Originally posted by FrothByte
LOL. Here's a video that will make you eat your words.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbYFugAnKY0
Here are a few other examples of karatekas breaking the top off bottles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_BHcG5I12I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON5cmqskySg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aY4iT-yRqgSo what was that again about no humans being able to break the top off a bottle without knocking the bottle down? I hope you'll admit to being sorely mistaken now.
And please don't tell me that all those men I showed above have handspeeds of 200 mph.
Fake!
In the bottles there was a full amount of liquid. The liquid adds mass, which adds static friction force. Show me a non fake one where little to no liquid is inside.
Originally posted by h1a8
Fake!
In the bottles there was a full amount of liquid. The liquid adds mass, which adds static friction force. Show me a non fake one where little to no liquid is inside.
1. You never said the bottles had to be empty. You simply said it was impossible for humans to break the neck off bottles. I have proven you wrong. You could at least have the decency to admit your mistake.
2. Not all those bottles contained full amounts of liquid. You can see that some of them did not spill any liquid after getting hit.
3. There's no proof that the bottles Miyagi hit were empty. You made the claim that it was impossible to break bottles the way he did, I have proven you wrong. If you want to claim that they were EMPTY bottles then you have to prove they were empty.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. You never said the bottles had to be empty. You simply said it was impossible for humans to break the neck off bottles. I have proven you wrong. You could at least have the decency to admit your mistake.2. Not all those bottles contained full amounts of liquid. You can see that some of them did not spill any liquid after getting hit.
3. There's no proof that the bottles Miyagi hit were empty. You made the claim that it was impossible to break bottles the way he did, I have proven you wrong. If you want to claim that they were EMPTY bottles then you have to prove they were empty.
1. I'm sorry
2. All of them, that I saw, had liquid in them. Which ones didn't?
3. The bottles were empty, except the last one. The men drunk each bottle completely before opening a new bottle.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you accept my challenge?
In arguing a subjective argument? Hell no!
Looking pretty while fighting doesn't mean anything.
Ip Man got hit by boxer's speed. Miyagi can definitely counter attack him.
Miyagi has shown superhuman speed and perceptions with arrow catching and beer bottle breaking.
Miyagi doesn't attack first, he defends and counters instantly.
Bottomline: Miyagi's perceptions are superior and he will have little to no trouble defending and countering Ip Man.
Originally posted by h1a8
1. I'm sorry
2. All of them, that I saw, had liquid in them. Which ones didn't?
3. The bottles were empty, except the last one. The men drunk each bottle completely before opening a new bottle.
1. Accepted.
2. I didn't say they didn't have any liquid, I said they weren't full like you said
3. You need to prove they were empty. You simply saying they were empty is not proof.
Originally posted by Silent Master
The challenge was to have an unbiased mod view the fight scenes and give their opinion on which was more impressive, so you refusing the challenge is tantamount to admitting that Ip man has the better fighting feats.So, thank you for admitting that Ip man wins.
How does subjectively being more impressive translate into a win?
The Spurs are a boring basketball team but they have excellent chances to beat the flashiest team on any given day.
Look at would both can do and how they fight (their styles).
If Miyagi was a first attacker then I would give this fight to IP Man.
The problem here is that Miyagi will not attack first, Ip Man will. Miyagi will masterfully counter. He has the speed, perceptions, and smoothness to do it.
Unbias is an untruth. Many are bias to flashiness.