Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Not a ***** fight 'cuz none of us [well, myself at least] is actually being serious right now.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
i would one-shot all of u irl
Originally posted by Beniboybling
mmmlmao
Since when giving a direct description of the feat is measuring it's quality for character debating? The fact Malgus defeated Darach is irrefutable. This is obviously suitable to application. If you want to introduce further events in the feat - and then avail it's quality - then you need to prove these new events actually happened.
Originally posted by |King Joker|
What the **** does malabarism mean
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
[B]Only when they pitfall into the ominous realm of ridiculousness.
i.e. "When they contradict my opinion."
I agree with Ant on little, but I don't find most of his arguments to be laughable.
I guess he's a bit more "grounded" than me in his opinions, yeah.
Actually, you made two replies in that debate, thus, not a one- shot.
Two-shot, then. Not a very admirable performance from you in any case.
Aside from that, even all-time greats have lost to peoole below their threshold, hardly indicative of much, tbh.
Excuses 🙂
Originally posted by TenebrousWayNot to this debate no, it doesn't prove anything in regards to his combative ability under normal circumstances. Or rather, it's bunk. So I refer the honourable gentleman to my previous question:
Since when giving a direct description of the feat is measuring it's quality for character debating? The fact Malgus defeated Darach is irrefutable. This is obviously suitable to application. If you want to introduce further events in the feat - and then avail it's quality - then you need to prove these new events actually happened.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Who cares?
Originally posted by aalyasecura95
dooku tried to mess with a grandmaster before and that didnt work out too well for him