Darth Malak vs. Ahsoka Tano (Rebels) (Lightsabers only)

Duel takes place on neutral terrain

*Malak is unamped

Malak.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Malak.

Curious, but what's the actual case for Malak without resorting to author quotes?

Besting the greatest non-Revan Jedi of the era in under thirty seconds whereas Tano roughly stalemated an Inquisitor on Malahcor, lmfao.

Bastila's the greatest Jedi? 😬 EDIT: lol, k.

Ahsoka also held her own against Vader. And Maul.

Yeah. 👆

And Malak held his own against Revan.

Darth Revan, who isn't as good as Vader. Nor was it on a one-sided environment.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Darth Revan, who isn't as good as Vader.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWlrbtLlQZ8&t=0m45s

Huh. 👆

Because Revan beating non-Force sensitive elites like Mandalore and Yusanis is so great? 😂

You're getting what you deserve Nova. 🙂

Originally posted by SunRazer
Because Revan beating non-Force sensitive elites like Mandalore and Yusanis is so great? 😂

Mandalore or Yusanis would destroy the Inquisitors.

Vader beating Ahsoka, who's matched Maul, is better than those, lmfao. As is Maul conceding that he can't beat Vader alone.

You can't use Vader beating Ahsoka as proof that Ahsoka is good, champ.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
👆

Mandalore or Yusanis would destroy the Inquisitors.

Like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04V0nS8AP2g

Originally posted by SunRazer
Like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04V0nS8AP2g

I'd give them two seconds each.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
You can't use Vader beating Ahsoka as proof that Ahsoka is good, champ.

I wasn't making the comparison. But Maul conceding that he can't beat Vader, which is supported by Filoni, works fine. Likewise Ahsoka being at least equal to Maul works as well.

Originally posted by SunRazer
But Maul conceding that he can't beat Vader, which is supported by Filoni, works just as much.

We're getting off topic though. This is Tano vs Malak. 👆

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Probably a lot easier.

I'd give them two seconds each.

Based on what? Remember that they're amped.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Remember that they're amped.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Vader's supremacy over Old Master Maul wouldn't even afford him a victory over a Dollar Store cashier, lmfao.

We're getting off topic though. This is Tano vs Malak. 👆

lel

Let me rephrase, then. Ahsoka holding his own against Vader on a nexus is better than Malak holding his own against someone who's only beaten Mandalore and Yusanis. Vader's performance against Karbin and co. is probably already better than those, but superiority over Maul and equality with Obi-Wan doesn't hurt either.