Hela vs. Wonder Woman

Started by Silent Master15 pages

Originally posted by h1a8
If you don't know any superhuman speed feats by WW then you shouldn't be participating in this thread.
That's like asking someone to prove Thor is superhumanly strong by asking them to post a clip.

The fact that the sword broke on him like that proves he is very powerful.

Show examples.

No it doesn't, all his other feats point to him not being very powerful.

Hela can create dozens of blades at a time, can even make them building sized and can create them remotely.

How is Diana wining this?

Does anyone else like h1's circular logic? I mean he is basically saying that Ares casually destroying WW's sword is proof that he's very powerful and that the sword was obviosuly very durable as it took someone as powerful as Ares to destroy it.

Hela would destroy that sword also, even the sword she used to cut doomsday

Originally posted by Nevan
Hela can create dozens of blades at a time, can even make them building sized and can create them remotely.

How is Diana wining this?

OMG this is still going on?

Wonder Woman got the bracelets and shield to defend herself, she also got the speed and strength advantage.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And how would she fair against a swarm of swords?

You are assuming a Valkyrie can't dodge bullets? A bold claim.

Hela stomps, WW has no way of surviving much less of defeating her.

Shield, Bracelets, speed and strength advantage, lasso to shackle Hela.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
Shield, Bracelets, speed and strength advantage, lasso to shackle Hela.

Only Hela is actually much stronger.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
Shield, Bracelets, speed and strength advantage, lasso to shackle Hela.

Vs. an endless stream of weapons coming from Hela, all of which completely capable of cutting through WW.


1-4) Why would I need more than what is visually evident? Undead Asgardians are not Live Asgardians. One has skin and has not been decomposing for centuries, the other has been. They are not the same. Thus they do not share “feats” and showings. Each are taken separate from the other. Me punching a 1000 year old decomposing mummy and smashing it with my fist does not make me strong enough to punch a living person’s head off. What is so hard to understand here?

Your entire line of logic is a complete non sequitor. Them killing Live Asgardians using Asgardian weapons does not make them Live Asgardians.

5) Now you are just being silly. Vision’s purity of soul made him worthy thus he could lift the hammer. He didn’t overwhelm the enchantment, he passed the requirements needed to lift it. That is the entire crux of the story on why they decided to trust him and if you don’t know this, then you need to rewatch the movie again.

At what point was she shown to “not have much higher strength”. Where did she fail to lift anything or fail to overpower anyone (other than full power Surtur)? Post proof and not your opinions.

They are the elite soldiers with the buff of the Eternal flame, their strength and speed didn't get affected by the decomposition, why would their durability be affected? Do we see mummies were to fast and strong? No. Stop avoiding the question and GIVE proof.

Why couldn't the living Asgaridns own them? By your logic they are decomposed badly, they should have moved much slower and weaker because they lack of muscle.

5) Yeah same thing, Hela could have used some magic to dissolve the enhancement of the hammer. Since NONE of her later feats showed she really possess such strength.

She wasn't able to kill others without using blades, if she got huge power advantage her single punch could have easily cracked out their skull. Same with her speed.

You are keep avoiding all the proofs and just using the one feat which was very weak here. Bad try.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Vs. an endless stream of weapons coming from Hela, all of which completely capable of cutting through WW.

What do you mean "endless" at all? You think with the disadvantage of
Strength
Weapon
Speed

Hela could just stand there and shoot weapon from herself rather than get punched again and again and again?

Originally posted by Slowpoke
What do you mean "endless" at all? You think with the disadvantage of
Strength
Weapon
Speed

Hela could just stand there and shoot weapon from herself rather than get punched again and again and again?

Only Hela is much stronger than WW.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
What do you mean "endless" at all? You think with the disadvantage of
Strength
Weapon
Speed

Hela could just stand there and shoot weapon from herself rather than get punched again and again and again?

Endless, meaning never ending. Hela was generating weapons from thin air and didn't seem to have a limit as to how many she can generate.

As for the rest of your statement, I have to be honest here, I don't actually understand what you're saying. I mean no offence when I say this, but you need to work on your english a bit more.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Endless, meaning never ending. Hela was generating weapons from thin air and didn't seem to have a limit as to how many she can generate.

As for the rest of your statement, I have to be honest here, I don't actually understand what you're saying. I mean no offence when I say this, but you need to work on your english a bit more.

Because they didn't give her pressure, with Wonder Woman keep punch her from everywhere she would be busy dodging and blocking while she could not do so.

Stop avoiding all the advantages using all kind of excuses. Wonder Woman has clear advantage over Hela, all you people got is just the "crushing the hammer" feat which was very weak and ignoring the rest of the movie and all the feats Wonder Woman has shown.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
Because they didn't give her pressure, with Wonder Woman keep punch her from everywhere she would be busy dodging and blocking while she could not do so.

Stop avoiding all the advantages using all kind of excuses. Wonder Woman has clear advantage over Hela, all you people got is just the "crushing the hammer" feat which was very weak and ignoring the rest of the movie and all the feats Wonder Woman has shown.

If crushing Mjolnir is weak. post a strength feat for WW that is better.

Mjolnir is weak.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
Mjolnir is weak.

Yes, Hulk couldn't lift it and Vision could. We don't say Hulk is physically weaker than Vision.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
Yes, Hulk couldn't lift it and Vision could. We don't say Hulk is physically weaker than Vision.

Hulk couldn't lift it because he wasn't worthy, not because he's weak.

It's like you have no knowledge of the characters or equipment involved.

Now we saw Superman could use his strength to help separate the Mother Box, the Apocalypse artifact and world reshaper in JL.

Stopping using the hammer feat now. The hammer was just a magical item to contain Thor's inner strength.

Originally posted by Slowpoke
Now we saw Superman could use his strength to help separate the Mother Box, the Apocalypse artifact and world reshaper in JL.

Superman isn't part of this thread, try and stay on topic.

All this thread got one weak statement, using a pure magic item to measure strength. BAD BAD argument here.