https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008#searchresult
See Rob, you really dont care.
I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down From: John Podesta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM To: Steve Elmendorf <[email protected]> Subject:Thanks Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.
Honestly, what exactly am I supposed to take from that?
Originally posted by Its2016
so now were praising wikileaks?
Whose praising WikiLeaks? This entire thread is predicated on the leak of this email. This entire discussion is based on the thread starter's characterization of this email. I simply posted an image of the actual email so that people could see for themselves what it says. I am not making any claims about the veracity of WikiLeaks. But what I am doing is calling into question the thread starter's characterization of what the email actually says.
Originally posted by Adam_PoEMy problem is there is a lot of question with regard to these leaks. A lot. Nobody seems to care, nobody seems to even question them.
Whose praising WikiLeaks? This entire thread is predicated on the leak of this email. This entire discussion is based on the thread starter's characterization of this email. I simply posted an image of the actual email so that people could see for themselves what it says. I am not making any claims about the veracity of WikiLeaks. But what I am doing is calling into question the thread starter's characterization of what the email actually says.
Originally posted by Its2016
My problem is there is a lot of question with regard to these leaks. A lot. Nobody seems to care, nobody seems to even question them.
Likely two main reasons:
-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue
-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play
Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.
Originally posted by Robtard
Likely two main reasons:-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue
-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play
Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.
in other words:
Originally posted by Robtard
Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.
Headshot
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008#searchresult
Originally posted by RobtardOkay, Podesta is joking about wet works meaning pool parties on the vineyard.
Likely two main reasons:-The Republicans beat the words "Email" and "Clinton" into the ground long ago, everyone except the most staunch Hillary haters is sick of hearing about "emails", even though these emails are an entirely different issue
-These wikileaks are mostly ridiculous so far. Aliens. Vague "wet works", which as we learned from the internet could mean piss-play
Honestly, blame the Republicans in jading the country to email scandals concerning Clinton. Wikileaks is going to need a solid email from Clinton doing something criminal that is believable, to have any real affect on her campaign.
Its possible he wanted to get pissed on by a prostitute in Marthas Vineyard. Its also feasible, they murdered someone, Scalia, to remove the second amendment, celebrating on marthas vineyard. Were speculating, but your constant brushing under the rug is disturbing to me.
Theres also the email where Podesta calls Latin American politicians as "needy latinos" because their campaigns suck. You dont care. Theres also Hillarys brother with ties to gold mining in Haiti. Theres rumours of Hillary funding Saud government, and she knows they fund IS. Its kind of a big deal, even to a Michael Moore fan who wanted to understand Bushes linked to Bin Ladens.
Over 5 years ago, there was a user on this forum who talked about the Clintons a lot. He had a spidey avatar. I wonder what hes doing now, and maybe i should have paid more attention to him. Im only scratching the surface as to whats possibly going on.
Originally posted by Its2016
Okay, Podesta is joking about wet works meaning pool parties on the vineyard.Its possible he wanted to get pissed on by a prostitute in Marthas Vineyard. Its also feasible, they murdered someone, Scalia, to remove the second amendment, celebrating on marthas vineyard. Were speculating, but your constant brushing under the rug is disturbing to me.
Theres also the email where Podesta calls Latin American politicians as "needy latinos" because their campaigns suck. You dont care. Theres also Hillarys brother with ties to gold mining in Haiti. Theres rumours of Hillary funding Saud government, and she knows they fund IS. Its kind of a big deal, even to a Michael Moore fan who wanted to understand Bushes linked to Bin Ladens.
Over 5 years ago, there was a user on this forum who talked about the Clintons a lot. He had a spidey avatar. I wonder what hes doing now, and maybe i should have paid more attention to him. Im only scratching the surface as to whats possibly going on.
Boyo, I was just giving you a reasonable reason why these wikileaks isn't skyrocketing and explaining to you that at this point, they're going to need an email from Clinton directly that is truly damning to have any affect on her campaign. This has nothing to do with loving or hating Clinton, it's just reality.
Mr. Parker? That guy was hilariously insane.