Count Dooku vs Darth Malgus and Satele Shan

Started by |King Joker|8 pages

What the **** does malabarism mean

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Not a ***** fight 'cuz none of us [well, myself at least] is actually being serious right now.

Just sayin' that it's no wonder that everyone declines as debater, when that's the dominant discussion on the boards 🙂
Originally posted by Beniboybling
i would one-shot all of u irl

ur mum

Originally posted by Beniboybling
mmm

lmao

Since when giving a direct description of the feat is measuring it's quality for character debating? The fact Malgus defeated Darach is irrefutable. This is obviously suitable to application. If you want to introduce further events in the feat - and then avail it's quality - then you need to prove these new events actually happened.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
What the **** does malabarism mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOd-uBt48VY

Ok ok i see what you were going for

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
[B]Only when they pitfall into the ominous realm of ridiculousness.

i.e. "When they contradict my opinion."

I agree with Ant on little, but I don't find most of his arguments to be laughable.

I guess he's a bit more "grounded" than me in his opinions, yeah.

Actually, you made two replies in that debate, thus, not a one- shot.

Two-shot, then. Not a very admirable performance from you in any case.

Aside from that, even all-time greats have lost to peoole below their threshold, hardly indicative of much, tbh.

Excuses 🙂

Originally posted by TenebrousWay
Since when giving a direct description of the feat is measuring it's quality for character debating? The fact Malgus defeated Darach is irrefutable. This is obviously suitable to application. If you want to introduce further events in the feat - and then avail it's quality - then you need to prove these new events actually happened.
Not to this debate no, it doesn't prove anything in regards to his combative ability under normal circumstances. Or rather, it's bunk. So I refer the honourable gentleman to my previous question:

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Who cares?
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Not to this debate no, it doesn't prove anything in regards to his combative ability under normal circumstances. Or rather, it's bunk. So I refer the honourable gentleman to my previous question:

OK, lmao.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
i would one-shot all of u irl

I'm pretty sure I'd totally smash you.

I'm pretty sure I'd smash all of ur asses before getting my teeth knocked in. 😉

Everyones a toughguy on the internet 😉

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
I'd totally smash you.
not this again. 😮

You can smash me any time, DC. 🙂

In bed, that is.

You guys are so lewd. xD

Don't pretend you don't like it. We know you do.

Gay ass phag c-unts.

Zoltan's salty he'll never get to taste my sweet cherries.

Originally posted by aalyasecura95
dooku tried to mess with a grandmaster before and that didnt work out too well for him

"Grandmaster" title doesn't mean much in that Era, full of fodders. Did I say doesn't mean much? Oh, my mistake, that title literally means nothing. Zym, one of the greatest fodders and failures in the Order's history, was GM during that times. He was even more pathetic, then the idea, that Vitiate could be Sidious' superior,