Reevaluating the Sith (Legends)

I think we already told you that, but you didn't like the answer.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Apparently there's an elephant in the room: N is consistently called a Sith Lord by official sources... including the ones that say he dgaf about the Sith.

So how do you plan on getting around Babar?

You could always draw on the Nephthys Doctrine of Selective Facts.

I'm not trying to start a brigade Temp. I'm just honestly curious, what makes a Sith?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
I think we already told you that, but you didn't like the answer.

You told me it was employing and being taught Sith teachings which Set Harth does.

Or are you referring to Ant saying you need a master to be considered one?

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
There's way too many to even list. Which is what I'm saying. What qualifies you as a Sith? And no, I'm not talking about outside sources, in universe what makes a Sith a Sith?

Am I to infer from this that you concede the point that N is a Sith and is therefore Sheev's gimp-masked smashpiece but that you now want to engage in an intriguing epistemological discussion over what makes a Sith?

Sure.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Sure.

Good.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
You told me it was employing and being taught Sith teachings which Set Harth does.

Or are you referring to Ant saying you need a master to be considered one?

I mean, if you can't give me a good reason other then outside sources refer to him as one I'm not going to truly feel that way but honestly I don't care about the Nihilus brigade as of now.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
No I didn't, but I don't have the patience for another of your comprehension fails. 🙂

Originally posted by Beniboybling
That said as far as I'm aware none of the aforementioned names gave up Sith practices, so I'm not sure what your point is.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
comprehension fail

Such a pair of bullies.

Originally posted by The_Tempest
Good.

So I assume you're not actually going to discuss this with me?

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
I mean, if you can't give me a good reason other then outside sources refer to him as one I'm not going to truly feel that way but honestly I don't care about the Nihilus brigade as of now.

In other words, consistent evidence from numerous official sources be damned, your opponents need to satisfy an arbitrary personal threshold?

lmao

Originally posted by Beniboybling

What do you want Beni? Your other claim was some bullshit comparison between Sith and mathematicians. :/

Edit: Wait, were you trying to make some sort of statement about Tenebrous? :hmmm:

Originally posted by The_Tempest
In other words, consistent evidence from numerous official sources be damned, your opponents need to satisfy an arbitrary personal threshold?

lmao

Yiz. 🙂

Edit: That's the stance I've always held tbh.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
So I assume you're not actually going to discuss this with me?

I honestly didn't have any interest in the topic, no.
But now I have no actual reason to do so since you've all but admitted that the threshold for acceptable evidence is subject to change for arbitrary reasons.
Wouldn't be much point when you can just dismiss things you don't like.

Tempest is no man of his word. 🙂

Tempest is no man at all. 🙂

Syn had conceded the point so we're all ready to go home, yeah.

I never said I'd discuss this with you lol.

You make sure to phrase everything so carefully don't you?

Edit: Is it hard self monitoring all the time or has it become automatic over the years?