Wolverine vs. MCU Lady Sif

Started by Josh_Alexander15 pages

Originally posted by FrothByte
Seriously dude, you can't be this dumb. If you fell off a cliff and I grabbed your hand then started pulling you up, and in the other hand you were holding a 100 pound dumbell. Would you say you weren't lifting the dumbell just because I was pulling you up with your other hand?

Thor is not a rope, he actually needs to grip the car and that takes a tremendous amount of strength.

Lol stop the insults specally if the one who is wrong here is you.

No. You are lifting me and the dumbell. Am just holding the dumbell.

If you are drowning and i cast you a rope and begin to lift you. Who is lifring you? The rope or me?

A rope cant lift or apply force for obvious reasons. All the rope is doing is hold you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You compared Wolverine's strength level to that of Thor, therefore this is entirely relevant to the discussion.

Frothbyte brought Thor in here.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He probably thinks he could hold on to the Titanic as long as someone else was doing the pulling.

As long as i have undestructible bones and a good grip at tje boat i could.

Its clear you dont understand the difference between strength and endurance/durability.

To hold something you require endurance/durability.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Frothbyte brought Thor in here.

You then compared his strength level to that of Thor, making this discussion relevant to the thread.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
As long as i have undestructible bones and a good grip at tje boat i could.

Its clear you dont understand the difference between strength and endurance/durability.

To hold something you require endurance/durability.

The depth of your ignorance is staggering.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The depth of your ignorance is a staggering.

Yours more

Originally posted by Silent Master
You then compared his strength level to that of Thor, making this discussion relevant to the thread.

And it was an error.

It was also an error to discuss things that you guys clearly have no knowledge on.

Lets fix the mistakes. Thor is irrelevant to this discussion so no more Thor in here.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yours more

I'm not the one that is unable to understand basic concepts.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And it was an error.

It was also an error to discuss things that you guys clearly have no knowledge on.

Lets fix the mistakes. Thor is irrelevant to this discussion so no more Thor in here.

Until you admit that Wolverine's strength level is nowhere near Thor's, this discussion will remain relevant to the thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm not the one that is unable to understand basic concepts.

Yes you are

Originally posted by Silent Master
Until you admit that Wolverine's strength level is nowhere near Thor's, this discussion will remain relevant to the thread.

He might not be stronger than Thor.

But Wolverine's strength isnt insignificant like you guys picture it.

Thor without hia powerbelt, armor, and mjolnir is weaker than Wolverine.

The fact that you say that in the same post where you use non movie information just proves my point.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The fact that you say that in the same post where you use non movie information just proves my point.

When did i used non movie information?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
When did i used non movie information?

Where in the movie does it say Thor's strength is amped via his equipment?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where in the movie does it say Thor's strength is amped via his equipment?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_IfYZZDTays

Evidently you never watched the movies.

Thor's powers are enhanced by his equipment. Marvel has said so before.

Your ability to interpret what you see is remarkably shallow.

By that, I mean if the power actually resided in the equipment, Odin wouldn't have had to enchant Mjolnir with the ability to grant Thor's power to the worthy.

Thor doesn't have a powerbelt in the movies.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor doesn't have a powerbelt in the movies.

He sees Odin remove Thor's armor in the same scene he refers to stripping him of his powers and thus falsely assumes the power resides in Thor's equipment.

If the power actually resided in the equipment, Odin would not have needed to enchant the hammer to grant Thor's power to the worthy.

Edit: Nor would Thor be able to channel lightning now that Mjolnir is destroyed, which we can clearly see he is able to do.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
As long as i have undestructible bones and a good grip at tje boat i could.

Its clear you dont understand the difference between strength and endurance/durability.

To hold something you require endurance/durability.

Indestructible bones doesn't stop you from getting your arm ripped. When you pick something up and hold it in your hands, you're not using your bones to do that. When you grip something, that's also not your bones. In fact, grip strength is a known metric for measuring people's overall strength.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He sees Odin remove Thor's armor in the same scene he refers to stripping him of his powers and thus falsely assumes the power resides in Thor's equipment.

If the power actually resided in the equipment, Odin would not have needed to enchant the hammer to grant Thor's power to the worthy.

Edit: Nor would Thor be able to channel lightning now that Mjolnir is destroyed, which we can clearly see he is able to do.

Anyway, I'm done here. Josh is either trolling or completely crazy. There's just too much ridiculousness in his posts. Either way, I'm not willing to waste effort on him anymore.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your ability to interpret what you see is remarkably shallow.

By that, I mean if the power actually resided in the equipment, Odin wouldn't have had to enchant Mjolnir with the ability to grant Thor's power to the worthy.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor doesn't have a powerbelt in the movies.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He sees Odin remove Thor's armor in the same scene he refers to stripping him of his powers and thus falsely assumes the power resides in Thor's equipment.

If the power actually resided in the equipment, Odin would not have needed to enchant the hammer to grant Thor's power to the worthy.

Edit: Nor would Thor be able to channel lightning now that Mjolnir is destroyed, which we can clearly see he is able to do.

Thor's armor and hammer enhances his strength and gives him most of his power.

When Odin striped him from it Thor became a normal Asgardian.

Clearly seen in that scene.