Mass Shootings in America Thread

Originally posted by Silent Master
I was unable to find any numbers regarding price or reliability, so what are the numbers?

I didn't find price either as I don't think it's in a commercial phase. Reliability info is as previously stated although as I stated initially it is a claim by the manufacturer. Take from that what you will.

Never trust the manufacturer, I'd want to see someone like consumer reports or another third party tester do major stress testing.

If they ever get them to the point where it's both affordable and realiable. I'd probably get one installed, even if it wasn't required.

Originally posted by jaden101
Again, by that logic you wouldn't have any safety advancements in any field. Have airbags in cars malfunctioned and injured and killed people? Yes. Does that mean they should never have been implemented?

Your second point is as I stated it should be. Having no more a chance of failing than any other part of a gun. That comes with investment and R&D.

Your third point is retarded. I don't see how circumventing one safety feature would give a criminal the ability to prevent someone else's weapon from working.

As far as cars go, there IS a concern with modern vehicles being hackable..

I'm not saying the Feds murdered Michael Hastings, but the technology is there.

https://twitter.com/LRBitisnot/status/968368366133104641

Scroll down to the picture right below it in the first response to the tweet. The two pictures.

What do people think about the gun info about Israel? And Switzerland? I tried to link the pics directly but couldn't.

I got them now:

Not sure if they are true. If so I do find it interesting.

Gun statistics in countries tend to be more complex than a few words in a meme.

Funny, I've never hear people call it complex when they're using other countries to support gun bans.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Funny, I've never hear people call it complex when they're using other countries to support gun bans.

More complex than a meme though.

For all the anti gun people.

Secratary of State Condis Rice dad would shoot his gun in the air when the KKK by their house when she was a kid to defend his family to stop from them from being beaten or worse, lynched/killed.

Who was supposed to defend them if not for her dad with a gun.

Ti's on the drink again. Might make him an honorary Scot.

link

Originally posted by jaden101
More complex than a meme though.

Not by much, considering people usually leave out 99% of the context to go along with those stats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not by much, considering people usually leave out 99% of the context to go along with those stats.

A. Gun control advocate cites Australia gun laws with before and after mass shootings stats

B. Pro gun advocates highlight differences between gun cultures in said countries as reasons for differences.

B. Pro gun advocates cite Switzerland and Israel gun Proliferation rates comparable to US and relatively low gun crime rates but without comparing respective gun cultures, conscripted national military service, government allocation and auditing of ammunition and numerous other factors but that's apparently acceptable.

Originally posted by Blindside12
link

Quit dodging Jaden

Originally posted by Blindside12
Quit dodging Jaden

Dodging what? You didn't even make a point. You just drunkenly gibbered nonsense.

I don't drink. And I just posted a story and provided the source for the story.

Interesting how "but apparently that's acceptable" is only added when you point out a pro-second Amendment person didn't provide full context.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Of course I would demand that it actually works. If your phone's security doesn't work, you're slightly inconvenienced. if your gun doesn't work. you're dead.

The "average"person may access their phones 10 plus times a day using finger print recognition. It's a world wide feature that's been proven to work & be reliable. It's also a built-in tech feature that hasn't increased the price of the phone itself.

Now instead of relying on people trying to invent & implement the same safety feature to guns....why don't the major gun manufacturers approach Samsung or Apple use/share the technology that they've already implemented on a mass scale?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Interesting how "but apparently that's acceptable" is only added when you point out a pro-second Amendment person didn't provide full context.

Because that's what Surt just did.

See.That's what happens when you neglect context.

Originally posted by Blindside12
I don't drink. And I just posted a story and provided the source for the story.

Crack then. Whatever.