Originally posted by SunRazer
Yes, tell me where.Yes, very.
We're discussing Vader vs Revan. Ahsoka contending with Vader > Malak ambiguously contending with Revan.
He didn't. He said he didn't know who'd win a fight.
Uh, their entries?
Cool.
Ahsoka contending with Vader is too circumstantial to be a feat.
Yeah, so he retracted his statement.
😮💨
--- --- ---
On a serious note though, Darth Malak is better than Ahsoka Tano.
Chris Avellone stated that Darth Revan is capable of besting both Darth Traya and the Jedi Exile at the same time in lightsaber combat - and Darth Malak is around Darth Revan's level as a swordsman. Ahsoka Tano has nothing on such an accomplishment. Her showings are highly circumstantial or inconsistent. It is amusing, though, that Bastila Shan is consistently hailed by two separate sources to have lightsaber capabilities around that of Dooku, and yet that's dismissed because "reasons." Frankly, Darth Malak putting down the second most powerful Jedi in the Order with such ease, who is capable of affecting thousands of individuals simultaneously with her telepathy, is beyond anything Canon Darth Vader has shown by any stretch of imagination. An average Dark Jedi has more to their name than an Inquisitor, also, and Bastila Shan handily put one down in a far quicker time than Ahsoka Tano did to the Fifth Brother.