Ozymandias (Movie Version) Vs Sunny (Into The Badlands)

Started by h1a86 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Beating groups of white belts in no way proves that you're more skilled than a back belt. You're just making things up.

But back to topic, Sunny >>>>Ozy >>>>> Nite owl and Rorschach in skill.

I've seen thugs beat the shit outta black belts. Same size too.

Feats >>>>>>Experience and training.
Cap>>>>>>>Thor in h2h yet Thor has hundreds of times more experience and training.

That's why we go by feats. Clippers don't have any.
If 3 random thugs fought one in h2h then there is no evidence that they can win without getting hit or hurt a little.

You of all people tried to say that Baleman was a horrible fighter (super slow) while disregarding his training. That was your logic.

Sunny isnt that great tbh.

By feats Sunny >>>>Ozy >>>>> Nite owl and Rorschach.

Sunny destroys
Ozy can’t hurt him

Originally posted by Silent Master
By feats Sunny >>>>Ozy >>>>> Nite owl and Rorschach.

Ozy beat two individuals, that are capable of beating multiple thugs without getting touched, simultaneously in h2h without getting touched.

Sunny beat fodder featless Clippers.

Ozy caught a bullet at close range.

So how are Sunny's feats better?

Originally posted by h1a8
Ozy beat two individuals, that are capable of beating multiple thugs without getting touched, simultaneously in h2h without getting touched.

Sunny beat fodder featless Clippers.

Ozy caught a bullet at close range.

So how are Sunny's feats better?

Sunny has beaten far more than just Clippers.

Sunny >>>> Ozy in skill.

Sunny dismantled a man who had killed 999 people.
He took down the third most powerful of the Dark Ones after MK and the Master, Abbot Cyan.
He took on several Barons and proved to be better than all of them, even Quinn, who Sunny fought while severely wounded and weakened from an extended fight, several explosions, and an arrow or two in him.

Not to mention massive slabs of rock falling on him

The fact that h1 thought that Sunny has only ever fought featless Clippers just proves that he doesn't have the first clue about what he's talking about.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Sunny has beaten far more than just Clippers.

Sunny >>>> Ozy in skill.

Clippers are the most skilled beings he beat in h2h.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The fact that h1 thought that Sunny has only ever fought featless Clippers just proves that he doesn't have the first clue about what he's talking about.

The argument is that he never beat 2 beings simultaneously that are capable of beating multiple thugs without getting touched, without getting touched.

Originally posted by h1a8
Clippers are the most skilled beings he beat in h2h.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you for proving that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Lol!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you for proving that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

You needed proof? 😄

Originally posted by Silent Master
Lol!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you for proving that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

He did not beat any monks in h2h without getting touched (or at all).

Originally posted by h1a8
He did not beat any monks in h2h without getting touched (or at all).

Your claim was that the Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat, are you backing away from that retarded statement?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your claim was that the Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat, are you backing away from that retarded statement?

If you understand what I posted then you wouldn’t have posted this.

Are you backing away from this retarded claim?

Originally posted by h1a8
Clippers are the most skilled beings he beat in h2h.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Are you backing away from this retarded claim?

The statement is true.

Originally posted by h1a8
The statement is true.

Prove it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it.
You can’t prove a negative. You can only disprove it.