Violence at Neo Nazi protest.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's nice, dear. But how so?

so the same way that you can be an islamist (someone who believes we would be best served under a caliphate dicated by sharia law) without being a terrorist, you can be a white nationalist without being a terrorist. what you are doing is trying to strong-arm an ideological opponent by stripping them of the basic civil liberties that we expect in this country. that's a dangerous precedent to set.

Originally posted by Surtur
No, Trump won because of delusional liberals who believe utterly stupid shit and who spew it to the masses. If Trump wins in 2020 I do not want to see a single liberal tear.

Get a hold of yourselves, push the stupid bullshit to the back burner. Do you not claim to be the superior party? Act like it or shut up about it.

^
Surtur deflecting and blaming everyone/thing else like his hero Trump taught him 😂

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
He doesn't just embolden them, he almost empowers them. A majority showed up wearing white polos and khakis trying to emulate Trump, I shit you not, including the driver. They had an organized dress code to make them come off as more normal looking. Trump has even removed alt-right extremists from terrorist watch lists in February.

Oh please stop. Sure a bunch of extreme leftist people went too far with affirmative action but there was a hardly an all white people are evil theme going on. Were white people under more of a microscope? Sure, but TBH they need to be. There are some deeply troubling cultures ingrained into many institutions and it will take a few decades to shift them out. Racism was just a great deal more concealed. And yes, some of it wasn't handled well with unfair or affirmative hiring practices etc. but how in the holy **** does that justify joining a Nazi march. There's a shit load of middle ground between being frustrated as being labeled a racist for being a white male and joining a Nazi group.

Did Obama empower those black kids to kidnap and torture that autistic white kid and broadcast it live on facebook? Did he empower antifa to shut down conservative gatherings on campus by starting riots? Because they all certainly seemed to feel empowered when that kind of stuff went on. Point is there are always going to be assholes who do shitty things without any kind of encouragement if even a small about of leash is given. And for all his faults, Trump doesn't actually encourage this kind of thing anymore than the other side does. The whole "it's ok to punch a Nazi" thing was going on for a while before this little gathering.

I'm not talking about BS affirmative hiring practices, I'm talking about the deliberate targeting of white people with violence. Not to mention the whole idea that white people aren't allowed to have an opinion about anything black people do.

Originally posted by Robtard
Can you imagine if Bush had condemned both Al Qaida and Amerca's actions/policies in the ME after a terror attack. Even his base would have eaten him alive. Trump's like Teflon to his most devote followers.

Lol dude, you didn't just post this did you? It sounds like you are bringing up 9/11. Which was not a violent fight in the streets between two pieces of shit.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
believing in white nationalism is not based on terror in the sense of terrorism, it's just based on a sense of racial identity which they characterize as worthy of defending. white nationaist groups do commit terror. prosecuting terror is one thing, trying to suppress an ideology is another.

so the same way that you can be an islamist (someone who believes we would be best served under a caliphate dicated by sharia law) without being a terrorist, you can be a white nationalist without being a terrorist. what you are doing is trying to strong-arm an ideological opponent by stripping them of the basic civil liberties that we expect in this country. that's a dangerous precedent to set.

Oh my, I said "white supremacy" and they're a fear/terror based ideology. So it seems you're attacking me on something I didn't say 🙁

edit: But "white nationalist" is kinda the new PC term white supremacist use to make themselves seem more normal/approachable. See: Richard B Spencer and the Alt-Right. They're really just relabeled Nazis.

Originally posted by Robtard
Meet Richard Spencer, the man credited with the creation of the "Alt-Right" movement and "yuge" Trump supporter.

YouTube video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o6-bi3jlxk

"America was until this past generation a white country, designed for ourselves and our posterity. It is our creation, it is our inheritance and it belongs to us."

Originally posted by Robtard
^
Surtur deflecting and blaming everyone/thing else like his hero Trump taught him 😂

I am blaming both sides. I do not see the issue. Did you truly feel because the violent little shits didn't kill anyone it would be ignored? Nope lol.

Did you ever answer me? Can Antifa shitheads be American patriots?

