Also, from what we know, Milo hasn't harmed a child either. He also hasn't talked about getting so turned on by a five yr. old girl while babysitting her that he had to go jerk off in the bathroom. Milo himself suffered sexual abuse as a kid.
Also the way the guy in question described the 5 yr. old girl about the way she moved and her maturity was CREEPY as f*ck. I'd show it to you, but the cowards deleted it.
Originally posted by Surtur
Also, from what we know, Milo hasn't harmed a child either. He also hasn't talked about getting so turned on by a five yr. old girl while babysitting her that he had to go jerk off in the bathroom. Milo himself suffered sexual abuse as a kid.Also the way the guy in question described the 5 yr. old girl about the way she moved and her maturity was CREEPY as f*ck. I'd show it to you, but the cowards deleted it.
FFS, you're still whining and trying to defend Milo by deflecting onto other creeps. He's still a creep though; doesn't matter how many fingers you point at others. Get over it already; pick a new hero and move on with your life.
Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, you're still whining and trying to defend Milo by deflecting onto other creeps. He's still a creep though; doesn't matter how many fingers you point at others. Get over it already; pick a new hero and move on with your life.
Triggered again? Let it go bro, follow your own advice and move on.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol the guy said he was so turned on babysitting the young girl he had to go jerk off in the bathroom. He's a f*cking creep. Either it's wrong or it's not.
Do you believe he should kill himself because of the urges he can't control Surtur?
And no, you're not thinking rationally here and are being controlled by your emotions. Your gut reaction to pedophilia is making you equate the two when they are not equitable.
This pedophile made it very explicit that the urges he felt were wrong, and acting on them would be even more wrong, and all he wanted was the ability to be able to acknowledge his pedophilia without being harassed and discriminated against. Now, you can disagree with that all you want (I'm not sure where I'd stand on that particular issue, on one hand he can't control it but I'm not sure making pedophiles feel better [or rather, letting them be more open so they aren't repressing so much] is worth the possible safety risks, there'd need to be serious study on that), but the charge being thrown at Milo is that he literally condones pederasty, as in, having sex with sexually boys. Do you see the difference between being a pedophile, being ashamed of it, but wanting to be able to identify as one openly and keep yourself from being discriminated against is not even NEAR the same ballpark as openly endorsing dicking thirteen year old boys lol.
You don't give platforms to dipshits like that and then whine when Milo gets one, unless you're a piece of hypocritical shit and YEP, Salon has whined about Milo in the past.
The difference is that what Milo is saying now and a lot of what he's said has been interpreted as being harmful, as in, his words can incite harm. Condoning pederasty is obviously an example of this, but the pedo wasn't actually doing that. He wasn't a member of NAMBLA saying that men should be able to enter "consensual relationships" with young boys. It's not really hypocrisy.
Oh, and that's just one example(the salon thing) about this weird thing with being attracted to younger folk being more accepted by creeps on the left. See: hypocrites like Meryl Streep applauding Roman Polanski. But Trump is bad cuz he mocked a disabled reporter(he actually didn't, but facts smacts*).
You are literally using one woman's hypocrisy and trying to tout it as an example of "the left's" hypocrisy. Meryl Streep is not representative of every viewpoint of the left. She isn't even really a spokeswoman for a single aspect of the left like Milo is. She's certainly well-respected, but it's less for her political views and more for her being basically the most accomplished actress on the planet. The problem you're describing isn't even a leftist one. It's a problem of people in Hollywood sticking up for their own even when the guy they're sticking up for is a monster.
Like, have you ever heard of anyone that isn't a celebrity, liberal or not, praising Roman Polanski except for maybe acknowledging that he makes good movies?
I'm also not sure that applauding a frankly very good movie's director getting an award that he probably deserved is hypocritical in the least. A good act (if you call making a good movie a good act) does not wash away the bad, nor the bad the good. Chris Benoit killing his wife, child, and then himself doesn't change the fact that he was one of the best professional wrestlers to work in the business tbh imo fam.
