Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Where did Mythlord go?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You could just answer the question, why are the women's records so much lower then the men's?

Examples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting#Women

He was physically overpowered by a woman the same size and level of fitness as him.

LMFAO:

Abortion advocate cries, begs, pleads when college cop arrests her for stealing pro-life sign — and it's a major hoot

"Why'd you rip it out of his hands?" the officer inquired.

"Because," she replied, tapping the sign, "this restricts women's rights."

After being forced to give back the activist's sign, the student tried to leave the scene, saying "I can't believe y'all protect them."

But the officer cut in front of her and prevented her from leaving: "Nope. You're not going anywhere. Right now you're being detained, okay?"

"Detained for what?" she answered, incredulous.

"Uh… larceny," the officer told her. "You stole his sign."

"He has it back!" she protested, later adding "I moved it 50 yards!"

"I don't care if you moved it one foot," he answered. "You don't have a right to take someone's property, okay? Period."

"Look, sir, I'm not trying to get arrested," the student pleaded with the officer.

He asked her if she has ID, and she says no.

"Am I being arrested right now?" she asked, adding that "I won't mess with the sign again."

The officer asked for ID again, and this time she coughed it up.

"I cannot believe these are the people you protect ... do you see us being subjected to this s**t?" she asked the officer.

He gently explained that she doesn't have to watch pro-life demonstrations.

"They're here because they want us to watch them," she explained, her voice beginning to crack.

The cop said she could ignore them and take away their power.

"It doesn't matter how much you ignore 'em; they're gonna come back," she replied. "This is why women have such a problem getting abortions in North Carolina, and y'all just let them get away with this s**t."

"Put your arms and hands behind your back," the officer finally told her. "You're under arrest for larceny."

YouTube video

Top comment on the video:

Officer to student: "You're not under arrest, I'm just moving you."

giggle

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where did Mythlord go?

Originally posted by Surtur
He was physically overpowered by a woman the same size and level of fitness as him.

I'm also not sure where you guys are getting the idea that I think men and women aren't biologically different. They are, and I'm pretty sure I've noted that on here in the past.

I just don't think being male or female is the biggest factor in any field of expertise.

Originally posted by MythLord
I do enjoy getting dominated. I am quite kinky 🙂

If only you were an attractive lady. 🙁

Well, I'm attractive.

I ain't no lady tho, sorry.

Originally posted by MythLord
You're asking the same question I've already answered a few pages back and I ain't in the mood to run in circles.

I do enjoy getting dominated. I am quite kinky 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why are all these women you say can match or exceed the men's records not competing?

Originally posted by MythLord
They are, just not against men.

If women capable of matching or exceeding the men's records are competing, then why are all the men's records higher?

I've answered this before, friend:

Originally posted by MythLord
More competition means higher records are set. More competition also means more people who wanna break said record which is set.

Essentially, men's records are higher primarily because there's a lot more competition and thus a bigger drive and a bigger goal to surpass. Men would have an easier time getting ready for a powerlifting event than women, obviously, but that doesn't mean a woman with adequate training and experience can't outdo a man, which is pretty much what I'm saying. Just having testicles isn't the end-all.

Now women mostly don't participate in sports of any form, and that is an entirely different topic to begin with, which also has a sh!t-ton of factors to examine.

So we are back to there being women that can match or exced the records set by men, they have just chosen not to compete?

I remember reading though that the difference in men and women's records in sports is not correlated with female participation rates.

Originally posted by MythLord
Well, I'm attractive.

I ain't no lady tho, sorry.

Anyone can be a lady in the dark.🤫

Originally posted by MythLord
I've answered this before, friend:

Essentially, men's records are higher primarily because there's a lot more competition and thus a bigger drive and a bigger goal to surpass. Men would have an easier time getting ready for a powerlifting event than women, obviously, but that doesn't mean a woman with adequate training and experience can't outdo a man, which is pretty much what I'm saying. Just having testicles isn't the end-all.