Anyone else noticed that the usual plethora of high profile "alt-right" blowhards have been conspicuous by their absence and the few that have stuck their heads above the parapet have engaged in the same desperate whataboutary that many in this thread have. Lauren Southern tried to peddle the "rumours the attacker was an antifa supporter" before finding it wasn't then said nothing. Sargon said that the left should address what they're doing that created the right wing reaction. Gavin Mciness said the same then said he wanted nothing to do with it. Well you do have something to do with it, Gavin. You don't get to stoke a fire and then absolve yourself of blame when it burns the fvcking place down. One glance in the comments sections of any of these so-called journalists youtube videos and you can see how they are idolised by the same swastika carrying spastics that were in attendance at that march.

edit

Originally posted by jaden101
Anyone else noticed that the usual plethora of high profile "alt-right" blowhards have been conspicuous by their absence and the few that have stuck their heads above the parapet have engaged in the same desperate whataboutary that many in this thread have. Lauren Southern tried to peddle the "rumours the attacker was an antifa supporter" before finding it wasn't then said nothing. Sargon said that the left should address what they're doing that created the right wing reaction. Gavin Mciness said the same then said he wanted nothing to do with it. Well you do have something to do with it, Gavin. You don't get to stoke a fire and then absolve yourself of blame when it burns the fvcking place down. One glance in the comments sections of any of these so-called journalists youtube videos and you can see how they are idolised by the same swastika carrying spastics that were in attendance at that march.

So we don't acknowledge the violent pieces of shit on the left? Or what?

Originally posted by darthgoober
edit

Goober you have to remember it's different. He's a Democrat. Rules are different.

EDIT: okay well before you had quoted a post but now you removed it, but yeah, remember that when a liberal does it there is a plethora of excuses waiting to make it seem alright.

Originally posted by Surtur
Dude, some are specifically going "name it!" The huff post had an article like that.

BOTH sides were pieces of shit. Did I just state something false? Cuz one side engaging in violence didn't kill anyone suddenly they get a pass? Nope. Again: this is exactly why he called out both sides. He knew people would twist this like that.

Ironic, Huff post did that to expose the hypocrisy of one group complaining about the actions of another, while simultaneously doing the same thing. A favorite pastime of yours.

He knew people would twist this like what? That Nazis are bad? Why would Trump have a problem with people concentrating specifically on nazis after one of them killed someone?

Originally posted by jaden101
Anyone else noticed that the usual plethora of high profile "alt-right" blowhards have been conspicuous by their absence and the few that have stuck their heads above the parapet have engaged in the same desperate whataboutary that many in this thread have. Lauren Southern tried to peddle the "rumours the attacker was an antifa supporter" before finding it wasn't then said nothing. Sargon said that the left should address what they're doing that created the right wing reaction. Gavin Mciness said the same then said he wanted nothing to do with it. Well you do have something to do with it, Gavin. You don't get to stoke a fire and then absolve yourself of blame when it burns the fvcking place down. One glance in the comments sections of any of these so-called journalists youtube videos and you can see how they are idolised by the same swastika carrying spastics that were in attendance at that march.

I have and it's because they're a bunch of nut-less cowards (like several in this thread). Lauren Southern both literally and figuratively. Stir the shit and then hide when it goes down.

Originally posted by Surtur
Goober you have to remember it's different. He's a Democrat. Rules are different.

EDIT: okay well before you had quoted a post but now you removed it, but yeah, remember that when a liberal does it there is a plethora of excuses waiting to make it seem alright.

^
#Triggered by the word "edit"

Originally posted by BackFire
Ironic, Huff post did that to expose the hypocrisy of one group complaining about the actions of another, while simultaneously doing the same thing. A favorite pastime of yours.

He knew people would twist this like what? That Nazis are bad? Why would Trump have a problem with people concentrating specifically on nazis after one of them killed someone?

Cuz it absolves the dipshits on the left that committed violence. Seriously, why shouldn't the pieces of shit be condemned too? Violence is okay unless you murder someone, is that the lesson? We can roll with that then.

Originally posted by Surtur
Goober you have to remember it's different. He's a Democrat. Rules are different.

EDIT: okay well before you had quoted a post but now you removed it, but yeah, remember that when a liberal does it there is a plethora of excuses waiting to make it seem alright.

Originally posted by Surtur
So we don't acknowledge the violent pieces of shit on the left? Or what?

See....whataboutary.

Unsurprising.

Originally posted by Surtur
Cuz it absolves the dipshits on the left that committed violence. Seriously, why shouldn't the pieces of shit be condemned too? Violence is okay unless you murder someone, is that the lesson? We can roll with that then.

It absolves them of nothing, and arrests have been made and should be made over yesterday's scuffles. But concentrating on murder over some mutual fist fights seems perfectly reasonable.

Originally posted by BackFire
It absolves them of nothing, and arrests have been made and should be made over yesterday's scuffles. But concentrating on murder over some mutual fist fights seems perfectly reasonable.

Both sides committed violence. One side is not being concentrated on, both sides were condemned, but liberals whined and whined.

Originally posted by jaden101
See....whataboutary.

Unsurprising.

Lol, seriously? We just forget about the violence of the other side? Nope.

Yeah. There were fights. Shitheads on both sides to a few slaps.

That being said. One side turned up with placards with "love" written on them. The other side turned up with swastika flags, paramilitary tactical gear, riot shields, clubs and military helmets.