You know, Celebs and sex scandals are nothing new

Started by Surtur68 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Have to say guys, this thread has turned hilarious, legit laughed at the blatant "this is why I blame women for my shortcomings in life" post/tell-alls. Your Micropenises(sp?) have been noted. /noted.

On the bright side, one of the leftists here will no doubt bingo your response.

women aren't to blame for anything. but the personal attacks say alot. guess stats and research don't mean anything

Originally posted by Raisen
oh god. some college kid with no life experience.

ok bro. you're mind washed. i got my degree years ago so i could only imagine what's going on the campus now

called me a patriarch lol. ok.

Him being a college student explains more or less every single thing about him lol.

I bet he is the type that would take issue with "it's okay to be white" posters. Amirite, Firefly?

Originally posted by Raisen
we need to accept that men were given the bodies and the mind to lead. feminisim has done nothing but increase crime by glamorizing single mother hood and make women even more miserable by forcing them to feel in a way that is outside their biological imperative. women were happier in the yesteryears. much happier. if they are so much more free. why are so many reporting such misery and taking so many phucking anitdepressants.

i blame men for this. men that lost their god damn sense

I've met loads of great female leaders who had the chutzpah and know-how to lead projects really well. In my uni, I was considered one of the best team leaders and was objectively one of the highest achievers, and the only person above me in terms of skill and grade-achievement was a young woman. I think gender and sex is mostly useless when it comes to deciding a leader, since it relies on the individual more than anything else.

Saying men are stronger, fitter, etc. on average, yeah: that's a fact. But saying men are always, or even mostly, smarter than women is pretty much just plain wrong from everything I've seen.

EDIT: if you wanna diss me for being a 'college kid' too, just remember I'm not from the US. The stereotypes do not apply across the pond.

Originally posted by Raisen
we need to accept that men were given the bodies and the mind to lead.

Care to provide quantifiable evidence that women don't have the "mind" to lead, not just how you feel or what you have seen.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Leopards are still a threat but nothing like what meerkats face!

Male elephants travel alone, they are kicked out of the herd by females.

Leopards are still a threat but nothing like what meerkats face!

Lulz on your meerkat average size.....you really want to quibble over a few ounces on a creature that small.

There is very little doubt about orca structure and pods at this time:

http://orcalab.org/orcas/orca-social-organization/

I could counter you all day but you've obviously made up your mind. thanks for the input tho

Originally posted by Raisen
women aren't to blame for anything. but the personal attacks say alot. guess stats and research don't mean anything

It's what they do when inconvenient facts are brought up.

Originally posted by Scribble
I've met loads of great female leaders who had the chutzpah and know-how to lead projects really well. In my uni, I was considered one of the best team leaders and was objectively one of the highest achievers, and the only person above me in terms of skill and grade-achievement was a young woman. I think gender and sex is mostly useless when it comes to deciding a leader, since it relies on the individual more than anything else.

Saying men are stronger, fitter, etc. on average, yeah: that's a fact. But saying men are always, or even mostly, smarter than women is pretty much just plain wrong from everything I've seen.

EDIT: if you wanna diss me for being a 'college kid' too, just remember I'm not from the US. The stereotypes do not apply across the pond.

men are not ALWAYS.

just generally

of course I couldn't spend hours here refuting myself. so don't go down the generalization road.

Originally posted by dadudemon
And different sensitivities to those hormones, and different genes, and different chromosomes, and different cell-site receptor ratios, and different physiologies, and different lots of things that make us different.

But we are the same sort of....

I don't understand you. You just listed some things about men that make them superior to women and then you say that those superiorities do not mean they are superior.

Sure it makes Men stronger, faster, taller etc than Women, on average. It doesn't make Men harder-working, or more ambitious, or more courageous, or more intellectually sound. It doesn't mean Men are inherently more trustworthy than Women in positions of power.

I was directly referring to Raisen's definition of superiority.

Originally posted by Scribble
I've met loads of great female leaders who had the chutzpah and know-how to lead projects really well. In my uni, I was considered one of the best team leaders and was objectively one of the highest achievers, and the only person above me in terms of skill and grade-achievement was a young woman. I think gender and sex is mostly useless when it comes to deciding a leader, since it relies on the individual more than anything else.