Originally posted by SurturI've already detailed why this isn't really hypocrisy friend.
Oh and you're kinda missing another point about hypocrisy Neme: it's one thing if Salon just deleted those articles about them and their dipshit creepy pedo just cuz they figured the world at large would be looking more into that stuff with the Milo thing and they wanted to avoid it.It's another thing if they deleted their articles about it so they could thus move forward whining further about Milo's current situation, correct?
Pop quiz: will I find a story about this on Salon, about Milo's pedo stuff? Heh, we both know the answer(It's yes in case you shockingly don't).
Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos under fire after seemingly condoning sex with minors
Some in the comments section, rightfully, call Salon out on their utter bullshit and utter hypocrisy. Now if only we could get Meryl Streep to come out against Milo specifically, that would be icing on the hypocrisy cake.
Letting a pedo who adamantly is against acting on your urges speak and using your platform to openly encourage pedophilia are not the same thing.
Originally posted by SurturPedophilia is indeed creepy as ****, but then if someone who was really into coprophilia described in exquisite detail how they liked to play with their partner's shit you'd be disgusted as well (I almost vomited writing this, poop actually disgusts me more than the pedo's words did, and I did see that article so I vaguely recall them, poop is gross holy shit I want to kill myself), though I don't think you'd be so quick to encourage discriminating against them for their disgusting sexual habits, would you?
Also, from what we know, Milo hasn't harmed a child either. He also hasn't talked about getting so turned on by a five yr. old girl while babysitting her that he had to go jerk off in the bathroom. Milo himself suffered sexual abuse as a kid.Also the way the guy in question described the 5 yr. old girl about the way she moved and her maturity was CREEPY as f*ck. I'd show it to you, but the cowards deleted it.
I don't see the relevance in Milo suffering sexual abuse as a kid.
Also, for the record, I don't believe Milo actually endorses pederasty, and I don't really know why you've been so easily baited by everyone into trying to distance yourself from supporting him, leading to you being mocked. It would have been fairly easy to construct a solid and believable argument for why he doesn't condone pederasty and simply said something stupid that was very easy to interpret as such. His career is probably over due to his stupidity, but that doesn't mean you personally have to distance yourself from him, lol.
I've deliberated phrased my description of Milo's actions as being alleged to have condoned pederasty, rather than actually doing it (George Takei actually apparently does and that's sick and not cool ftr), because, as far as we can tell, the people criticizing Milo believe he does. They are likely wrong about Milo, but not necessarily hypocrites.
Lol dude, it would have been easy to construct a solid and believable argument? Come on now. I'm not disagreeing with you on that in general, but I would like you to look around where you're at. These people do not give a shit.
Go on, make this believable argument to Rob who was saying Milo rapes kids and shit. See what he says lol.
Remember, the logic put forth at one point was that I think pedophiles are necessary because, before this was revealed, I'd said Milo was necessary. Which is fine, but are these people who are interested in reason?
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol dude, it would have been easy to construct a solid and believable argument? Come on now. I'm not disagreeing with you on that in general, but I would like you to look around where you're at. These people do not give a shit.Go on, make this believable argument to Rob who was saying Milo rapes kids and shit. See what he says lol.
Did I say Milo actively "rapes kids and shit"? My concerns were that he apparently condones the behavior/pederastry; you seemed to agree and why you distanced yourself, while still trying to defend the turd.
Nemebro is free to believe that. edit: I read part of the transcript, and unless they were edited, it does seem like Milo is a condoner, he just chooses to distinguish the act as something else (see my *note above)
That's just weirder then though, as you're effectively going back now on believing Milo is a condoner. Yes?
Originally posted by Robtard
First I heard of it. What exactly is he saying he did?
Heh:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/arts/television/bill-maher-milo-yiannopoulos-interview.html?_r=0
Oh and I shit you not: clips from Politically Incorrect that apparently have him condoning a sexual relationship between an adult and a 14 yr. old are also surfacing lol.
To be fair his were about a male/female relationship though, but still.