Originally posted by SurturI never say it does, but you should actually see the specific examples to say whether or not 'the things I tend to pull' hold true. And I'm inclined to believe in the former.
Nor does shouting triggered or "you said no you!" or any of the other stuff you tend to pull. I am genuinely curious if you're aware of that?
Originally posted by SurturSo there's a world of difference between giving people who haven't harmed a child, know it's wrong, but just happen to struggle with a sexual attraction to them the opportunity to speak and Milo defending and praising pederasty, which is the charge being leveled against him. I'm not defending Salon, but it's not really hypocrisy.
To point out the hypocrisy, boom. No more, no less. Never said Milo can never be discussed, or any of the pearl clutching that went on.Now did you have any further questions about my motivations? I would be happy to clear up any confusion you may have.
Originally posted by NemeBro
So there's a world of difference between giving people who haven't harmed a child, know it's wrong, but just happen to struggle with a sexual attraction to them the opportunity to speak and Milo defending and praising pederasty, which is the charge being leveled against him. I'm not defending Salon, but it's not really hypocrisy.
Lol the guy said he was so turned on babysitting the young girl he had to go jerk off in the bathroom. He's a f*cking creep. Either it's wrong or it's not. You don't give platforms to dipshits like that and then whine when Milo gets one, unless you're a piece of hypocritical shit and YEP, Salon has whined about Milo in the past.
Oh, and that's just one example(the salon thing) about this weird thing with being attracted to younger folk being more accepted by creeps on the left. See: hypocrites like Meryl Streep applauding Roman Polanski. But Trump is bad cuz he mocked a disabled reporter(he actually didn't, but facts smacts*).
*No, before anyone says it, nope: he didn't mock the reporter. He has used similar hand gestures to describes loads of people, none of them disabled.
Enjoy:
Oh and you're kinda missing another point about hypocrisy Neme: it's one thing if Salon just deleted those articles about them and their dipshit creepy pedo just cuz they figured the world at large would be looking more into that stuff with the Milo thing and they wanted to avoid it.
It's another thing if they deleted their articles about it so they could thus move forward whining further about Milo's current situation, correct?
Pop quiz: will I find a story about this on Salon, about Milo's pedo stuff? Heh, we both know the answer(It's yes in case you shockingly don't).
Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos under fire after seemingly condoning sex with minors
Some in the comments section, rightfully, call Salon out on their utter bullshit and utter hypocrisy. Now if only we could get Meryl Streep to come out against Milo specifically, that would be icing on the hypocrisy cake.
Originally posted by NemeBro
So there's a world of difference between giving people who haven't harmed a child, know it's wrong, but just happen to struggle with a sexual attraction to them the opportunity to speak and Milo defending and praising pederasty, which is the charge being leveled against him. I'm not defending Salon, but it's not really hypocrisy.
Oh it's like that is it? Mission creep it's not going to just end there.