Scarlet Witch vs Supergirl

Started by DarkSaint8522 pages

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I understand the poison, what you are,not understanding is weakening the bomb before it explodes is absolutely nowhere near the same as tanking it without weakening it

There is a (vast) difference in energy that is released

How vast is the difference? What are the calcs?

I never denied he absorbed, never said he didn't. But it was also shown and stated that by absorbing the power out of it, he "disarmed" it. A bomb cannot explode if you disarm it

the feat could be quantified for absorption, but no he wasn't hit by the explosion

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
are you blatantly ignoring the panel DIRECTLY from the comic and relying on inaccurate databook statements?

It literally says "The Maggedon warhead has been disarmed"

Do you know what disarmed means?


It's not databook. It's a secret files which gives the details of the comic.

He absorbed the anti sunlight. It's even stated in the comic dimwit.

"I can absorb sunlight, why not anti sunlight".

He is even shown absorbing it.

It's not a typical bomb with red/green wire.

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I mean... do you think body builders can punch harder than Mike Tyson?

No, but they can't fly either.

Bring proof from the comics. Not from real life.

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I never denied he absorbed, never said he didn't. But it was also shown and stated that by absorbing the power out of it, he "disarmed" it. A bomb cannot explode if you disarm it

the feat could be quantified for absorption, but no he wasn't hit by the explosion


Yes, it was exploding. We even saw a literal explosion.

Orion: "Detonation! In highfather name, have we failed".

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I never denied he absorbed, never said he didn't. But it was also shown and stated that by absorbing the power out of it, he "disarmed" it. A bomb cannot explode if you disarm it

the feat could be quantified for absorption, but no he wasn't hit by the explosion

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
LOL several? Hahaha I'd love to see this, and it was never confirmed he absorbed the hypernova. all he did was push the gears which is a known unquantifable feat

We're a bit sharper here on these forums; you WILL get caught out lol.

It's also quantified for durability. Because it was poison to him.

How vast is the difference between absorbing the energy and having it explode?

80%?
50%?
20%?
10%?
1%?

Even at 1%, that's still enough energy to vape 500million solar systems or whatever, lol.

Originally posted by abhilegend
No, but they can't fly either.

Bring proof from the comics. Not from real life.
Yes, it was exploding. We even saw a literal explosion.

Orion: "Detonation! In highfather name, have we failed".

What, a tiny ass explosion even though he took out its power?

Also, assumption from Orion as the next panel says what? Oh, that's right. This

"DOOMSDAY IS CANCELLED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. THE MAGEDDON WARHEAD HAS BEEN DISARMED"

"Bring proof from the comics"

That's even If there is even PROOF in the comics that punching power equals lifting strength, but there's no scan. so Im using real life examples on it

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We're a bit sharper here on these forums; you WILL get caught out lol.

It's also quantified for durability. Because it was poison to him.

How vast is the difference between absorbing the energy and having it explode?

80%?
50%?
20%?
10%?
1%?

Even at 1%, that's still enough energy to vape 500million solar systems or whatever, lol.

I would need the time frame, estimate how long he took to absorb it. didn't he say 10 or 15 min?

Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I would need the time frame, estimate how long he took to absorb it. didn't he say 10 or 15 min?

You tell me, you're the expert here.

Just remember that there are around 400billion stars in the galaxy, and it was going to vape (not just destroy, or affect, but completely vapourise) half of them.

So 200billion stars would have been vapourised. Now, even if we say the absorption means that there was only 0.1% of the energy present, that's still enough energy to wipe out 200million stars, lol.

So go ahead. I'm waiting for your calcs.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
You tell me, you're the expert here.

Just remember that there are around 400billion stars in the galaxy, and it was going to vape (not just destroy, or affect, but completely vapourise) half of them.

So 200billion stars would have been vapourised. Now, even if we say the absorption means that there was only 0.1% of the energy present, that's still enough energy to wipe out 200million stars, lol.

So go ahead. I'm waiting for your calcs.

Alright.

So Supes said he had 10 mins. Theres nothing that indicates that was the exact time it took for him to absorb thus energy, he couldve done it much faster. So now I'll quantify it based on the low end (lowest answer it can be ) off a timeframe of 10 mins to absorb

the joules thats required to destroy the Milky Way Galaxy is -4e58 joules

Half of it is
- 2e58 joules

Lowballing it as him absorbing that energy in 10 minutes would mean he absorbed.... - 3.33e55 joules per second until fully disarmed

Holy shit, the dude absorbed 33 septendecillion joules per second, which is equivalent to 7.95 duodecillion megatons of TNT:

https://postimg.cc/image/3r8jscwe3/cfdd1eb8/

Or wait. think I kinda messed up, I'll just go with this dude's calc which is 3e53 joules

https://www.quora.com/How-much-force-is-needed-to-destroy-a-galaxy

Half of that power is 1.5e53 joules

Assuming he absorbed that power in 10 minutes (lowball)...

Meaning he absorbed 1.5e53 joules in 600 seconds....

Results in him absorbing 2.5e50 joules per second

25 quindecillion joules per second is ALOT of energy

That equates to 59 decillion megatons of TNT
https://postimg.cc/image/tf4nexknf/414855ff/

That's 2,500,000x more powerful than a supernova

Still an absorption feat though. Yeah, it being poison means he durable to it, but that's only in (that) regard

In terms of the sheer force of of it, it's not a durability feat. It's absorbtion

@Abhilegend, If you think lifting and striking are equal in comics, post the proof, if you don't misinterpret it like you usually do , I'll gladly concede on that part

Lol. He absorbed 2.5 million times the energy in a supernova, and it was ALL poison to him.

Thats a pure durability feat if I ever saw one.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol. He absorbed 2.5 million times the energy in a supernova, and it was ALL poison to him.

Thats a pure durability feat if I ever saw one.

Even if we assume that his 'sunlight' was more than the Maggeddon's 'anti-sunlight', since he was alive and he wasn't dead, it means his internal power > 2.5 million supernovas.

Hm.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol. He absorbed 2.5 million times the energy in a supernova, and it was ALL poison to him.

Thats a pure durability feat if I ever saw one.

yes as in the absorption regard

here it confirms it's clearly absorption feat

https://postimg.cc/image/7c9h864iz/e5f5b859/

It's not the same as this

https://postimg.cc/image/6zi322tzv/353abec7/

Which by the way, is a (perfect) example of what I said about absorbing energy before it explodes is much different than tanking a full blast

Superman absorbing the energy from Mageddon was published in 2000

Him getting KOed by the exploding sun was published in 2008

Clear difference between absorbing before explosion and actually getting hit by it