1-4) Why would I need more than what is visually evident? Undead Asgardians are not Live Asgardians. One has skin and has not been decomposing for centuries, the other has been. They are not the same. Thus they do not share “feats” and showings. Each are taken separate from the other. Me punching a 1000 year old decomposing mummy and smashing it with my fist does not make me strong enough to punch a living person’s head off. What is so hard to understand here?Your entire line of logic is a complete non sequitor. Them killing Live Asgardians using Asgardian weapons does not make them Live Asgardians.
5) Now you are just being silly. Vision’s purity of soul made him worthy thus he could lift the hammer. He didn’t overwhelm the enchantment, he passed the requirements needed to lift it. That is the entire crux of the story on why they decided to trust him and if you don’t know this, then you need to rewatch the movie again.
At what point was she shown to “not have much higher strength”. Where did she fail to lift anything or fail to overpower anyone (other than full power Surtur)? Post proof and not your opinions.
They are the elite soldiers with the buff of the Eternal flame, their strength and speed didn't get affected by the decomposition, why would their durability be affected? Do we see mummies were to fast and strong? No. Stop avoiding the question and GIVE proof.
Why couldn't the living Asgaridns own them? By your logic they are decomposed badly, they should have moved much slower and weaker because they lack of muscle.
5) Yeah same thing, Hela could have used some magic to dissolve the enhancement of the hammer. Since NONE of her later feats showed she really possess such strength.
She wasn't able to kill others without using blades, if she got huge power advantage her single punch could have easily cracked out their skull. Same with her speed.
You are keep avoiding all the proofs and just using the one feat which was very weak here. Bad try.