Ozymandias (Movie Version) Vs Sunny (Into The Badlands)

Started by Silent Master6 pages

That isn't a negative.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That isn't a negative.

Sunny didn’t beat anyone more skilled than a clipper in h2h.
That indeed is a negative.

Your claim was that the Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat, that isn't a negative.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your claim was that the Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat, that isn't a negative.

“Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat” implies that “Sunny DIDNT beat anyone more skilled that a clipper in h2h.”

Originally posted by h1a8
Clippers are the most skilled beings he beat in h2h.

The above statement isn't a negative claim and no amount of you trying to weasel out of it will change that fact.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The above statement isn't a negative claim and no amount of you trying to weasel out of it will change that fact.

“Clippers were the most skilled people Sunny beat” impliesthat “Sunny DIDNT beat anyone more skilled that a clipper in h2h.”

Back up your claim.

Seriously, how retarded is his argument. he is basically saying that you could claim that a random Shield agent is more skilled than Ozy and then when called on it. Go, "A random Shield agent is more skilled than Ozy implies that Ozy isn't as skilled as a random Shield agent."

Originally posted by Silent Master
Seriously, how retarded is his argument. he is basically saying that you could claim that a random Shield agent is more skilled than Ozy and then when called on it. Go, "A random Shield agent is more skilled than Ozy [b]implies that Ozy isn't as skilled as a random Shield agent." [/B]

A negative can be disproven.

Originally posted by h1a8
A negative can be disproven.

Back up your claim.