Supergirl vs. MCU Thor

Originally posted by Robtard
That would sort of play into the building/metal having something to do with it.

We're not talking about reality, we're talking about a fictional alien and his techno-magic hammer which can summon and do stuff with lighting.

But if we want to get all sciency and realistic, metal can hold an electrical charge. eg have you ever been shocked by static electricity with say a metal door knob?

Oh I agree that metal can hold an electric charge. I'm just saying it can't amplify it. So the strength of the lightning strike still comes all from Thor.

As far as talking about fictional beings, yes it's a fictional movie but they are still grounded in reality unless specifically mentioned or shown that they're not. For example, we are shown (and given explanation) why Captain America is stronger than the average human. That does not mean that every chair they sit on now has the capability to sing.

Same with Thor. Just because we have a godlike being who can generate lightning doesn't mean that metal alloys in this universe change their intrinsic properties and can somehow amplify electricity without explanation.

Oh, maybe I misspoke, I was saying he used the building to store and then release and maintain his lighting for longer than he can normally do when I said "amplify", as the other lighting attacks where never close to being that long or large.

I wasn't trying to say that his lighting was made more powerful, like saying if his normal lighting amperage is 10(making this up), he was somehow 50 in that scene.

But lighting amperage does vary from storm to storm, lighting doesn't have a constant. No idea where Thor's ranks at.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, maybe I misspoke, I was saying he used the building to store and then release and maintain his lighting for longer than he can normally do when I said "amplify", as the other lighting attacks where never close to being that long or large.

I wasn't trying to say that his lighting was made more powerful, like saying if his normal lighting amperage is 10(making this up), he was somehow 50 in that scene.

But lighting amperage does vary from storm to storm, lighting doesn't have a constant. No idea where Thor's ranks at.

Well it's possible. I somehow feel that electricity doesn't function that way, that you can't use metal to store a charge temporarily and then redirect that back to the original charge and making it more powerful. I feel like it will still end up being the same voltage/amperage. But I'm not an electrical engineer so I will let this matter drop.

As long as we both agree that the metal didn't amplify the charge and at most just stored it (which could or couldn't mean that it made the charge more powerful) then we're good.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, maybe I misspoke, I was saying he used the building to store and then release and maintain his lighting for longer than he can normally do when I said "amplify", as the other lighting attacks where never close to being that long or large.

Hmm suppose that is possible. Still think the Sokovia blast was more powerful anyway.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Hmm suppose that is possible. Still think the Sokovia blast was more powerful anyway.

Originally posted by h1a8
It was a shared feat. We have no idea how much Thor contributed. The engines were overloaded and unstable. A large mass will always crumble in a domino effect when unstable. For example, lifting a building will cause it to crumble.

And yes, the island crumbled. But the shockwave that demolished the surface was purely Thor. Watch the movie, it's clear to see.

Originally posted by FrothByte
And yes, the island crumbled. But the shockwave that demolished the surface was purely Thor. Watch the movie, it's clear to see.

No it wasn't. It was the energy that was already put into the engines. Thor started the chain reaction and help release the latent energy that was in the island. Otherwise, there was no point in showing IM overloading the engine in conjunction to telling Thor to then do his part.

Still waiting for you to post a clip of Supergirl hitting with millions of tons of force.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Still waiting for you to post a clip of Supergirl hitting with millions of tons of force.

She has that capability because she was able to lift a million ton key casually.

Show a clip of her hitting with millions of tons of force.

Originally posted by h1a8
No it wasn't. It was the energy that was already put into the engines. Thor started the chain reaction and help release the latent energy that was in the island. Otherwise, there was no point in showing IM overloading the engine in conjunction to telling Thor to then do his part.

Chain reaction happened when Thor's Lightning met the reactor core.

But the whole initial disintegration of the top of the landscape was all Thor.

so will H1 use last night's showing of

Spoiler:
Kara speedblitzing the water tank

hahahahaha

Originally posted by h1a8
She has that capability because she was able to lift a million ton key casually.

Literally my only reply I'm making to your inanity, because you just never stop.

Originally posted by h1a8
She has that capability because she was able to lift a million ton key casually.

This is like saying Mariusz Pudzianowski could beat every single MMA fighter easily because he can lift a lot more than they can. However, we know that even though you're a strongman champion you can still lose in a fight against weaker opponents, just as his MMA record shows.

Lol, Supergirl could bitchslap Thor's face off. She's far stronger and faster than him.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Lol, Supergirl could bitchslap Thor's face off. She's far stronger and faster than him.

Except she struggles with opponents that Thor would steamroll through. Supergirl is stronger and faster but she's a very crappy fighter.

She only needs one punch.

The whole fight would be this:

Originally posted by Nephthys
She only needs one punch.

The whole fight would be this:

Thing is, Thor actually has demonstrated stronger destructive output than her. Thor's single charged hammer strikes/lightning strikes have shown stronger force than any of her single punches, kicks or attacks.

Have you noticed that the people who say things like Supergirl can one shot Thor, never seem to post any fighting clips of her hitting with that level of force?

Originally posted by Nephthys
She only needs one punch.

The whole fight would be this:

That would have meant a whole lot more if it was a clip of Supergirl doing that punch.