Originally posted by dadudemonI've heard that conspiracy before. It's not all that hard to imagine.
While this is closer to accurate, I was making a joke about Trump being a dem before a repub and how he is so incompetent and shitty that it is more likely that he is a plant from the dems to f*ck up the GOP than it is for a person like that to be legitimately that incompetent. Robtard knows that...so his clarification is...confusing? I don't know, man! What is happening!
But yea, I tend to think the truth is probably closer to the fact that he ran as a Republican simple because that was where the window of opportunity arose; there was no way in for him as a Democrat. Really though, he had to fudge his relationship with the Clintons and flip flop his position on a number of issues just to make that run.
And isn't it funny that him and the Clintons were such great friends, and now in the aftermath of the elections we're arguing over who the bigger creep/predator is between him an Bill? They are much more like each other than we tend to portray.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Originally posted by dadudemon
I was with you until that last sentence. Pointing out the Dems hypocrisy does not require a tacit endorsement of a shitty/criminal Republican. Has he endorsed Moore?
Originally posted by Firefly218[QUOTE=16429741]Originally posted by Surtur
[QUOTE=16429739]Originally posted by Robtard
So Moore's now cool in your book? Not surprised at all, Trumper marching orders and all.Weinstein = Sexual predator
B. Clinton = Sexual predator
Moore = Innocent
Trump = Innocent/feelings
Moore isn't cool. This is why I am saying in 2-3 decades we can come revisit the fact he's not cool. We can wait until he is out of power, etc. and then go after him. [/QUOTE]
What? The? ****? [/QUOTE]
Originally posted by dadudemon
I agree with all sentences before that last one, though: he lives for the liberal tears.
His problem is that being a pretend piece of shit is indistinguishable from being an actual piece of shit. There is no scenario in which someone supports sexual predators and hebephiles and comes away looking good. If the support is true, you are human filth. If the support is a joke, you are still human filth. Jokes on us for not wanting a child ****er to be elected to public office though, amirite?
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
His problem is that being a pretend piece of shit is indistinguishable from being an actual piece of shit. There is no scenario in which someone supports sexual predators and hebephiles and comes away looking good. If the support is true, you are human filth. If the support is a joke, you are still human filth. Jokes on us for not wanting a child ****er to be elected to public office though, amirite?
You missed his point. He was mocking the Dems not going after Bill until recently for Bill's crimes.
Granted, I disagreed with him and pointed out people have been lambasting Bill since 1992 for his sexcapades (however, it was mostly the GOP doing that).
Also, I agree that Surtur sometimes is hard to pin-down. You cannot tell if he is serious, mocking, sarcastic, or posting satire. He's certainly a Poe's Law type. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law
Originally posted by dadudemon
You missed his point. He was mocking the Dems not going after Bill until recently for Bill's crimes.Granted, I disagreed with him and pointed out people have been lambasting Bill since 1992 for his sexcapades (however, it was mostly the GOP doing that).
Also, I agree that Surtur sometimes is hard to pin-down. You cannot tell if he is serious, mocking, sarcastic, or posting satire. He's certainly a Poe's Law type. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law
Hehe 🙂
Yeah, some did talk about Bill, but it was the usual suspects. Conservatives. Now the leftists are fooling exactly zero people. They do not give two shits about Bill Clinton. The only reason they went after him is because they knew if they opened their mouth about Trump they would have Bill thrown in their face.
So they think that suddenly throwing him under the bus 2 decades later makes everything square? Lolololol. Nah, and what makes me take them even less seriously is these people wouldn't be saying a damn thing if Hilary win. They have no moral high ground to stand on, they never did.
So I love their tears over Moore and Trump. I love their tears over the travel ban. I love the tears over the muslim videos where the UK frickin got Parliament involved(they are utter lunatics).
Trump Derangement Syndrome is not only sweeping the nation, but the world. The UK has shown that, and I'm going to enjoy it all, we are witnessing the greatest show on Earth, free of charge 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard[QUOTE=16430001]Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He does not truly care about accountability, or even sexual misconduct. All he cares about is "sticking it to Demz and Libz" by any means necessary. If that involves supporting hebephiles, then so be it. If his political opposition holding members on their side of the aisle accountable thins their herd, even better. Their integrity is hilarious, because he is morally bankrupt. Accountability for thee, but not for me, indeed. Hypocrisy is his personal mantra. He is a drain on the system who rails against those who actually contribute. If he had any character at all, he would take a long, hard look at himself. But he will probably just declare, "GOPerverts in charge, you triggered!"
^
[/QUOTE]
Originally posted by Surtur
Trump Derangement Syndrome is not only sweeping the nation, but the world. The UK has shown that, and I'm going to enjoy it all, we are witnessing the greatest show on Earth, free of charge 🙂
^
Looks like more padding since Mueller's investigation is gaining more and more traction.
Originally posted by Robtard
^Looks like more padding since Mueller's investigation is gaining more and more traction.
Your opinion has been noted 👆
I shall now note my own: I disagree. The rumblings we seem to be hearing about obstruction tell me that now they are shifting gears, moving away from collusion to throw all their weight behind trying to get an obstruction charge.
Originally posted by Robtard
The obstruction of justice has been spoken about since the time of Trump/Comey, it's not a new "let's try this now!" thing. It's been there all along. You surely knew that, right?
And I never said nobody uttered a peep about it. I'm saying now we're starting to hear more rumblings about it and less about collusion. IMO they see they won't get him for collusion. So they wanna show he obstructed justice so he gets impeached.
Prediction: they will not be able to do so, but will continue to push for impeachment and will attempt to use the 2018 elections as a sort of referendum on impeachment for Trump.