Now women mostly don't participate in sports of any form, and that is an entirely different topic to begin with, which also has a sh!t-ton of factors to examine.

Not true at all. It’s been proven multiple times, you take a man that’s adequate, and woman that’s excellent, the woman loses at least 8/10.

A group of high school boys soccer team annihilate a pro female soccer team.

The Williams sister got destroyed by a player that ranked in the 200th.

The last time a female tennis player beat a male player, the man was retired for years and old. Where as the female player was still at her prime, yet she barely beat him.

Take the worst boxer, and have him fight the best female boxer, 9/10 she’s gonna kill.

Originally posted by MythLord
I've answered this before, friend:

Essentially, men's records are higher primarily because there's a lot more competition and thus a bigger drive and a bigger goal to surpass. Men would have an easier time getting ready for a powerlifting event than women, obviously, but that doesn't mean a woman with adequate training and experience can't outdo a man, which is pretty much what I'm saying. Just having testicles isn't the end-all.

Now women mostly don't participate in sports of any form, and that is an entirely different topic to begin with, which also has a sh!t-ton of factors to examine.

Well, it's biology, though. Has nothing to do with anything else except genes and biology.

Androgen receptors and the greater number of them in men is fairly central to the difference. The other part is the test. Then, of course, their bodies responding to these things.

Duke (yes, the school) did a write-up about this recently:

https://law.duke.edu/sports/sex-sport/comparative-athletic-performance/

It's pretty simple: genetics. It's not any of the other factors that anyone tells you. There are no secrets. There are no special considerations. It is just a simple scenario of genetics. We shouldn't be surprised because we are sexually dymorphic. Trying to normalize the sexes to make as equal is just unscientific. It's not okay. We should accept the differences and accept the similarities. It's okay to acknowledge that we are very different. There's only shame in denying science and facts.

This isn't directed at mythlord, but I'm gonna say nobody can cry about climate change and science deniers and then try to deny biology and that there aren't infinite genders, etc.

Originally posted by Surtur
This isn't directed at mythlord, but I'm gonna say nobody can cry about climate change and science deniers and then try to deny biology and that there aren't infinite genders, etc.

Oh. Makes sense. Yeah, anti-science stuff, in general, is not okay.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, it's biology, though. Has nothing to do with anything else except genes and biology.

Androgen receptors and the greater number of them in men is fairly central to the difference. The other part is the test. Then, of course, their bodies responding to these things.

Duke (yes, the school) did a write-up about this recently:

https://law.duke.edu/sports/sex-sport/comparative-athletic-performance/

It's pretty simple: genetics. It's not any of the other factors that anyone tells you. There are no secrets. There are no special considerations. It is just a simple scenario of genetics. We shouldn't be surprised because we are sexually dymorphic. Trying to normalize the sexes to make as equal is just unscientific. It's not okay. We should accept the differences and accept the similarities. It's okay to acknowledge that we are very different. There's only shame in denying science and facts.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
TBH, if a woman were 700 in the world at any significant sport she would be a genetic freak.

Correct.

The woman who was utterly trouncing other women in track events was discovered to have "hidden testes" which were undescended. Her test levels were extremely high (but still below a normal man's because she was still hypogonadal for a "male"😉.

So she had 2 pairs of gonads. Gave her a huge advantage. Her fellow athletes kept complaining about her looking too much like a man and performing like a man. She had to get tested. Low and behold, she had a secret stash of gonads pumping her full of test. And she knew it. And her PCP knew it. And they kept it hidden on purpose.

It was not a genetic freak...more like a mutation that gave her an advantage.

A mutation is a polite way to describe a genetic freak to be honest. A swimmer girl from the 50's won everything, she had nonidea she was a very similar person she just knew she couldn't have kids. That said all top athletes are genetically quirky, most of us could train all our lives with every advantage and we would never be truly elite. I realised this playing Rugby, I was great at school and good at University, but a very average division 2 first team player as an adult.

Said it before, still think not allowing that woman with the hidden testicles to compete and/or take away her records is the wrong move, not her fault she was born with an advantage.