I like you Zoltan and it's the holidays - I wanna be nicer. 🙂
@Beni:
Proof he was exhausted? Not that it matters, given Zallow is Kao's superior, and Malgus bested him sans any sort or circumetances.
1. I meant Sidious is the most powerful Sith, and acknowledge Malgus unmatched battle field warrior, while listing him as one of his most powerful predecessors.
2, Because those Sith were noted as one of the best in a of Empire thousands, and the Lost Tribe are not really noted as being anythint more than your average Sith?
Originally posted by Deronn_soloHe went all-out against Malgus and Vindican for almost a minute, its only logical that his stamina would have taken a serious hit, and his death reflects that.
I like you Zoltan and it's the holidays - I wanna be nicer. 🙂@Beni:
Proof he was exhausted? Not that it matters, given Zallow is Kao's superior, and Malgus bested him sans any sort or circumetances.1. I meant Sidious is the most powerful Sith, and acknowledge Malgus unmatched battle field warrior, while listing him as one of his most powerful predecessors.
2, Because those Sith were noted as one of the best in a of Empire thousands, and the Lost Tribe are not really noted as being anythint more than your average Sith?
1. OK, fair enough.
2. Yeah you said that, but given the Sith among these pools of thousands and getting downed by Republic troopers, why should we care? In the grand scheme of things average would be being generous, they are shit.
There's a discrepancy with the animations regarding the Force lightning - their weapons are holstered while they are hit - and the Force push is just that, a Force push. Savage has Force pushed everyone worth their salt in TCW, even choked Dooku and Ventress at the same time, but it's not conclusive of much other than he's pretty powerful.
Originally posted by ILS
There's a discrepancy with the animations regarding the Force lightning - their weapons are holstered while they are hit - and the Force push is just that, a Force push. Savage has Force pushed everyone worth their salt in TCW, even choked Dooku and Ventress at the same time, but it's not conclusive of much other than he's pretty powerful.
I'm not discussing the validity of the feat since I agree it's irrelevant, just the fact there's no proof Darach was either tired or Malgus enraged and some people that applied this same logic before are now drowning in speculation.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
There is also the discrepancy regarding Malgus' inability to crush Darach prior despite having Vindican for back up.It's called employing logic in both cases, yeah.
This can be explained in a myriad of ways. I could even go and state Malgus was jobbing the 2 vs 1 or that Vindican actually hindered him. It has as much substance as your opinion. lmao
You didn't prove anything with your speculations and conjectures, dude. Don't bring logic to the mix when you can't prove your thesis.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Who cares? Lol. Taking that approach only renders the feat unusable.
lolwhat? The correct description of the feat is that Malgus defeated Darach after the Jedi killed Vindican and fended off Malgus before. It's perfectly usable.
If Darach was tired, if Malgus was enraged, if Malgus was jobbing, if Vindican hindered Malgus, if Malgus had cancer, if Malgus likes to drive over the speed limit, all them of are unproven speculations (pleonasm intended).
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Uh-huh, and unless you can prove that Malgus was jobbing before hand, that Darach wasn't exhausted and Malgus wasn't enraged then it's unusable evidence as an accurate reflection of his base talents. And you've just admitted that's the case, so gg darling.
There's no such thing as negative proof. The one who claims Darach was tired or that Malgus was enraged is the one who needs to prove his thesis. It's elementary logic, Beni. 😮
When you dismiss the feat due to possible mitigating factors, without proving them, you incur another logical fallacy. Beni, you disappoint me. 😮
I used the Malgus jobbing as an allusion to your own, flawed logic but with the intention of helping Malgus' case - it can't be proved.