Originally posted by h1a8
Why troll me?
Please address my post. Don't ignore what I said and repeat your statements in a different form.There were only two men drinking beer. They finished several beers and was currently drinking one when Miyagi addressed them.
I answered your points. How bout you actually address my points instead of repeating your same nonsense and ignoring what I just said? Everyone here agrees that you've been dodging my arguments.
Some of these old posts...man what lowballing for IP Man, you guys realize who and what Twister did in IP Man 2 right?
You recall that Twister was able to fight and beat Master Hung, someone who previously was stalemating IP Man who had also beaten all the other martial arts masters that was with Hung, in order to prove to them that he could start a school. Twister was also the champion of the world in boxing, he also had a weight advantage and he clearly showed some great reflex and footwork.
I don't really get this thinking of lowballing boxing, there's a reason why it's been around for so long...it's effective. Not only that, IP Man wasn't handicapped until the 3rd round. Watching the 1st 2 Rounds, IP didn't even use his legs much and when he did, Twister was able to still handle himself just fine aside from the 2 instances where he was kicked in the face(which would hurt anyway so I dunno why that's an issue here.). Twister otherwise showed great speed, footwork, strength and durability.
Those Black Belts in the 1st movie, you also realize 3 of them also whooped Master Liu who was able to pretty much stomp any 1 of them solo and Master Liu also had a much better fight against The Northerner than any of the martial arts masters. Yet IP took on 10 of them at once.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I answered your points. How bout you actually address my points instead of repeating your same nonsense and ignoring what I just said? Everyone here agrees that you've been dodging my arguments.
You didn't address any of my points. You didn't even mention them. You just said that my points don't prove anything without actually explaining why? You have to address EACH ONE in order to attack my whole argument.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
Some of these old posts...man what lowballing for IP Man, you guys realize who and what Twister did in IP Man 2 right?You recall that Twister was able to fight and beat Master Hung, someone who previously was stalemating IP Man who had also beaten all the other martial arts masters that was with Hung, in order to prove to them that he could start a school. Twister was also the champion of the world in boxing, he also had a weight advantage and he clearly showed some great reflex and footwork.
I don't really get this thinking of lowballing boxing, there's a reason why it's been around for so long...it's effective. Not only that, IP Man wasn't handicapped until the 3rd round. Watching the 1st 2 Rounds, IP didn't even use his legs much and when he did, Twister was able to still handle himself just fine aside from the 2 instances where he was kicked in the face(which would hurt anyway so I dunno why that's an issue here.). Twister otherwise showed great speed, footwork, strength and durability.
Those Black Belts in the 1st movie, you also realize 3 of them also whooped Master Liu who was able to pretty much stomp any 1 of them solo and Master Liu also had a much better fight against The Northerner than any of the martial arts masters. Yet IP took on 10 of them at once.
These arguments are weak and don't prove anything. You are using faulty abc logic.
The reason why Miyagi wins is very simple.
1. He has the speed and reflexes to block and parry any attack by Ip. I proved by feats.
2. He demonstrated that he can counter simultaneously as he parries.
3. He never attacks first. He always wait to be attacked and counters.
Reason 3 is the greatest reason why he wins. Everyone here is ignoring that fact.
Originally posted by h1a8
These arguments are weak and don't prove anything. You are using faulty abc logic.The reason why Miyagi wins is very simple.
1. He has the speed and reflexes to block and parry any attack by Ip. I proved by feats.
2. He demonstrated that he can counter simultaneously as he parries.
3. He never attacks first. He always wait to be attacked and counters.Reason 3 is the greatest reason why he wins. Everyone here is ignoring that fact.
How are they weak? What I said is true and shouldn't just be dismissed, though frankly I don't really care much about the fight here, I was just wanting to clear all that stuff that was ignorantly said about Twister mostly and those black belts.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI'm doing a lot of posting. So I didn't think of the movie Miyagi is from. My mind didn't connect the two. I thought you made up some random universe where Georgia could exist.
In order for your mind to go straight to Val, you had to realize that KK stood for Karate kid. so what you're actually saying is that you didn't even recognize the name of the movie Miyagi is from.
Originally posted by h1a8
I'm doing a lot of posting. So I didn't think of the movie Miyagi is from. My mind didn't connect the two. I thought you made up some random universe where Georgia could exist.
IOW, I was right, you didn't recognize the name of the movie Miyagi is from.
BTW, what threads were you involved in at the time, I want to know what you consider lots of posting.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI have no idea. I didn't even think "KK is the movie Miyagi is from". I'm trained to think Val Armorr when KK is posted. So I thought that KK didn't make much sense so I couldn't be sure what you meant.
IOW, I was right, you didn't recognize the name of the movie Miyagi is from.
Originally posted by h1a8
I have no idea. I didn't even think "KK is the movie Miyagi is from". I'm trained to think Val Armorr when KK is posted. So I thought that KK didn't make much sense so I couldn't be sure what you meant.
Thank you for admitting that you didn't know the name of the movies Miyagi is from.
BTW, you forgot to mention the other threads you were involved in at the time to justify your claim that you were "posting a lot".
Originally posted by Silent MasterI did know the name. I just didn't realize you were referring to it.
Thank you for admitting that you didn't know the name of the movies Miyagi is from.BTW, you forgot to mention the other threads you were involved in at the time to justify your claim that you were "posting a lot".
I didn't say I posted in a lot of threads. I did a lot of posting in the Bane thread.
Originally posted by h1a8
I did know the name. I just didn't realize you were referring to it.I didn't say I posted in a lot of threads. I did a lot of posting in the Bane thread.
If you knew KK meant Karate Kid and further knew that Miyagi was from the Karate Kid universe, how come you didn't know that KK universe meant the universe Miyagi is from?
Not recently you haven't, so how is that an excuse for you being stumped by the term KK universe?
Originally posted by h1a8
You didn't address any of my points. You didn't even mention them. You just said that my points don't prove anything without actually explaining why? You have to address EACH ONE in order to attack my whole argument.
In other words, you need things spelled out for you. Why would I do that when you never addressed any of my posts? Heck you were so lazy that you only quoted yourself, not even bothering to address my points.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If you knew KK meant Karate Kid and further knew that Miyagi was from the Karate Kid universe, how come you didn't know that KK universe meant the universe Miyagi is from?Not recently you haven't, so how is that an excuse for you being stumped by the term KK universe?
I wasn't sure it meant Karate kid from DC. That was my first guess. It didn't dawn on me that it meant karate kid the movie with Daniel.
Originally posted by FrothByteThe burden was on me. That means I go first and you address my points. Not me address yours.
In other words, you need things spelled out for you. Why would I do that when you never addressed any of my posts? Heck you were so lazy that you only quoted yourself, not even bothering to address my points.