Originally posted by The EllimistMaul lost out of his prime. I have explained batman used weakness exploitation to beat Superman. Batman is ruthless Superman is a pansy. His morals were called out by Faora in Man of Steel. Superman's morals are a weakness.
One thing I'm sure people have called you out on before is that you're so inconsistent in when you are willing to analyze the context behind a win/loss. Well, actually, you're pretty consistent - you only care about whether it helps a character you like or hurts one you dislike. When Maul loses to someone you immediately come up with the most asinine and convoluted explanations, but when Superman loses to someone [b]who had kryptonite you don't even bother to entertain the most obvious excuses and just repeat silly semantical hit jobs like he lost to a "human". [/B]
I despise Windu as a character but he defeated Palpatine who I like more. I'm objective. I also don't like Luke Skywalker at all but admit he destroyed Vader. These are two examples of me accepting reality when the guy I like more loses. I've seen Palpatine fans reject reality altogether to misinterpret quotes or pretend he threw the fight against Windu.
Originally posted by The EllimistHe is in his prime and was assessing his foes. Hell, Doomsday was just created in Batman v. Superman. Was he at a disadvantage ?
@quanchi so "out of his prime" is valid but "just woke up from death and clearly not mentally right" or "is fighting his father who he doesn't want to kill" aren't?
Originally posted by quanchi112
He is in his prime and was assessing his foes. Hell, Doomsday was just created in Batman v. Superman. Was he at a disadvantage ?
Doomsday probably could have grown stronger, but that's besides the point if the OP specifies BvS Doomsday and not a hypothetical one. But a Superman better composed than the one who just got revived isn't hypothetical, he shows up like 20 minutes later in the same film.
You have no sense of objective analysis here. If I just replaced the character names with letters and masked some revealing details you'd end up shitting on Maul and praising Superman, or rather you'd struggle not to honestly compare their feats but to figure out which is the character you personally prefer.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I've seen Palpatine fans reject reality altogether to misinterpret quotes or pretend he threw the fight against Windu.
Only Sidious DID take a dive, or do you think that the guy who casually manhandle two Sith and easily kill 3 Jedi simultaneously would just lose to Mace Windu like that??
Originally posted by Adam GrimesSo you're saying it is impossible to place his hammer on Superman's chest while standing up ? Ok he knocks him down with a hammer strike then lays it on him.
I didn't know a giant open mouth and the chest of a man that's standing up had the same layingdownhammer propierties. 👆#Quanatomics
🙂
Originally posted by The EllimistPoint is you're hypocritical and abandon the same silly logic when I cite another example because it's silly. Superman's powers worked fine and he was assessing the possible threats right away. He doesn't need to solve an equation to defend himself.
Doomsday probably could have grown stronger, but that's besides the point if the OP specifies BvS Doomsday and not a hypothetical one. But a Superman better composed than the one who just got revived isn't hypothetical, he shows up like 20 minutes later in the same film.You have no sense of objective analysis here. If I just replaced the character names with letters and masked some revealing details you'd end up shitting on Maul and praising Superman, or rather you'd struggle not to honestly compare their feats but to figure out which is the character you personally prefer.
He didn't beat Steppenwolf or even seriously harm him either.
No, since you abandoned your insanely biased logic when I cited another example. I love Maul and not Windu. I believe Windu defeats Maul so that is yet another example of the guy I think is bland and unappealing beats the guy who is currently in my top three Star Wars characters. That's disproving your ridiculous theory.
Originally posted by relentless1Yes, since the other Jedi aren't Windu level. Lucas even states Windu is on the upper level while the other guys aren't. This isn't rocket science. Windu defeated him but Anakin turned and aided Sidious.
Only Sidious DID take a dive, or do you think that the guy who casually manhandle two Sith and easily kill 3 Jedi simultaneously would just lose to Mace Windu like that??