Originally posted by aalyasecura95
maybe it is inappropriate for me to point out how we keep seeing men do these shootings? this links in well with the feminist argument that men are damaged by the patriarchy because of social norms which drive them to depression. maybe the bigger question here is about the state of are society and how we treat the mentally ill. however it is clear that we must get rid of these weapons. at least from the mentally ill who are too irresponsible. but there is a bigger question here about the nature of these attackers and what drove them to their condition.
Lol, the feminist argument of the patriarchy in general is retarded these days.
On top of that, no...it's not clear we must get rid of these weapons.
And we do have laws to make sure those who are both mentally ill and dangerous are not able to buy firearms if both those things are documented. What we need is better enforcement of existing laws and tighter background checks, not feminist propaganda.
maybe because she is a feminist who has had to endure death threats and trolling because she spoke out against an entire industry???? and no the feminist argument about patriarchy is very relevant and explains the heightened depression and suicide among men. our social norms are damaging and we must address them. of course that is just part of the problem but it is something that we need to start talking about.
Originally posted by aalyasecura95
maybe because she is a feminist who has had to endure death threats and trolling because she spoke out against an entire industry???? and no the feminist argument about patriarchy is very relevant and explains the heightened depression and suicide among men. our social norms are damaging and we must address them. of course that is just part of the problem but it is something that we need to start talking about.
She has received death threats and it's wrong. However, she has also whined about things like...people calling her stupid. It becomes quite clear she just doesn't want anyone to say *anything* about her. As I recall she's admitted she's not even that big into video games.
You're speaking nonsense. I remember talking to you before: you believe in the gender wage gap and a rape culture in the USA lol.
I bet you'd burst into flames upon coming into contact with a Christina Hoff Sommers book.
Originally posted by Surtur
She has received death threats and it's wrong. However, she has also whined about things like...people calling her stupid. It becomes quite clear she just doesn't want anyone to say *anything* about her.You're speaking nonsense. I remember talking to you before: you believe in the gender wage gap and a rape culture in the USA lol.
I bet you'd burst into flames upon coming into contact with a Christina Hoff Sommers book.
Death threats are wrong, however they are also very common on the internet. her getting them doesn't prove anything.
I'd need to see reports where the threats were reporeted to the police/FBI and were found credible.
Originally posted by Surturshe has every right to fight back against abuse. also you don't need to be an expert on video games to criticize them. you just need to know about feminism and how to identify sexism in media.
She has received death threats and it's wrong. However, she has also whined about things like...people calling her stupid. It becomes quite clear she just doesn't want anyone to say *anything* about her. As I recall she's admitted she's not even that big into video games.You're speaking nonsense. I remember talking to you before: you believe in the gender wage gap and a rape culture in the USA lol.
I bet you'd burst into flames upon coming into contact with a Christina Hoff Sommers book.
also the gender wage gap and the rape culture are both true. i stand by my statements in support of them.
Originally posted by Kurkexcuse me???? so antia is immature and not the trolls who tried to threaten her life. legal action is 100% justified in that instance. in europe there is a difference between hate speech and free speech and they have far less of this sexism and hate. maybe we should learn something from them.
Anita tried to sue her trolls which just shows how emotional immature she is. You seriously can't handle a bunch of attention seekers on the internet yet we should trust your opinion on "big issues"
Originally posted by Silent Masterah yes white men so value woman's opinion when they agree. not when they are speaking out against their privilege.
YouTube video
Originally posted by Silent Master
Gun with fingerprint scanner.
They're mostly done by similar enterprises. Prototypes made by individuals or small businesses. Some have different methods. Identilock covers the whole trigger and is physically removed like the old steering locks on cars.
The safe gun technology retrofits weapons in the handle and is similar to the one you posted. It claims much more reliable fingerprint technology than current iPhones. Unsure of the cost to the user to get it retrofitted though.
Like any technology, costs per unit will lower upon scaling up of production. Reliability will increase also but like any mechanism won't be 100% reliable.
I understand the potential of a delayed unlock potentially causing danger in say a home invasion scenario but that is something geofencing could accommodate. It would negate the need for a fingerprint unlock in the home or within other designated areas. It's purpose is to prevent unauthorised people from using the gun which would in turn stop stolen guns from being used or at least put another barrier in place. This also brings to mind another option of "smart guns" where an owner can disable a gun remotely if they find it has been stolen as they can do with phones now.
Lots of options when it comes to using technology to make guns safer in a myriad of circumstances. It can help prevent kids accidentally discharging weapons and killing or injuring themselves or others. It can help prevent gun suicides of owner's family members and perhaps prevent the suicide from happening at all allowing the suicidal person to get help (gun suicides are more "successful" than other methods).
There's no one answer to helping prevent gun deaths of any type.
There are tons of ways to tackle the issue from all angles. Gun culture, mental health, access to weapons, gang culture, organised crime, drugs, poverty.
The problem is a lack of real commitment to tackling it.
As I said previously though, America isn't really good at tackling the social or health care aspects but it is tremendous at technological innovation and implementation. Play to your strengths.
Originally posted by Surtur
She's entitled to do as she wishes, but the fact the democrats allowed it to happen is the hypocrisy.I don't even know which student this is, I know her name, but I'm not sure what she has said in the past on CNN etc. I only bring that up because some of these teens have spread either lies or misleading information. So if she was one of them that makes it even worse.
Speaking of CNN they claim to be fair and balanced, but I don't recall seeing them talk to any of the pro gun Parkland students.
Well yeah, it wasn't a white guy so it doesn't fit the narrative.
You're generalising again. You can't call one person a hypocrite because another person of the same political persuasion criticised someone for a similar action. If she had criticised Trump for using survivors to raise money for the republicans then cited her own experience as a survivor to raise money for the democrats then fair enough, she'd be a hypocrite.