Mandalay Bay Shooting; 50+ dead-200+ injured

Yes. Fascist prefer it when the only ones that can fire Automatic Weapons into crowds is the Government.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]like mindless cattle. [/B]

Don't you think that's a bit insensitive? I'd imagine it'd be rather hard to keep your head in a situation like that.

Common sense is in very low demand these days.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Don't you think that's a bit insensitive? I'd imagine it'd be rather hard to keep your head in a situation like that.

he's just trying to shock-troll because his life is empty and meaningless.

That's rather sad.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Yes. Fascist prefer it when the only ones that can fire Automatic Weapons into crowds is the Government. [/B]

Both are working well for America. How many police and non police gun deaths are you up to this year now?

Sarah "I Sold My Morals" Huckabee Sanders said the White House's stance is that it's "premature" to talk about gun reform as we don't have all the facts. Oh well, going to have to wait until the next one.

So you don't really live in North Philly then I take it?

Sigh.

This again....

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That's the question isn't it.

Nope. It's not.

We're having this conversation all the time.

Fact is, most American's want sensible gun regulation, but no one wants an outright ban. So we get gun regulation, like the fully automatic ban.

A conversation on gun control is fine, imo. Just without the"AHA!" snark behind it everytime something happens (And I say it again, there are people with rpg's.. Laws aren't magic that stops people from getting shite, unfortunately..)

Perhaps people like Rob believe that these events should be used to emphasize the point that we need sensible gun legislation sooner rather then later. I.E. that it needs to occur more quickly due to events like these.

Originally posted by cdtm
Nope. It's not.

We're having this conversation all the time.

Fact is, most American's want sensible gun regulation, but no one wants an outright ban. So we get gun regulation, like the fully automatic ban.

A conversation on gun control is fine, imo. Just without the"AHA!" snark behind it everytime something happens (And I say it again, there are people with rpg's.. Laws aren't magic that stops people from getting shite, unfortunately..)

They can make supermarket trolleys that the wheels jam up within a certain distance of the store so they can't be taken too far. They can make anti-social behaviour ankle tags that can alert authorities when someone is outside their home during their curfew hours but they can't make guns that only fire within a certain distance of their registered home or at proper gun clubs and firing ranges

Weird that.

Originally posted by cdtm
Nope. It's not.

We're having this conversation all the time.

Fact is, most American's want sensible gun regulation, but no one wants an outright ban. So we get gun regulation, like the fully automatic ban.

A conversation on gun control is fine, imo. Just without the"AHA!" snark behind it everytime something happens (And I say it again, there are people with rpg's.. Laws aren't magic that stops people from getting shite, unfortunately..)

One side saying "gun reform!" and the saying "2nd Amendment!" and nothing much else happening really isn't.

Assault rifle ban was in 1994. The ban is iirc, currently expired and in legal limbo

Originally posted by jaden101
They can make supermarket trolleys that the wheels jam up within a certain distance of the store so they can't be taken too far. They can make anti-social behaviour ankle tags that can alert authorities when someone is outside their home during their curfew hours but they can't make guns that only fire within a certain distance of their registered home or at proper gun clubs and firing ranges

Weird that.

Originally posted by Kurk
And you really think people haven't figured out ways to get around both of those things?

Yeeaaahhh. Best not even bothering to try, eh?

Originally posted by jaden101
Yeeaaahhh. Best not even bothering to try, eh?

Might as well do away will all laws, cos you know, someone somewhere has figured a way round

Originally posted by Robtard
Might as well do away will all laws, cos you know, someone somewhere has figured a way round

Can't wait to unistall my anti-virus and firewall on my computer cos of the same logic.

Originally posted by jaden101
Can't wait to unistall my anti-virus and firewall on my computer cos of the same logic.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Where do you think he got it?

I have no idea. There are a few possibilities. He could have perhaps bought it when it was still legal, which I think was until 1985-1986. Most likely though he got it illegally, though I understand he had legal gun purchases as well.

I have also seen people in the media talking about silencers and stuff in regards to this weapon. People need to know that silencers are not like in the movies, they will not allow some stealth gunshot, it is mostly used for protection(a gun is loud and can damage your ears, a silencer will reduce it to a slightly more tolerable level).