abhilegend
Prince of All Saiyans
Originally posted by darthgoober
Gee I wonder why that would be... possibly because when we look at the scans we don't see Surfer actually draining her...https://comicvine.gamespot.com/images/1300-3750557
https://comicvine.gamespot.com/images/1300-3750558
https://comicvine.gamespot.com/images/1300-3750559
... I mean I certainly don't see any energy being transferred from her to Surfer.
We don't see it happening it several times before. Not to mention her powers closely resembled power cosmic and he could drain it as he has far better control.
It's entirely irrelevant to draining Superman. She is a entirely featless character.
Yes because he made it known he was willing to and the claim doesn't go against his nature as demonstrated when he's used energy manipulation to exploit vulnerabilities in his opponents before.
I'm specifically asking for radiation based weakness exploitation as you claimed. Don't change the goalposts.
Draining is not the same as detecting weakness as kryptonite or red sun radiation and actually doing it.
If I have a history that includes hitting someone with a bat for pissing me off and I threaten to throw a chair at someone if they piss me off it can totally be said the instance supports throwing a chair to be within my character even if someone steps in to prevent the other person from pissing me off any further.
Don't change the goalposts. You said Surfer has a history of detecting weakness like kryptonite and red sun radiation. Show that now or concede you're a liar.
I never said that he'd go for weakness exploitation from the get go.
How much time will it take? How many times has he done it on panel?
I'm specifically asking for radiation weakness exploitation if you are not understanding still. Not energy manipulation.
But he demonstrated his willingness to do so with the threat. The fact that he end up needing to is irrelevant.
It's entirely relevant as he never even tried it on someone with Gladiator's powers. Firestorm has used kryptonite on Superman and even SBP.
That's called weakness exploitation in character.
Surfer making a bluff isn't.
Because you're asking for proof that he DIDN'T(a negative) have Glad's weakness when there was absolutely nothing to suggest that he did. Thus, you're asking for proof of a negative.
Because you claim this was a proof of Gladiator's weakness exploitation when it wasn't shown anywhere before or after.
I'm asking you to prove your claim.
The time when Hulk screams that Surfer's killing him. I'm all but positive that Surfer's blasting him when he was screaming that.
In SS 125? He was draining Hulk and Hulk was already dying with no control over his energy.
Irrelevant.
Yes but your statements don't make sense.
In your alternate world maybe where Surfer can detect weaknesses.
You're claim is that Surfer had to be bluffing because Lunatik escaped but in the story where he escaped it was specifically talked about that Lunatik evolves past things. Thus his escape itself doesn't support your claim.
But it wasn't shown in the Drax story where he actually escaped.
But I like your insinuation that the only way surfer can win against Lobo is run away from the fight.