Supreme Leader Snoke vs Darth Maul (TPM)

Started by quanchi1127 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by relentless1
context eludes you once again Quan... what did you think would happen when a guy who's mostly robot gets hit by electricity??
I am saying that because his body is in a suit. That's what his retarded logic ignores. Snoke's body is older and ridden with osteoporosis and has no bearing on a force battle between Snoke and Maul. The same reason fl being more effective against Vader due to his suit has no bearing on an actual fight since he has the means to ward it off with his saber. You misunderstood my point and the reason I used that logic as it doesn't pertain to a fight between characters.

Darth Thor Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
That is like saying General Hux is more competent at commanding the First Order than Kylo therefore he beats him in a fight.

Are you ten years old ?

Vader was killed by force lightning therefore he's weaker than someone who doesn't die after a few seconds of fl. That's irrelevant. Yoda died to old age therefore he's the worst. For ****s sake your logic is retarded and irrelevant.

Lame excuse. Snoke didn’t die of old age or electricity. He died by being sliced in 2, the same thing which didn’t kill Maul. Maul’s survival was specifically attributed to his power in the dark side.

Try again.

MythLord Diamond

There was once a random Sith Lord who survived his head getting chopped off... He was literally just a head. Sion can survive damn-near anything if a nexus is strong enough. Guess they're the most powerful Sith Lords of all?

Darth Thor Senior Member
Originally posted by MythLord
There was once a random Sith Lord who survived his head getting chopped off... He was literally just a head. Sion can survive damn-near anything if a nexus is strong enough. Guess they're the most powerful Sith Lords of all?

Not Canon.

MythLord Diamond

Doesn't matter. It's the exact same thing, just a different continuity: two beings using the Dark Side of the Force to survive things nobody else would survive.

Azronger Azronger Reborn
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Snoke murders him.

Reasons, my friend? 🙂

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lame excuse. Snoke didn’t die of old age or electricity. He died by being sliced in 2, the same thing which didn’t kill Maul. Maul’s survival was specifically attributed to his power in the dark side.

Try again.

He had a younger body. Was he cut in two when he died to Kenobi. **** no. Yoda dies of old age therefore he's the worst according to this absurd logic. Snoke destroys Maul with his force powers. This logic is legit retarded.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Azronger
Reasons, my friend? 🙂
Superior force power you cowardly cuck.

Beniboybling Worst Member

Originally posted by MythLord
Doesn't matter. It's the exact same thing, just a different continuity: two beings using the Dark Side of the Force to survive things nobody else would survive.
Myth is right, Snoke is even weaker than a severed head. 🙁

Darth Thor Senior Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
He had a younger body. Was he cut in two when he died to Kenobi. **** no. Yoda dies of old age therefore he's the worst according to this absurd logic. Snoke destroys Maul with his force powers. This logic is legit retarded.

No one died of old age here. Snoke died being cut in 2. That didnt kill Maul.

Darth Thor Senior Member
Originally posted by MythLord
Doesn't matter. It's the exact same thing, just a different continuity: two beings using the Dark Side of the Force to survive things nobody else would survive.

I would get into this argument if it was actually Canon.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No one died of old age here. Snoke died being cut in 2. That didnt kill Maul.
Palpatine died by being thrown down a shaft. Maul was cut in half and fell down a long drop off. Does that mean Maul beats Palpatine ? For **** sake this is some of the worst logic I've ever witnessed used as a legit defense.

Snoke destroys him with the force. Yoda needs a cane to walk Kenobi doesn't. Does that mean Kenobi beats him when their powers are involved. No.

JKBart Restricted

Snoke roflstomps Maul and then dies from fatigue imo

Darth Thor Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Palpatine died by being thrown down a shaft. Maul was cut in half and fell down a long drop off. Does that mean Maul beats Palpatine ? For **** sake this is some of the worst logic I've ever witnessed used as a legit defense.

Snoke destroys him with the force. Yoda needs a cane to walk Kenobi doesn't. Does that mean Kenobi beats him when their powers are involved. No.

Palpatine disintegrated in the Death Star core and used all his Force power to try to stop Vader. STop bringing up completely irrelevant examples.

ares834 Senior Member
Originally posted by MythLord
There was once a random Sith Lord who survived his head getting chopped off... He was literally just a head. Sion can survive damn-near anything if a nexus is strong enough. Guess they're the most powerful Sith Lords of all?
Originally posted by MythLord
Doesn't matter. It's the exact same thing, just a different continuity: two beings using the Dark Side of the Force to survive things nobody else would survive.

👆

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Palpatine disintegrated in the Death Star core and used all his Force power to try to stop Vader. STop bringing up completely irrelevant examples.
He died from the fall. So you're saying he burned out his force power in those seconds he was trying to hurt Vader. This is getting more pitiful and nonsensical by the post. Yoda physically needs a cane to walk does that mean with force powers Maul beats him. You're acting like you don't even understand the basic premise of the logic you're using here.

Prof. T.C McAbe Kryptonian Scientist

Snoke wins with movie feats only. With the TV Show it's much closer.

Darth Thor Senior Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
He died from the fall.

No he didn't. Stop bullshitting all the time.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No he didn't. Stop bullshitting all the time.
We see the fall killed him unlike Maul. Regardless you're missing the point. Maul's body is far healthier and spry than Palpatine's when he's older in Rotj. That isn't relevant at all in a duel between them. It's like saying this guy can lift more weight but in a fight he gets destroyed by the guy with the weaker chest. The strength of his chest doesn't determine who is the better fighter.

MythLord Diamond
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I would get into this argument if it was actually Canon.

The same rules apply, Canon or no. Either give me an actual rebuttle, or shut up.