Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, but I was comparing the critic score 70% vs 74%
Two very different franchises though. I was only comparing with previous Terminator films for the critic score.
And Verified audience score is high, something Ghostbusters did not have.
That said, I thought Ghostbusters 2016 was alrite, so whatever.
Originally posted by Surtur
RT can be interesting to look at the scores and compare the critic to audience scores.For example the latest Dave Chappelle special speaks volumes. 35% from critics, 99% from the audience. Why such a yuge disparity? What about it did the critics hate that non-critics seemed to love?
Look at Batwoman. 72% vs 12%. Again, what are the critics seeing that the normal audience is not?
This has a much higher audience score though than it does critic score. Verified as well.
And a decent critic score on top isnt exactly a bad thing.
Originally posted by Surtur
Makes you wonder though...why didn't Wonder Woman get this kind of treatment from people? What is the difference?
Does make me wonder as well. Given I can easily pull out multiple lines of dialogue from that film about Men being the problem.
My guess is because she didnt take over from a previous hero who was male. But I also do think the anti-woke movement is going overboard now.
Like why not just criticise whats wrong with a film instead of putting the blame on a generic woke agenda?
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Does make me wonder as well. Given I can easily pull out multiple lines of dialogue from that film about Men being the problem.My guess is because she didnt take over from a previous hero who was male. But I also do think the anti-woke movement is going overboard now.
Like why not just criticise whats wrong with a film instead of putting the blame on a generic woke agenda?
Those lines are from Amazons that barely appear in the movie. Throughout the film WW defends mankind and thinks they are only evil because of Ares. She slowly learns this isn't the case. And please pluck out some cringe worthy anti-man dialogue from the movie as an example. Also your logic here makes no sense because people wouldn't have known about any of those lines anyways prior to the release of the film.
And if having a woke agenda is part of what is wrong with the film...what then?
And let me tell you why WW didn't get the same treatment: Gal Gadot wasn't whining prior to the films release and the film wasn't being preachy and trying to shove the fact she is female down our throats.
Originally posted by Darth Thor👆
Does make me wonder as well. Given I can easily pull out multiple lines of dialogue from that film about Men being the problem.My guess is because she didnt take over from a previous hero who was male. But I also do think the anti-woke movement is going overboard now.
Like why not just criticise whats wrong with a film instead of putting the blame on a generic woke agenda?
Originally posted by Trocity
👆 Yeah money better spent elsewhere imo. Check it out when it's out of theatres.I was worried that that game was going to be a rail shooter, is it going to be just a straight up FPS?
It’s gonna be a FPS, there’s a gameplay demo out on YouTube. It looks pretty good, not AAA quality, but not terrible imo.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
What doesnt make sense?
Well if John is dead as a kid, how are there the events of T1 and T2? How can there be time travel to begin if Skynet didn’t invent it as a last ditch effort to win? How is Sarah the way she is despite no events of the previous movies?
I mean the only way this makes any kind of sense is the past is always the same and then branches out like a fork in the road to different timelines. But I guess we won’t get any official explanation and just gotta roll with it.
Originally posted by Psychotron
According to RT Black Panther is the greatest movie ever made. Anyone who seriously trusts that site should stick to watching cartoons.
The Orville is bad, Discovery is good.
According to RT.
It was pretty funny when some of the critics who panned it came out and said "I changed my mind, this show is awesome."
Looking down your nose at a show, and eventually being drawn in, speaks both of the quality of the show (Because Orville was this good from day one), and the inherent bias coloring their first impressions.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
Well if John is dead as a kid, how are there the events of T1 and T2? How can there be time travel to begin if Skynet didn’t invent it as a last ditch effort to win? How is Sarah the way she is despite no events of the previous movies?I mean the only way this makes any kind of sense is the past is always the same and then branches out like a fork in the road to different timelines. But I guess we won’t get any official explanation and just gotta roll with it.
SPOILERS
They explain it pretty clearly in the film. That the Terminator that kills him is from a future that never happened. So you are correct that the past remains the same.
I mean frankly you come up with the same issue at the end of T2, when Judgement Day never happens, so Kyle is never sent back, so John is never born.... And yet hes still there.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Seems like the whole thing is just a rehash, nothing they did made the series better or more interesting.
It's not a random rehash - it's a deliberate reboot.
The feminists wanted to re-write the Terminator saga by knocking off the future of the Patriarchy (John Connor) brutally.
And they wanted to knock off Arnold (making him into a cuck, first).
And they wanted to replace the Arnold T-800 with Graces and have the Mexican girl as their new John Connor in what was supposed to be a trilogy of movies.
It's a reboot, disguised as a sequel.
Originally posted by Zenwolf
They actually made the series not make any sense given what they did to Connor.
The feminists don't care - they don't care that their changes to the Saga make literally zero sense.
They just wanted to knock off the male characters and replace them with female ones for their Terminator reboot trilogy.