Do Trumpers suffer from mental illnesses?

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
I did answer the question. It's a lot more powerful than a handgun, which are used in a large majority of shootings. I didn't mean a guaranteed victory every time but it would tip things in your favor.

So now you're saying that you didn't actually mean guarantee victory when you said "guarantee victory". you just meant advantage.

Ok, how does an AR-15 tips things in their favor?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So now you're saying that you didn't actually mean guarantee victory when you said "guarantee victory". you just meant advantage.

Ok, how does an AR-15 tips things in their favor?

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
You inability to detect hyperbole is worrying. Obviously there is never a guaranteed victory. I've said it over and over, I'm sick of repeating myself.

You haven't answered my follow-up question. how does an AR-15 tip things in someone's favor?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You haven't answered my follow-up question. how does an AR-15 tip things in someone's favor?

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
You inability to detect hyperbole is worrying. Obviously there is never a guaranteed victory. I've said it over and over, I'm sick of repeating myself.

An AR-15 is simply better than a handgun. How can You not understand this.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
An AR-15 is simply better than a handgun. How can You not understand this.

How is it better than a handgun in an active shooter scenario?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How is it better than a handgun in an active shooter scenario?

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
The scenario is going to be different for every school shooting. Why not have both an AR-15 and a handgun? It worked fine for the man who had theives in his house...

So you can't actually come up with a reason that using an AR-15 would be better than a handgun?

why would a far more powerful firearm be more effective? oh why cant you be a funny variety of clown.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you can't actually come up with a reason that using an AR-15 would be better than a handgun?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
why would a far more powerful firearm be more effective? oh why cant you be a funny variety of clown.

Both a .380 and 9mm are powerful enough to kill with a single shot, what advantage does an AR-15 being more powerful provide?

Intimidation. It's not like a bloke with a gun will shit himself if he sees a glock but he will if he sees an AR-15...

Originally posted by Silent Master
Both a .380 and 9mm are powerful enough to kill with a single shot, what advantage does an AR-15 being more powerful provide?

a .22 can kill as well. so can a pellet gun. every argument you make is dogshit.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Why are you defending a trigger-happy retard who fired on someone that she had no reason to believe meant her any harm? Is an assumption that he might be dangerous because some of the protesters have been justification for shooting him? Even assuming he did have brass knuckles, is shooting him when he made no attempt at striking her husband (which is almost certainly the case, considering that he did not in fact have brass knuckles, but in fact a finger-strengthener, unless you're asserting he might have gone after him with that) justifiable?

I'm not defending her, I'm wondering about the specific circumstances of what went down. If there was some kind of confrontation going on and one person suddenly reaches into their pocket and pulls something out and the other person fires because they don't know what the item is...I think that is different than knowing they posed no threat and shooting anyways.

Also, here's what the item in question likely looked like:

It doesn't really look much like brass knuckles IMO. And even if she did genuinely believe he posed a threat to her husband, this would merely make her a mouth-breathing retard who has no business owning a concealed weapon.

There is no image showing up for me. Also how is it retarded if she legitimately thought he was in danger, given the violence at past Trump rallies?

^ Paid Soros protestors at Trump rallies

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Higher capacity. Longer range (which again depends on circumstances) Easier to shoot. More accurate

It's nice that you finally decided to try and answer.

1) Higher capacity. This isn't true as they make extended and drum magazines for handguns as well.
2) Longer range. not really applicable to a school shooting scenario.
3) Easier to shoot. not true. Handguns are easier to shoot.
4) More accurate. The difference in accuracy only starts to be noticeable at distances that aren't likely to be encountered in a school shooting.

Handguns are also much faster to draw and shoot.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
a .22 can kill as well. so can a pellet gun. every argument you make is dogshit.

So since you can't refute my argument you're just going to start throwing insults, Nice.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So since you can't refute my argument you're just going to start throwing insults, Nice.

trump guy forgot to mention the difference in stopping power.

oh and #3 of your dogshit assertions made me lol. "because i said so"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i insulted your arguments there, tender guy.

I didn't say you insulted me personally, just that you started throwing insults. which you just admitted.

So, thank you.

whatever i can do to take the focus off your failed argument. yes a handgun is effective, but a rifle is far more damaging.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's nice that you finally decided to try and answer.

1) Higher capacity. This isn't true as they make extended and drum magazines for handguns as well.
2) Longer range. not really applicable to a school shooting scenario.
3) Easier to shoot. not true. Handguns are easier to shoot.
4) More accurate. The difference in accuracy only starts to be noticeable at distances that aren't likely to be encountered in a school shooting.

Handguns are also much faster to draw and shoot.

1) So you want modified hand guns? Could just buy an AR-15 and save the time 😉
2) The shooter wouldn't be 20 cm away you fool but I'm not talking about sniping him from 1000ft away either 😆
3) We aren't women. AR-15's are easier to shoot
4) Addressed in number 2

The quicker to draw argument is stupid. Handguns might be quicker to draw by 0.5 of a second but at least you won't miss with an AR-15. They aren't quicker to shoot.