Originally posted by Freedon Nadd
1. To confirm the rumors?
2. So, it is after Nihilus' death. Of course Vitiate would be the one.
3. You do have a point post-Ziost. But isn't a ritual's role to help you do what you cannot normally do?
1.No it wasn't to confirm rumors, it was to show that Vitiate could take it to the next, level is what I got. afterall wiping a planet is not to the extreme with the darkside, if you look at Naga sadow's supernova manipulation, which frankly is in another league in terms of power, using rituals. however it makes more sense to be on the extreme end if it were done without any Ritual/device, but pure mastery.
2.yeah, he was portrayed to be a worse threat by the Novel, so clearly he would have quotes by Swtor.
3.Think of it this way. there is around 100 billion stars in the Milky way, so we can assume the SW galaxy would have something similar, it is also quoted somewhere that their is around 10 million habitable systems(quote me if i'm wrong) according to meetras testament, of stars going black, confirmed by Wraths vision of the galaxy being drained, turning black. Vitiate through the use of Ritual would need a considerable amount of power to start such a thing. Is one planet being Death field without ritual really that unbelievable? In comparison to what Vitiate nearly achieved.
Why can't you quite believe it? paired with other statements(revan) etc, and Nihilus's actions to Katarr who is canonically inferior to Vitiate. Vitiates power spent 1300 years passively keeping Nathema as a Void, denying the basis of life.
Afterall their is a basis to assume it was done without use of ritual, going by the context of Swtor, along with other feats/statements. Compared to arguing that it was a Ritual, in which you have no evidence. And the burden of proof falls on to you. We know Ziost occured, and since you have no argument that it was a ritual, nor any evidence, which favors it without use of Ritual, we can comfortably assume he did it from his own power, until evidence comes out suggesting otherwise.