Wolverine vs. Black Panther

Originally posted by Silent Master
Statements without feats backing them up are worthless.

Then why do movies place them in the first place? For fun? Do you know the meaning of worthless?

Nothing you posted changes the fact that statements are worthless without feats backing them up.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Vibranium:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jpNYG5AoAI

Adamantium:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1oUy-RwW9c

[B] Vibranium clearly melt and even exploded. Adamantium got red due to the heat, but didn't melt nor deformed.

There are no actual numbers as to how much heat these metals received in the above videos. So there isn't a direct comparison.

However i would say the heat received by both Adamantium and Vibranium above must be arround the same.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNtJlpGKL2Y

Which one cuts better?

A sharp knife or a sharp HOT KNIFE?

The Silver Samurai used a super hot Adamantium Katana to cut Wolverine's claws!

Considering we saw Wolverine's claws blocking Energy Beams without damage, that Sword must have been RIDICULOUSLY HOT!

Adamantium>Vibranium. [/B]

Silent Master did you obmit this? Did you pretended to be blind and ignored my post?

Thank you for posting proof that it takes more force to damage vibranium.

IOW, Vibranium > adamantium.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thank you for posting proof that it takes more force to damage vibranium.

IOW, Vibranium > adamantium.

I guess you are reading the wrong post.

Nope, your links clearly show admantium is far more easily damaged.

Thank you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nope, your links clearly show admantium is far more easily damaged.

Thank you.

Your opinion is respected.

However since you gave 0 evidence to back up your claim it's worthless for debating 😉

The links you provided show adamantium being damaged easier. so thank you for proving me right.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The links you provided show adamantium being damaged easier. so thank you for proving me right.

According to?

To people with eyes.

Originally posted by Silent Master
To people with eyes.

Ohh so no actual evidence or research to back it up.

Your opinion is respected!!! 😂

The links you posted is the evidence. you can clearly see how easy is was to damage admantium in comparison to vibranium.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The links you posted is the evidence. you can clearly see how easy is was to damage admantium in comparison to vibranium.

Except the Adamantium wasn't damaged where as Ultron's suit got destroyed!

So again, did you watch the correct videos?

Not damaged? his claws were cut off. maybe you should actually watch the clips before posting them.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not damaged? his claws were cut off. maybe you should actually watch the clips before posting them.

By an adamantium hot katana.

We've seen Wolv's Claws cut through everything like if it was butter. Now imagine a Super Hot- Super Sharp- Adamantium Katana!

Again, how does that relate to Vibranium's feat!!????

Besides you decided to ignore the fact that Wolv's claws withstood "Cyclops" beams where as Vibranium got melted by a some-what similar force! (IM, Vision, and Thor's attacks)

So? His claws held up just fine prior to the heated sword, that means it was the heat that made the difference not the weapon. And Thor's lightning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclops's optic blast.

Lightning strikes on the low end give off a billion joules per 10 microseconds. Or to make it easier a hundred trillion joules per second.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So? His claws held up just fine prior to the heated sword, that means it was the heat that made the difference not the weapon. And Thor's lightning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclops's optic blast.

Lightning strikes on the low end give off a billion joules per 10 microseconds. Or to make it easier a hundred trillion joules per second.

The heat aided the weapon in cutting the claws. Just like a hot knife cuts easier than a normal knife.

If it was merely due to the heat then Cyclops beams should have been able to do the same in Wolverine's Origins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So? His claws held up just fine prior to the heated sword, that means it was the heat that made the difference not the weapon. And Thor's lightning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclops's optic blast.

Lightning strikes on the low end give off a billion joules per 10 microseconds. Or to make it easier a hundred trillion joules per second.

Based on what is Thor's Lightning > Cyclops Laser beams??

Do you have actual evidence to back that up?

Based on feats and the fact that lightning gives off a billion joules of energy per 10 microseconds, which is 100 trillion joules of energy per second.

You ignoring evidence does not mean I haven't provided it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Based on feats and the fact that lightning gives off a billion joules of energy per 10 microseconds, which is 100 trillion joules of energy per second.

You ignoring evidence does not mean I haven't provided it.

Just means that Thor's lightning is powerful, not that it is > Cyclops beams!

Besides, the amount of energy depends on the size of the lightning.

The lightning that impact Ultron isn't as powerful as the one we saw in New York or in Asgard.