Originally posted by FrothByte
Anyway, I'm done here. Josh is either trolling or completely crazy. There's just too much ridiculousness in his posts. Either way, I'm not willing to waste effort on him anymore.
Did you like how he said Thor crushing Iron Man's armor wasn't a strength feat, instead it was proof that the armor was weak.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Anyway, I'm done here. Josh is either trolling or completely crazy. There's just too much ridiculousness in his posts. Either way, I'm not willing to waste effort on him anymore.
You are clearly MISINFORMED.
Am not willing to discuss neither.
You clearly didnt know what you were talking about when you first posted.
Sif COULD NEVER defeat Wolverine. Saying otherwise is trolling.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1.Its Adamantium!!Minute 1:20: If Thor gets cut by a knife then Sif gets Sliced into pieces!!
By the way, the Son of Odin was wearing an armor. What makes you even believe Sif has a chance against Adamantium claws?
Page 2. The post (made by Josh) that brought Loki into the discussion.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander ]???????Lol. You need force to make up momentum. You need a MASSIVE FORCE to built of enogh momentum to cross SEVERAL concrete walls like if it was nothing!
The fact that Thor bent IM's armor doesnt make him stronger! It just means the metal is weak.
IM can lift up TONS without issue.
Thor hasnt been depicted lifting such strengths.
Thor isnt stronger than IM.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I never said ot wasnt a strength feat! I said it didnt prove IM being stronger than Wolverine.The Metal bends which requires strength but doesnt prove your point of Thor being stronger than Wolverine.
Correction, it didn't prove to you that Thor was stronger because you arbitrarily decided the metal must be weak.
You decide what you want to be true first and then you interpret feats in such a way to backup your massively biased opinion.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Correction, it didn't prove to you that Thor was stronger because you arbitrarily decided the metal must be weak.You decide what you want to be true first and then you interpret feats in such a way to backup your massively biased opinion.
Biased or not at least its better based than yours.
You and Byte have given failed to prove that Sif wins and deviated from the topic of this thread the moment your points sank!
This isnt longer debatable. This doesnt belong to this thread therefore no more debating Thor or Lucky.
So dont worry to reply.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
[B]Reviewing the participants and replying to other's opinions Ive drawn up my conclusions.1. Wolverine's Superfast regeneration and Adamantium Bones makes him basically undestructible!! Unless Sif has an Adamantium bullet (Like Stryker) or a Superhot Adamantium sword (like Silver Samurai) there is no way Sif can kill him.
2. Wolverine's Adamantium claws can cut through almost any material. Chances are that Sif will get cut down.
3. The OP never stated this was a slugfest or a hand to hand combat therefore K.O. isnt valid. Furthermore, Wolverine enduring punches from the Juggernaut makes K.O. highly unprobable.
With all these said, my conclusion is:
[/B]
For anyone who enters this thread.
All previous comments from page 5 to the post before this fall OUTSIDE thread parameters and should be AVOIDED to prevent confusion.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Only, you're basing Wolverine winning on your own massively biased interpretation of his and Sif's feats. As such, your opinion on this matter is completely worthless.
Based on facts.
Ive made my point. You are only using personal comments to attack my points.
UNLESS you want to debate SERIOUSLY REFREAIN yourself from posting please.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your interpretation of the facts are massively biased so of course we have to comment on your interpretations.
As i said unless you want to debate seriously bringing evidence to the table instead of just attacks and personal comments refrain yourself from posting.
No biased opinions, just logical and evidenced opinions.
It pisses me off when you guys just attack without bringing actual evidence.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Seriously dude, you can't be this dumb. If you fell off a cliff and I grabbed your hand then started pulling you up, and in the other hand you were holding a 100 pound dumbell. Would you say you weren't lifting the dumbell just because I was pulling you up with your other hand?Thor is not a rope, he actually needs to grip the car and that takes a tremendous amount of strength.
The fact that he cannot seem to grasp this is staggering. Using his logic, Garfield Spiderman catching an SUV with one hand (during the bridge scene in ASM), while dangling from a piece of webbing, is all down to the webbing and has zero to do with Spiderman's limb strength. The hammer provided Thor with an achor/tether point, but without the required strength, he would have lost grip on either the car or the hammer while he was taking it back up to the bridge. I mean the guy doesn't seem to realise that even in his own faulty analogy, the rope used to pull the person up would still need to be strong enough to support their weight, or it would break.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
As i said unless you want to debate seriously bringing evidence to the table instead of just attacks and personal comments refrain yourself from posting.No biased opinions, just logical and evidenced opinions.
It pisses me off when you guys just attack without bringing actual evidence.
Only your evidence doesn't actually prove what you think it does, due to your massively biased interpretation of it