Originally posted by MythLord
We're really gonna be goin' in circles again, aren't we?
You could just answer the question, why are the women's records so much lower then the men's?
Examples.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting#Women
Serena Williams, who is perhaps the best women's tennis player of all-time, once bragged back in the late 90's that she could beat any man ranked outside of the top 200. Well, she soon after that had a chance to prove it by playing a man ranked #203 at the time.
The result: He creamed her. She only won a single point throughout the entire match. He later said that his only "training" for the match was leisurely playing a round of golf and having a few beers lol. He obviously didn't take it seriously at all and yet he still managed to effortlessly embarass her.
Serena even admitted rather recently on a talk show that men's tennis is a completely different game than women's tennis because men have such a huge natural advantage. Here it is for anyone who is interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cRIb63X_e0
It is only about 15-20 seconds.
John McEnroe is on record saying that, although he thinks Serena is an extremely good tennis player, if she were competing on the men's circuit she would only be ranked around 700 lol.
Why is this even a debate?
In most athletic sports the boys under 18 world records are better than the elite women's. In a typical year the women's world records are beaten over 10,000 times by men and boys. There's been women's elite soccer teams beaten by under 16s boys teams. There's been elite female fighters beaten by amateur men.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Why is this even a debate?In most athletic sports the boys under 18 world records are better than the elite women's. In a typical year the women's world records are beaten over 10,000 times by men and boys. There's been women's elite soccer teams beaten by under 16s boys teams. There's been elite female fighters beaten by amateur men.
Why is it a debate? Because of the retarded opinions of deluded sjw's obviously.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LOL@ anyone who thinks men and women should compete against each other in the same sports. It'd be funny as Hell to see some arrogant "GI Joe" b*tch who thinks she's just as strong as a man to get put on her ass time and time again in a sport like boxing or football."Men are only better at sports because they play them more! They have no actual real advantages over women! Men and women are exactly the same!" lmao
Seriously, only leftist sjw snowflakes could possibly think something so damn dumb.
Never underestimate the power of sports betting to skew results.
Remember the "battle of the sexes". About as legitimate as professional wrestling.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Why is this even a debate?In most athletic sports the boys under 18 world records are better than the elite women's. In a typical year the women's world records are beaten over 10,000 times by men and boys. There's been women's elite soccer teams beaten by under 16s boys teams. There's been elite female fighters beaten by amateur men.
It's a debate because leftists love science only to a certain extent.
Leftists Hypocrisy... Now Backed up by a University STUDY!
Lol...
Imagine being so dumb you fell for the whole "the okay symbol is a symbol of white supremacy!" hoax? Good thing nobody on this forum fell for it and continues to push the narrative though 🙂
Giggle:
Originally posted by Bentley
I can't believe people are arguing that women can match men in most sports. Why do you have to get into falsehoods like these to defend a principle? How much proof do you need to ignore before you get out of your denial? 😕
It gets even funnier when you realize this is the group that claims they love science.