Saying men are stronger, fitter, etc. on average, yeah: that's a fact. But saying men are always, or even mostly, smarter than women is pretty much just plain wrong from everything I've seen.

EDIT: if you wanna diss me for being a 'college kid' too, just remember I'm not from the US. The stereotypes do not apply across the pond.

Yeah but...you're giving a personal anecdote. That doesn't disprove anything.

It's like with the wage gap when people point out men on average work more hours than women and someone begins talking about a hard working woman they know. It's irrelevant.

Originally posted by Scribble
I've met loads of great female leaders who had the chutzpah and know-how to lead projects really well. In my uni, I was considered one of the best team leaders and was objectively one of the highest achievers, and the only person above me in terms of skill and grade-achievement was a young woman. I think gender and sex is mostly useless when it comes to deciding a leader, since it relies on the individual more than anything else.

Saying men are stronger, fitter, etc. on average, yeah: that's a fact. But saying men are always, or even mostly, smarter than women is pretty much just plain wrong from everything I've seen.

EDIT: if you wanna diss me for being a 'college kid' too, just remember I'm not from the US. The stereotypes do not apply across the pond.

I didn't diss him. you saw what he said to me right?
he literally acted like the caricature of college kids that right wing people make fun of. patriarchy and all of that. it was textbook how he responded
that's all

Originally posted by Surtur
It's what they do when inconvenient facts are brought up.

Okay then, can you show me the "facts" where women are inherently mentally inferior to men?

Also wait, I remember seeing some video where a guy talked about men being smarter than women, but there was an asterisk. It said women are more likely to be of average intelligence than men. While men are more likely to be above average or below average.

Anyone heard of this?

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay then, can you show me the "facts" where women are inherently mentally inferior to men?

NO, no you got it wrong. They aren't inferior, men are superior...........you gotta spin the words and print the screen upside down for it to make more sense.

Originally posted by Raisen
men are not ALWAYS.

just generally

of course I couldn't spend hours here refuting myself. so don't go down the generalization road.

I wouldn't even say generally. I'd say it was about equal. I've met a horde of dumb guys and a horde of dumb girls. I'd say that women and men have different skillsets when it comes to learning and intelligence, because intelligence is very hard to measure really, so men probably are better in some fields, whilst women excel in others. In fact I'm sure some study was done into that at some point mmm
Originally posted by Raisen
I didn't diss him. you saw what he said to me right?
he literally acted like the caricature of college kids that right wing people make fun of. patriarchy and all of that. it was textbook how he responded
that's all
I know, I just thought I should point out the regional difference

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay then, can you show me the "facts" where women are inherently mentally inferior to men?

Not mentally inferior, just different mentally. It's why on average men work more hours per week, etc.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Sure it makes Men stronger, faster, taller etc than Women, on average. It doesn't make Men harder-working, or more ambitious, or more courageous, or more intellectually sound. It doesn't mean Men are inherently more trustworthy than Women in positions of power.

I was directly referring to Raisen's definition of superiority.

women's brains respond equally to any pain. the same for a victim and a suspect. that creates a care based morality that is not just. this has been proven with brain scans.

higher testosterone increases drive and focus. women only produce this from a small portion in their body. when it runs out they produce chemicals that cause distress and leads them to lock up in stressful situations

this is science. this is proven.

once again. some will handle it better than others but in this life we have to play the cards we get

Originally posted by Surtur
Not mentally inferior, just different mentally. It's why on average men work more hours per week, etc.

So now you're shitting on your own points? Good and thanks for doing the work for me.

TIL: Men and women are different.

Originally posted by Scribble
I wouldn't even say generally. I'd say it was about equal. I've met a horde of dumb guys and a horde of dumb girls. I'd say that women and men have different skillsets when it comes to learning and intelligence, because intelligence is very hard to measure really, so men probably are better in some fields, whilst women excel in others. In fact I'm sure some study was done into that at some point mmm
I know, I just thought I should point out the regional difference

men get a lot smarter when they stop thinking with their diicks.

once again...hormones

Originally posted by Surtur
Not mentally inferior, just different mentally. It's why on average men work more hours per week, etc.

Weird, I thought that having kids and forced into maternity leave and taking time off for kids was a huge chunk of the work hour difference.....not just the desire to achieve.