it says. I am not making any claims about the veracity of WikiLeaks. But what I am doing is calling into question the thread starter's characterization of what the email actually says.
My problem is there is a lot of question with regard to these leaks. A lot. Nobody seems to care, nobody seems to even question them.

Originally posted by Its2016
My problem is there is a lot of question with regard to these leaks. A lot. Nobody seems to care, nobody seems to even question them.

Likely two main reasons:

-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue

-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play

Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.

Except that wont work Rob, the emails came from the campaign. What you just said is its the republicans fault for upholding the law. And not the Clintons fault for the law breaking and the content of the emails.

In other words blame everyone but the clintons.

Nice job

I really wish you'd read my post and take the words as I say them, not what you think I'm saying

My comment had nothing to do with excusing Clinton, it was about the ineffectualness of the emails and reasons therein.

Originally posted by Robtard
Likely two main reasons:

-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue

-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play

Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.

in other words:

Originally posted by Robtard

Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.

Headshot
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008#searchresult

Originally posted by Robtard
I really wish you'd read my post and take the words as I say them, not what you think I'm saying

My comment has nothing to do with excuses Clinton, it was about the ineffectualness of the emails and reasons therein.

So you didn't say "blame the republicans."

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you didn't say "blame the republicans."

In regards to why the American people don't give a shit anymore when they hear the words "Clinton emails", regardless of what they are. /point

Or see Basher's picture, it's 100% correct

Originally posted by Robtard
Likely two main reasons:

-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue

-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play

Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.

Okay, Podesta is joking about wet works meaning pool parties on the vineyard.

Its possible he wanted to get pissed on by a prostitute in Marthas Vineyard. Its also feasible, they murdered someone, Scalia, to remove the second amendment, celebrating on marthas vineyard. Were speculating, but your constant brushing under the rug is disturbing to me.

Theres also the email where Podesta calls Latin American politicians as "needy latinos" because their campaigns suck. You dont care. Theres also Hillarys brother with ties to gold mining in Haiti. Theres rumours of Hillary funding Saud government, and she knows they fund IS. Its kind of a big deal, even to a Michael Moore fan who wanted to understand Bushes linked to Bin Ladens.

Over 5 years ago, there was a user on this forum who talked about the Clintons a lot. He had a spidey avatar. I wonder what hes doing now, and maybe i should have paid more attention to him. Im only scratching the surface as to whats possibly going on.

Ok Rob, if there was an email saying "ok kill him" and a few days later that person wound up dead, you would say that is a coincidence, there is no proof she actually did it.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
in other words:

its kinda like when hillary claimed the right was conspiring against her husbands dick, and then we found out she was wrong. Her credibility is kinda.....shit.

Originally posted by Its2016
Okay, Podesta is joking about wet works meaning pool parties on the vineyard.

Its possible he wanted to get pissed on by a prostitute in Marthas Vineyard. Its also feasible, they murdered someone, Scalia, to remove the second amendment, celebrating on marthas vineyard. Were speculating, but your constant brushing under the rug is disturbing to me.

Theres also the email where Podesta calls Latin American politicians as "needy latinos" because their campaigns suck. You dont care. Theres also Hillarys brother with ties to gold mining in Haiti. Theres rumours of Hillary funding Saud government, and she knows they fund IS. Its kind of a big deal, even to a Michael Moore fan who wanted to understand Bushes linked to Bin Ladens.

Over 5 years ago, there was a user on this forum who talked about the Clintons a lot. He had a spidey avatar. I wonder what hes doing now, and maybe i should have paid more attention to him. Im only scratching the surface as to whats possibly going on.

Boyo, I was just giving you a reasonable reason why these wikileaks isn't skyrocketing and explaining to you that at this point, they're going to need an email from Clinton directly that is truly damning to have any affect on her campaign. This has nothing to do with loving or hating Clinton, it's just reality.

Mr. Parker? That guy was hilariously insane.