Rank Superman Among Marvel Heralds.

Started by Zack M7 pages
Originally posted by Magnon
Higher than Thanos, that's for sure.

Thanks is not worthy.

Originally posted by carver9
WTF...Leo doesn't make one bit of sense. I would love to know what showings he is talking about that puts him above marvel elites.

Playing dumb is just as bad as outright lying, you do know that right?

Originally posted by JBL
I think marvel showed it when Venom beat supes azz.lol
😂

Marvel is the number one company in comics. They don't need any DC characters since they are already kicking their asses.

Originally posted by SquallX
Playing dumb is just as bad as outright lying, you do know that right?

playing dumb? lol yeah, that's what he does..... anyway, he, as is the norm, failed to comprehend what i said, and on top of that, it sounds like he's complaining about a lack of feats for......superman. 😐

😂 but apparently i'm the one not making sense. jeebus. anyway, that post of his is right up abhi's alley but you're right--he knows as well as anyone the feats that superman has. i'd love it if you could refrain from quoting him though, so i don't inadvertently read his complete idiocy. if it's not too much trouble. 👆

To answer the question asked in the OP, Superman would absolutely be in the top 10 Marvel Heralds...

To suggest anything else would be trolling...

Originally posted by quanchi112
😂

Marvel is the number one company in comics. They don't need any DC characters since they are already kicking their asses.

That's what these D.C. **** boys can't accept. They act like Marvel owes them something- Marvel doesn't owe them anything accept a decades long ass kicking. Maybe pot to piss in.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Far behind or just behind?

No, not far behind at all. He'd be with Kallark and Hype.

Originally posted by leonidas
😂

he'd be in the exact same class as ss/thor. behind blue marvel? good lord.... fact is, marvel has no one like him. the history he has literally dwarfs the history of marvel as a whole. i could see them pushing him to the very top initially, then backing off a little bit, but his stature in comic lore would assure him a spot among the arguably most powerful in marvel. at least at first, until they decided to demean his history like they seem to have done with several of their main characters of late. i'm actually amazed that the discussion has gone on this long. imo marvel would kill to have superman in their line-up.

question--do you think if they had a choice they'd bring over superman, or batman? or as things are going now, might they choose wonder woman over both?? (she'd make for a better case of discussion per the stips of this thread--be interesting to see where she'd be ranked).

He's ****ing history in abother comic universe would have shit to do with his ranking. His ranking would be based on his physical prowess demonstrated in Marvel.

Originally posted by darthgoober
The reason Marvel has so many Superman clones is because they can't match the success/popularity of the original. As soon as they got Supes they'd do away with virtually all the clones and Supes would fill all their spots only minus the jobbing. He'd def be one of Marvel's premier elites, he just wouldn't be the cornerstone of the company the way he is in DC.

That is COMPLETELY false. Marvel has never tried create a hero to dominate above others. Gladiator and Hyperion were introduced as VILLAINS.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit being silly. He'd be a peer to Gladiator. That's it.

No question

Top 3 for sure.

Above.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
That is COMPLETELY false. Marvel has never tried create a hero to dominate above others. Gladiator and Hyperion were introduced as VILLAINS.

You do know the original concept of Superman was as a super villain right? They only later changed it because he was too powerful.

Originally posted by leonidas
playing dumb? lol yeah, that's what he does..... anyway, he, as is the norm, failed to comprehend what i said, and on top of that, it sounds like he's complaining about a lack of feats for......superman. 😐

😂 but apparently i'm the one not making sense. jeebus. anyway, that post of his is right up abhi's alley but you're right--he knows as well as anyone the feats that superman has. i'd love it if you could refrain from quoting him though, so i don't inadvertently read his complete idiocy. if it's not too much trouble. 👆

I like Carver most of the times, but when he writes shits like that, he needs to be called out on them.

I'll also refrain from quoting him so you're brain won't overload. 😛

😂 u da best. 👆

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
No question
👆

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
That is COMPLETELY false. Marvel has never tried create a hero to dominate above others. Gladiator and Hyperion were introduced as VILLAINS.

I never said that Marvel had tried to push one above all others, in fact I said the opposite. When I said Superman clones I meant the flying brick archtype that are obvously based on Supes. And despite their origins, Glads and Hype are obviously more than simple villains, yet they never really catch on with Marvel's mainstream fans. That's why we keep getting new versions of Hyperion... cause they always end up tanking.

BAV is confused. lol

Originally posted by carver9
PERHAPS the most powerful hero on either Earth's. PERHAPS. It's like me using Superman statement of Hulk being the most powerful being he has ever fought.

Strongest, not most powerful.

And yes, go ahead and prove Reed Richards wrong.

He's the only one who can beat Thanos.