Wolverine vs. MCU Lady Sif

Started by Josh_Alexander15 pages
Originally posted by FrothByte
I read the article, and nowhere in there does it say that tendons and ligaments are made of bone or are considered as "bone". In the other post you made, nowhere does it say that Wolverine's tendons and ligaments are coated with Adamantium. Please stop making stuff up.

=.=

Stop avoiding what its clearly stated.

Tendons, ligaments, and Cartilages are part of the Skeletal system.

Both comics and movies describe how Wolverine's skeleton is coated with Adamantium (which includes the tendons etc).

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
He is not even intelligent enough to realise that the strength of the adamantium bones (which we are all aware of, despite his ridiculous accusations) isn't the issue with his argument on the subject, yet tells other people they don't understand things. Nor does he seem to understand that actually catching the weight of the car after it had already been in freefall for some time is more impressive than just lifting it off the ground, considering it had been accelerating downwards for several seconds.

I even mentioned that very point earlier in the thread and he just ignored it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
=.=

Stop avoiding what its clearly stated.

Tendons, ligaments, and Cartilages are part of the Skeletal system.

Both comics and movies describe how Wolverine's skeleton is coated with Adamantium (which includes the tendons etc).

Except you never claimed they were part of the skeletal system. You claimed they were bones. They are not bones. Period. And nothing ever said about Wolverine stated that his tendons and ligaments are also coated in Adamantium, because anyone with any iota of common sense would know that to make your tendons and ligaments into unbreakable steel would mean that you won't be able to move anymore.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Except you never claimed they were part of the skeletal system. You claimed they were bones. They are not bones. Period. And nothing ever said about Wolverine stated that his tendons and ligaments are also coated in Adamantium, because anyone with any iota of common sense would know that to make your tendons and ligaments into unbreakable steel would mean that you won't be able to move anymore.

He doesn't seem to understand that the terms skeleton and skeletal system are not interchangeable, they mean different things.

With a quick guess, how many ninjas could Thor move? And btw, they weren't ninjas, they were Yakuza

At a guess, at least a hundred times more than Wolverine.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
With a quick guess, how many ninjas could Thor move? And btw, they weren't ninjas, they were Yakuza

To be fair, Wolverine never really pulled those yakuninjas. It's not like they were straining against him as he dragged them forward. They'd shoot him with arrows and just flow with it, putting pressure ever now and then. Kinda like fishing. They didn't really put the effort into stopping him till the very end. I doubt he could have pulled more than 10... and that's already being generous.

Assuming that the arrows can actually penetrate Thor (which they probably won't), he should easily be able to take off at a jog and those 20+ ninjas would be dragged all over the place.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Except you never claimed they were part of the skeletal system. You claimed they were bones. They are not bones. Period. And nothing ever said about Wolverine stated that his tendons and ligaments are also coated in Adamantium, because anyone with any iota of common sense would know that to make your tendons and ligaments into unbreakable steel would mean that you won't be able to move anymore.

My bad then.

No, the movie never said his bones were the only coated.

The movie said his Skeleton was coated which includes the tendons etc.

Unbreakable and not flexible arent the samething.

Did you read the link i sent you?

Originally posted by FrothByte
To be fair, Wolverine never really pulled those yakuninjas. It's not like they were straining against him as he dragged them forward. They'd shoot him with arrows and just flow with it, putting pressure ever now and then. Kinda like fishing. They didn't really put the effort into stopping him till the very end. I doubt he could have pulled more than 10... and that's already being generous.

Assuming that the arrows can actually penetrate Thor (which they probably won't), he should easily be able to take off at a jog and those 20+ ninjas would be dragged all over the place.

You are assuming that.

Even their leader was impressed that his ninjas couldnt hold them. He had to use a tranq arrow to stop him.

Your assumptions are invalid.

Originally posted by Silent Master
At a guess, at least a hundred times more than Wolverine.

Guessing isnt a valid argument.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
My bad then.

No, the movie never said his bones were the only coated.

The movie said his Skeleton was coated which includes the tendons etc.

Unbreakable and not flexible arent the samething.

Did you read the link i sent you?

The skeleton does not include tendons.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The skeleton does not include tendons.

Your opinion?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
My bad then.

No, the movie never said his bones were the only coated.

The movie said his Skeleton was coated which includes the tendons etc.

Unbreakable and not flexible arent the samething.

Did you read the link i sent you?

I read the link and again, it never said that tendons and ligaments are bone. In any case, they don't matter. Adamantium is rigid once cooled down. Unless you have proof that adamantium can be some kind of flexible metal then tendons and ligaments can't be adamantium.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Your opinion?

No, it's a fact. The words skeleton and skeletal system are not interchangeable they have different meanings.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, it's a fact. The words skeleton and skeletal system are not interchangeable they have different meanings.

No, when you mean Skeleton you refer to the skeletal system.

Else youd say bones.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I read the link and again, it never said that tendons and ligaments are bone. In any case, they don't matter. Adamantium is rigid once cooled down. Unless you have proof that adamantium can be some kind of flexible metal then tendons and ligaments can't be adamantium.

https://www.quora.com/Are-Logans-jo...d-in-adamantium

This link.

Read it and then come back.

Sometimes you dont read what i send. And then i argue why you dont understand what am saying.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No, when you mean Skeleton you refer to the skeletal system.

Else youd say bones.

You really need to learn what words mean. Again, skeleton and skeletal system are not interchangeable. they are not the same word, they do not mean the same thing.

All you are doing is proving at your ignorance.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You really need to learn what words mean. Again, skeleton and skeletal system are not interchangeable. they are not the same word, they do not mean the same thing.

All you are doing is proving at your ignorance.

Google - Skeleton: an internal or external framework of bone, cartilage, or other rigid material supporting or containing the body of an animal or plant.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skeleton

Man you need to update your dictionary.

The truly sad thing is, you are not aware that the definition you just provided proves you wrong and me right.

Like I said, all you're doing is proving your ignorance.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The truly sad thing is, you are not aware that the definition you just provided proves you wrong and me right.

Like I said, all you're doing is proving your ignorance.

Ignoring or Evading my above post wont help your case SilentMaster.

You even dare to insult me when the dictionary itself is supporting me. What type of English did you learn?

The truly sad, sad, sad, sad thing is you actually believe that definition supports your stance.

It is amazingly difficult to debate someone who doesn't know what words mean and is incapable of understanding definitions.