Shazam! (2019)

Started by Kazenji109 pages
Originally posted by playa1258
DC has another winner on their hands. Funny and full of heart with a great performance by Levi.

Lol...where's that clown that wanted a dark & gritty Shazam.

^ That would stupid for Shazam.

Theyve nailed the tone and the character here (by the looks of it). The only thing to complain about is that it looks cheap, but it had a very small budget, and if it makes bank they can improve on that for the sequel.

Who would've thought making fun movies was going to make people want to watch them!!!?

I think i liked aquaman more, but this movie was still really fun

You can tell they spent more on Aquaman but I think Shazam was better. Though the visuals weren't that bad.

Sequels will have a bigger budget especially when Adam enters the picture.

Originally posted by playa1258
Sequels will have a bigger budget especially when Adam enters the picture.

Only if this one makes a ton of money.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
You can tell they spent more on Aquaman but I think Shazam was better. Though the visuals weren't that bad.

Aquaman had one of the best CGI in comic movie history....

Good start for SHAZAM. Also, 7.9 on metacritic.

Warner Bros.’ Fandango preview screening yesterday at 1,200 struck lightning with a $3.3M gross besting the paid-preview figures of DreamWorks Animation-Fandango preview of How to Train Your Dragon 3 ($2.6M), Atom & Amazon’s WB preview of Aquaman ($2.9M), and Atom/Amazon’s previews of Sony’s Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle ($1.8M) and Hotel Transylvania 3 ($1.3M)

Not bad though I don't see Shazam beating Aquaman opening weekend. He's even less known that Aquaman.

It's not about being well known anymore. GOTG is not as well known as Aquaman, and they did 800 ww. People just want fresh takes on characters.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
It's not about being well known anymore. GOTG is not as well known as Aquaman, and they did 800 ww. People just want fresh takes on characters.
I agree to an extent but Guardians had the Marvel tag on it and that helps it a lot. I don't think DC is there as of yet but they seem to be gaining ground on Marvel movie wise.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
I agree to an extent but Guardians had the Marvel tag on it and that helps it a lot. I don't think DC is there as of yet but they seem to be gaining ground on Marvel movie wise.

Theyll make more than mcu phase 2. SHAZAM will push them past 5 billion.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Theyll make more than mcu phase 2. SHAZAM will push them past 5 billion.
I haven't checked Rottentomatoes yet but I noticed stilt hasn't been posting score updates yet so it must be doing good.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
You can tell they spent more on Aquaman but I think Shazam was better. Though the visuals weren't that bad.

The CGI in Aquaman was good and it had a decent story to carry it, Unlike alot of other movies that have gone overboard on the CGI and forget about the story and character's.

looks like lightning will strike twice for dc.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Theyll make more than mcu phase 2. SHAZAM will push them past 5 billion.

Thats not what he was saying. He was comparing brand names.

Btw MCU Phase 2 started with IM3 which made more than Aquaman.

YouTube video

Spoiler free review from AJ

Saw Shazam. It was funny at times. When it was gud it's gud, but when it was bad it was bad. The CG designs.... Ughhhh...
Still fun overall. I think I preferred Momoaman.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Thats not what he was saying. He was comparing brand names.

Btw MCU Phase 2 started with IM3 which made more than Aquaman.

I know what he was saying. I'm not looking at one film, though.