Orion Vs Thor (Current)

Started by Zack M7 pages

Beyonders are all over the place, though. Isn't that what the writer said? Sometimes they kill abstracts, sometimes they don't.

Meh.. It was an outlier. He's not going to do that 9 out of 10 times. Let's be serious.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Meh.. It was an outlier. He's not going to do that 9 out of 10 times. Let's be serious.

Do you see Orion and Thor as peers? I'd give Orion a split against classic Thor, myself.

I have Orion winning. For all of Odinson's feats w/o Mjolnir, Mjolnir as a whole is a better addition to his powerset than Jarnbjorn...

Originally posted by Zack M
Beyonders are all over the place, though. Isn't that what the writer said? Sometimes they kill abstracts, sometimes they don't.

Please provide examples of them not having abstract power level.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Meh.. It was an outlier. He's not going to do that 9 out of 10 times. Let's be serious.

Let me handle this.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
I have Orion winning. For all of Odinson's feats w/o Mjolnir, Mjolnir as a whole is a better addition to his powerset than Jarnbjorn...

Even with Mjolnir, Orion can compete.

Originally posted by krisblaze
Average is a ridiculous way of measuring things like these.

Galactus suddenly being dropped by Squirrel Girl doesn't drop his capabilities to an average of galaxy busting and street level.

Jarnbjorn can cut Celestials, Thor and Gorr.

Power Man is an absurd outlier.

True.

Originally posted by carver9
Let me handle this.

😂 you tell en

Originally posted by carver9
Thor probably wasn't chopping Apocalypse with everything. Seems like he wanted him to suffer. The cut that he did during their first encounter almost split Apocalypse in half. The ax treats Celestials like fodder, it cutting through Beyonders tells us how powerful it is. What low showings besides that PM showing is low for the ax?

Remember heroes became villains in that story. He was trying to kill him and "pry free the soft meat covering within (the armour)"

He was legit trying to kill him even said so.

Originally posted by -K-M-
Remember heroes became villains in that story. He was trying to kill him and "pry free the soft meat covering within (the armour)"

He was legit trying to kill him even said so.

They did become villains but they didn't kill a single person during their rampage against Apocalypse and the crew. Also, we've seen him chop Apocalypse almost in half with the axe already. Are we not counting that?

Originally posted by carver9
They did become villains but they didn't kill a single person during their rampage against Apocalypse and the crew. Also, we've seen him chop Apocalypse almost in half with the axe already. Are we not counting that?

No but they tried. Silly arguement seeing as villains don't go around killing everyone as the heroes stop them. Just this story the heroes and villains were reversed

We're counting that. In fact strengthens the inconsistency of th axe

Originally posted by Zack M
Even with Mjolnir, Orion can compete.

Yep.

Completely forgot Thor also took the axe to the chest and was fine. Apoc nearly getting split in half also had context. He let his guard down as up until that point the axe didn't do any damage to him and didn't know of the upgrade. He even comments on that before the axe split scene.

Originally posted by -K-M-
Silly argument
.....
Originally posted by carver9
..........
Originally posted by carver9

Originally posted by -K-M-
No but they tried. Silly arguement seeing as villains don't go around killing everyone as the heroes stop them. Just this story the heroes and villains were reversed

We're counting that. In fact strengthens the inconsistency of th axe

The thing here is, Thor WAS chopping through his armor with no problem. He just didn't continue pressing on with the axe for obvious reasons, plot. It's not like he was failing, he just didn't attempt to chop the character in half. It's like asking why didn't Zod kill the members of the suicide squad when he was facing them. The strength is there to achieve killing results, hell, he could've shot a dose of heat vision at any of them and killed them but it didn't happen. Not because he didn't have the strength, he didn't kill them because he didn't need to. This is across the board with all of the villains. Batman fought Wraith, someone that was stronger than Superman and had all of his limbs afterward. I shouldn't have to explain this to you since we know you know comics.

Originally posted by carver9
The thing here is, Thor WAS chopping through his armor with no problem. He just didn't continue pressing on with the axe for obvious reasons, plot. It's not like he was failing, he just didn't attempt to chop the character in half. It's like asking why didn't Zod kill the members of the suicide squad when he was facing them. The strength is there to achieve killing results, hell, he could've shot a dose of heat vision at any of them and killed them but it didn't happen. Not because he didn't have the strength, he didn't kill them because he didn't need to. This is across the board with all of the villains. Batman fought Wraith, someone that was stronger than Superman and had all of his limbs afterward. I shouldn't have to explain this to you since we know you know comics.

Again seeing its high end feats apoc should have literally been killed with a one shot. Same for Thor taking the axe right to the chest in the same fight he split apoc. Didn't even phase him. Axe is inconsistent. You are choosing just go by it's high showings and nothing else. Again recently in generations unworthy Thor & mighty thor, Thor literally used the axe to slice Apoc across the chest...but didn't even damage him...even referenced the early time he sliced him open...yet did nothing here.

He didn't try to chop the character in half? Both times he wanted to kill apoc. That's why he augmented the axe in the first place and directly says he wanted to kill him

The rest of your post is filler to fool people you have an arguement and completly irrelevant

Remember,KM:

Originally posted by carver9
I already know the answer. I focus on combat showings but I'm trying to see if others are on the same page.

My last part of my reply was to hostile and tried to edit it out but kept getting errors. So apologize for that.

In their recent fight, Apoc was at least a hundredfold mass wise. So y'all are discrediting Jarnborn for one low showing even though every single other showing is a high one? Pis poor reasoning and logic