Terminator: Dark Fate

Are you seriously using RT as proof of anything?

Ghostbusters 2016 has a RT critic score of 75%

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016

Rotten Tomatoes tweaks audience ratings system to thwart online trolls

but you knew that, didn't you? of course you did 😂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-rotten-tomatoes-audience-ratings-20190226-story.html

but you knew that, didn't you? of course you did 😂

According to RT Black Panther is the greatest movie ever made. Anyone who seriously trusts that site should stick to watching cartoons.

it's nice that we can agree on something...but what do you have against cartoons?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-rotten-tomatoes-audience-ratings-20190226-story.html

but you knew that, didn't you? of course you did 😂

👆

Exactly. I coudlnt have made it more clear that it was based on votes from people who have been Verified to have seen the film.

The greatest movie of all time is subjective, but it should never include Black Panther.

Just like Ghostbusters 2016 critic score.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like Ghostbusters 2016 critic score.

Which has an audience score of 50%.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like Ghostbusters 2016 critic score.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Which has an audience score of 50%.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Which has an audience score of 50%.

Yes, but I was comparing the critic score 70% vs 74%

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's nice that we can agree on something...but what do you have against cartoons?

Nothing, they're just made for a simpler audience, like Rotten Tomato users.

RT can be interesting to look at the scores and compare the critic to audience scores.

For example the latest Dave Chappelle special speaks volumes. 35% from critics, 99% from the audience. Why such a yuge disparity? What about it did the critics hate that non-critics seemed to love?

Look at Batwoman. 72% vs 12%. Again, what are the critics seeing that the normal audience is not?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Nothing, they're just made for a simpler audience, like Rotten Tomato users.

I'm not sure about all that, but at least we agree that people who trust the RT user scores are a special kind of stupid

no offense to surt 🙂

Noting the scores isn't the same as trusting them, son 🙂

But the critic vs audience score will always be fascinating.

Originally posted by Surtur

For example the latest Dave Chappelle special speaks volumes. 35% from critics, 99% from the audience. Why such a yuge disparity? What about it did the critics hate that non-critics seemed to love?

Look at Batwoman. 72% vs 12%. Again, what are the critics seeing that the normal audience is not?

You clearly implied trust by attempting to pass it off as valid data.
Now throw a fit, special guy. "REEEEEEE"

Lol no I didn't. Want another shot? Also convenient you edited out the first line 👆

have fun playing your baby games, squirt. everyone can see that you said what you said