Hillary Clinton Blames Abe Lincoln for her lies

Started by Robtard7 pages
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok Rob, if there was an email saying "ok kill him" and a few days later that person wound up dead, you would say that is a coincidence, there is no proof she actually did it.

No, TI. That would be a reasonable conclusion and I'd support you 100%.

Someone saying "wet works" and then going "that means they murdered Scalia" isn't.

It actually is skyrocketing its all over the web.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, TI. That would be a reasonable conclusion and I'd support you 100%.

Someone saying "wet works" and then going 'That means they murdered Scalia" isn't.

So an email containing code words about an assassination and saying time to double down and buckle up, then a day later Scalia died from mysterious causes with no autopsy doesn't stink to high heaven?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
It actually is skyrocketing its all over the web.

Do you think what's been released so far will have any meaningful affect on her campaign?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So an email containing code words about an assassination and saying time to double down and buckle up, then a day later Scalia died from mysterious causes with no autopsy doesn't stink to high heaven?

Because the man was 79, out of shape and had previous medical problems. IIRC, the family were the ones that did not want an autopsy, as to not desecrate the body.

So no, it doesn't scream conspiracy to me, honestly.

Absolutely, Trump will lose the election to voter fraud, they already have video of republican ballots being torn up; by December, they will have sorted out the fraud and he will be the next president.

Originally posted by Robtard
Boyo, I was just giving you a reasonable reason why these wikileaks isn't skyrocketing and explaining to you that at this point, they're going to need an email from Clinton directly that is truly damning to have any affect on her campaign. This has nothing to do with loving or hating Clinton, it's just reality.

Mr. Parker? That guy was hilariously insane.

I know. Insanity is my thing now.

Also wondering if what you say may come out. I dont think Hillary is that dumb tho.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Absolutely, Trump will lose the election to voter fraud, they already have video of republican ballots being torn up. By December, they will have sorted out the fraud and he will be the next president.

Alright, cool. I don't think so, but kudos if you end up being correct.

So you think the American people are idiots and going to elect Hllary after her horrible record.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you think the American people are idiots and going to elect Hllary after her horrible record.

I do think Clinton will be the 45th POTUS, unless something drastic happens in the next few weeks.

Confused, you said Trump would lose and then win, so that implies that Clinton would be elected.

That is not what I said, nice try. I said through voter fraud she will win, temporarily.

"Nice try", you really need to stop making it out that I'm trying to play you in some manner. I opened up that sentence with "confused", meaning I had confusion in what you were saying.

Ok, well the election can go two ways, Trump in a landslide and he takes it right out.

Or its very close, and voter fraud on the left nets him the win.

Either way, I think he will be the next president.

Time to make America great again, cause right now it clearly isn't great.

I used to think that while Clinton would win, it would be a lot closer than people thought. ie no landslides. Now I'm starting to think Clinton will win by not maybe a landslide, but a rather large number, where she'll take 35+ states and many states with the larger electoral votes.

This is of course subject to change barring any new bombshells either way in the next few weeks.

Im pretty content in thinking itll be 300-240 for both candidates. The swing states are rather big this year.

If Trump loses, I predict a recount demanded and whatever tinfoil hat explanation other than hes a sore loser like actual voter fraud the media will refuse to tell us.

But whatever. Pass the popcorn.

Funny how you imply that if Clinton loses, she'll accept the lose with dignity and not scream "cheated!" like Trump is expected to, since he's already made the claim that he can only lose due to fraud.

Originally posted by Robtard
Funny how you imply that if Clinton loses, she'll accept the lose with dignity and not scream "cheated!" like Trump is expected to, since he's already made the claim that he can only lose due to fraud.
Look, Clinton is established politician, Trump barely has his own party on his side. A Trump win would basically mean almost the whole country voting for him and even then, it will be close. You have Republicans backing Hillary. Its hers to lose. Voter fraud is heavily in her favour. Trump is the Gore in this situation.

Originally posted by Robtard
Funny how you imply that if Clinton loses, she'll accept the lose with dignity and not scream "cheated!" like Trump is expected to, since he's already made the claim that he can only lose due to fraud.

She cant claim "cheated" because she has been cheating the entire time and you know this, unless you want to deny it. Even when it was revealed.

TBH wouldn't Hillary murdering Scalia just be another reason to vote for her? Wasn't he a huge piece of shit?

Dudes, taking the "Trump can only lose due to fraud" stance seems a bit, I dunno, sore loser-y? Whiny? Don't mean that to be insulting, just how it comes off.