Mass Shootings in America Thread

Started by Silent Master264 pages

Let's say we ban the AR-15. Mass shooters will simply use a different weapon, now what?

Come on bro...the cnn town hall was staged...other students did come forward saying CNN didn't want them in the air cause they wouldn't follow the narrative

Of course they're coached. I mean when Dana Loasch tried explaining that this was the sheriffs fault they changed the subject and went back to blame the NRA

Fact is this....the sheriff had been called several times about this guy, HE CALLED THE SHERIFF warning him. The cops had been called on him several times, he had assaulted people and made death threats via social media. The FBI had leads on him

If he had been arrested and charged just one with a felony, he couldn't have legally obtained a gun.

Owning a gun is a right, end of story, and I don't even own a gun.

Also that Hogg kid was challenging Alex jones to a debate in guns then backed out when jones said lets do it.

you've been coached, broski.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg

That is funny. Mainly because it is normally the Leftist FASCISTS that do the Shouting Down at this type of Event..

Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12
Come on bro...the cnn town hall was staged...other students did come forward saying CNN didn't want them in the air cause they wouldn't follow the narrative

Of course they're coached. I mean when Dana Loasch tried explaining that this was the sheriffs fault they changed the subject and went back to blame the NRA

Fact is this....the sheriff had been called several times about this guy, HE CALLED THE SHERIFF warning him. The cops had been called on him several times, he had assaulted people and made death threats via social media. The FBI had leads on him

If he had been arrested and charged just one with a felony, he couldn't have legally obtained a gun.

Owning a gun is a right, end of story, and I don't even own a gun.

CNN is pure garbage.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let's say we ban the AR-15. Mass shooters will simply use a different weapon, now what?

Well ok I'll bite.

Let's say you guys ban the AR-15 & then if there's a significant pattern to the "next gun of choice", ban that too?

How about, as a social experiment, ban the sales of assault rifles just for 2 years & see if it makes a difference at all, regarding mass shootings.

Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12

If he had been arrested and charged just one with a felony, he couldn't have legally obtained a gun.

Owning a gun is a right, end of story, and I don't even own a gun.

Is there even any evidence that he legally obtained the gun?

I recall an article where a gun shop owner denied all responsibility for selling a mass shooter his weapons but I can't remember which specific mass shooting he was referring to...

Can't wait for the creation of the AR-16.

Which would just end up with the shooters going to yet another gun. So ban that one too?

If your social experiment ends up showing the mass shooters just moved to a different gun, would the legal gun owners get their weapons back plus compensation for having them taken away for 2 years?

Yes. The only people deserving to be PROTECTED by Guns is Themselves. Lefty Politician and Celeberties DESERVE to be PROTECTED!

The rest of us.... WE can get PHUUUED!

To backtrack a little bit, I remember someone mentioning fingerprint scanners on a gun in order to make them safer. Here is a kid working on that very thing and they mention that it's not very reliable as of yet and the tech would run about $250.

https://youtu.be/wueZubd_S2o

There's fingerprint scanners on smart phones & the tech hasn't affected the price.

You're aware that unlike guns, a phone has a built in computer and power source right?

Originally posted by Silent Master
To backtrack a little bit, I remember someone mentioning fingerprint scanners on a gun in order to make them safer. Here is a kid working on that very thing and they mention that it's not very reliable as of yet and the tech would run about $250.

https://youtu.be/wueZubd_S2o

Seems like a good start. Imagine what could be achieved with the resources of a large manufacturer.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're aware that unlike guns, a phone has a built in computer and power source right?

And you're aware that a phone is comparatively smaller than an assault rifle so incorporating a "built in" computer & power source is no big deal, right?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let's say we ban the AR-15. Mass shooters will simply use a different weapon, now what?

I still haven't even seen a single valid argument for banning these weapons.

They aren't used in most shootings and in fact usage of them is quite rare.

"Liberals are butthurt" and "uninformed teens are whining" are not valid reasons. And I'm pretty sure we've had school shootings where rifles weren't used with high body counts.

EDIT: Found it, Virginia Tech.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_shooting

Check the guns used. Check the body count. 2 pistols. 33 dead.

I'm pretty sure no lefty wants Muslims packing heat, either.