Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
You don't get it do you Nova? By allowing him to run rampant with his wank and lowballing he now has Vader as a high mid tier at best. You unwittingly created a monster through your laxness and irresponsibility.To reiterate, you're getting exactly what you deserve.
What makes you think I'm responsible for reining him in? If Ellimist had actually continued the debate, Ant would've been humiliated and the Vader lowballing would've been flushed out 🙂
Heh.
Bastila Shan is hailed as a tier three double-bladed swordsmaster - a status exclusively held by Exar Kun and Darth Maul.
Note that Grievous is a mere tier two, so she's better than Grievous by a significant margin.
Now, Darth Malak put her down in what? Thirty seconds? And then Grievous, how long? I imagine something like twenty seconds.
And yet we have Ahsoka Tano practically stalemating a slightly-amped Inquisitor.
I could go the Revan-route too, but this comparison is sufficient enough. 😂
GG. 👆
Originally posted by SunRazer
What makes you think I'm responsible for reining him in? If Ellimist had actually continued the debate, Ant would've been humiliated and the Vader lowballing would've been flushed out 🙂
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Heh.Bastila Shan is hailed as a tier three double-bladed swordsmaster - a status exclusively held by Exar Kun and Darth Maul.
Note that Grievous is a mere tier two, so she's better than Grievous by a significant margin.
Now, Darth Malak put her down in what? Thirty seconds? And then Grievous, how long? I imagine something like twenty seconds.
And yet we have Ahsoka Tano practically stalemating a slightly-amped Inquisitor.
GG. 👆
Sorry, but is this more author quotes/Wizards of the Coast? Because unless I'm missing something, Bastila's probably tier 3 where Maul is a tier 8 and younglings and tier 1. 😂
Ahsoka drives them back pretty decisively, lol. In any case, that's clearly a low showing for story reasons given her performance against Maul and Vader later, and her earlier performance against the Inquisitors. Choose the odd one out.
Originally posted by SunRazer
What makes you think I'm responsible for reining him in? If Ellimist had actually continued the debate, Ant would've been humiliated and the Vader lowballing would've been flushed out 🙂
It's not SOLELY your fault. But everybody else is lazy or a troll. If you want to retain a justified superiority complex you're going to have to have to work for it.
Nah, KotORCG. 👆
Nah. She didn't stalemate Maul - it was a short skirmish. And against Vader, she had numerous advantages that were unique to the fight. It's not even a quantifiable showing.
So we have Ahsoka:
- Performing 5/10 against the Inquisitors their first fight
- Stalemating an Inquisitor their second fight
- Skirmishing Maul for a short duration and then breaking off
😉
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Nah, KotORCG. 👆Nah. She didn't stalemate Maul - it was a short skirmish. And against Vader, she had numerous advantages that were unique to the fight. It's not even a quantifiable showing.
Show me.
It was a minute against Maul.
lol But Mandalore and Yusanis, completely off-panel, are quantifiable? Don't forget that Revan was amped when he fought Mandalore.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Their stats list their level of double-bladed proficiency.Cool?
We're discussing Ahsoka, not Revan. 👆
Yes, tell me where.
Yes, very.
We're discussing Vader vs Revan. Ahsoka contending with Vader > Malak ambiguously contending with Revan.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Nah, Drew retracted that statement.gg
He didn't. He said he didn't know who'd win a fight. All author quotes aren't canon, anyways.